Your Response was posted! Click here to see it.
Posted on Aug 7, 2014
Should Cold War Veterans be allowed to join the American Legion and the VFW?
53.5K
416
258
25
25
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 84
Suspended Profile
SGT Hiller. We lost a lot of very fine highly committed people during the supposedly "cold" war. Most accepted their efforts would not be disclosed for many years - if they may ever be openly acknowledged. Some were lost while in uniform. Others were lost while undercover, out of uniform and/or seconded to a civilian agency. Some were lost at home while standing watch in their missile silos. Others were lost underwater, in the air, on land, or in between while stimulating the enemy to react, monitoring enemy response, shadowing enemy weapons platforms, or evading enemy weapons platforms, running a blockade, infiltrating or exfiltrating high value assets, foraging for crypto and/or nuclear materials on the deep sea floor, splicing into remote secure communication cables, on active assignment, or simply walking down the street while minding their own business between missions. Most were not seeking any recognition or awards for their work. Most were only acknowledged even after death by an anonymous star on a wall or a classified note in a file. In this sense, I would wonder about whether anyone may want to be a member of an organization that excluded officers and/or enlisted personal who put their lives on the line every day during the supposed "cold" war with no backup and no hazardous duty pay. Warmest Regards, Sandy
I walked into the local AL/VFW (they are combined in my small town) and was offered an application to be a waitress before I even opened my mouth.
(22)
(0)
LTC Joseph Gross
I'm an AL member. This is really because we wanted to stand up an American Legion Riders group in Brussels but not important. One of the things I found most interesting was that the Auxiliary is a women's group. This led me to ask if you had to be a man to serve in the AL! Of course you don't and they do have a male version of the Auxiliary but I really think it time to change that.
(3)
(0)
LTC Joseph Gross
Thanks for the update! We're standing up an auxiliary at the moment so we can sponsor a girl to Girls' State as well as give some credit to our wives and daughters who do so much here. Ride On!
(3)
(0)
SPC Travis Grizzard
The "men's auxiliary" of the American Legion is the Sons of the American Legion, for male descendants.
(0)
(0)
Maj Kim Patterson
As a footnote, I did clarify my reason for entering, became a member and attended several events. However, I would like to add I would happily serve my fellow veterans as a waitress. Serving those who serve is a privilege. By the time I asked for an application, the position had been filled so I stuck with my full time job as a nurse.
(7)
(0)
Your question is very political. The truth is that war is hell, be it hot or cold. The Cold War was not ended until President Reagan fought it like a "real" war and won it (Oh, I can't wait to see how people jump on that observation). Maybe, the VFW should acknowledge that fact and accept those who served in the Cold War the same as they accept those who fought in hot wars.
Politically, it seems similar to the conundrum of those who were killed and wounded during the Fort Hood shooting. Initially branded "workplace violence", these victims were denied Purple Hearts. Now they are receiving them because of a change in the political climate.
I wonder if, by the same reasoning, we will return to the War on Terror after the Administration passes into new hands, and the same question asked here of Cold War service will apply to those who serve during the War on Terror.
Politically, it seems similar to the conundrum of those who were killed and wounded during the Fort Hood shooting. Initially branded "workplace violence", these victims were denied Purple Hearts. Now they are receiving them because of a change in the political climate.
I wonder if, by the same reasoning, we will return to the War on Terror after the Administration passes into new hands, and the same question asked here of Cold War service will apply to those who serve during the War on Terror.
(12)
(0)
SFC Jim Ruether
How about the airmen who served in missile silos here in North Dakota? How about the soldiers who trained in the U.S.A. with Tactical Nuclear Rounds at Ft. Sill, OK in the event they would be called up.? I knew exactly where I was going into the Fulda Gap if the crap hit the fan. I knew my chances for survival were next to nothing but I was ready and trained to the best of my ability.
(0)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
I too served in the Fulda Gap. I was stationed in Wildflecken Germany with the 54th Combat Engineers from 76 to 79.
(0)
(0)
Any Veteran can join the American Legion. It's just the VFW you would have to have deployed in a Campaign Ribbon deployment.
2014/12/19 **Correction** Any veteran can Join AMVETS ---I was mistakng them with American Legion.
2014/12/19 **Correction** Any veteran can Join AMVETS ---I was mistakng them with American Legion.
(12)
(0)
SSG John Bacon
SGT Mark Sullivan we were discussing American Legion not VFW. But you are correct about VFW membership. I am eligible for both memberships.
(0)
(0)
SGT Jim Z.
MEMBERSHIP ELIGIBILTY in the American Legion is based on honorable service with the U. S. Armed Forces between:
(April 6, 1917 -November 11, 1918) World War I
(December 7, 1941 - December 31, 1946) World War II
(June 25, 1950 - January 31, 1955) Korean War
(February 28, 1961 - May 7, 1975) Vietnam War
(August 24, 1982 - July 31,1984) Lebanon/Grenada
(December 20, 1989 - January 31, 1990) Operation Just Cause
(August 2, 1990 - Today)* Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm
Because eligibility dates remain open, all members of the U.S. Armed Forces are eligible to join The American Legion at this time, until the date of the end of hostilities as determined by the government of the United States.
Must have served at least one day of active military duty during one of the dates below and honorably discharged or still serving honorably. :
(April 6, 1917 -November 11, 1918) World War I
(December 7, 1941 - December 31, 1946) World War II
(June 25, 1950 - January 31, 1955) Korean War
(February 28, 1961 - May 7, 1975) Vietnam War
(August 24, 1982 - July 31,1984) Lebanon/Grenada
(December 20, 1989 - January 31, 1990) Operation Just Cause
(August 2, 1990 - Today)* Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm
Because eligibility dates remain open, all members of the U.S. Armed Forces are eligible to join The American Legion at this time, until the date of the end of hostilities as determined by the government of the United States.
Must have served at least one day of active military duty during one of the dates below and honorably discharged or still serving honorably. :
(2)
(0)
A1C Michael David Severson
I fall into those cracks, but the reason why, according to what the American Legion shares in its literature, Congress mandated these time periods by law. Now, whether or not to address whatever law is at issue is another pursuit worth doing, in my opinion. And yet the Cold War was indeed a war, with plenty of American blood and others flowing as a result.
I am also a subscriber to a Biblical principle that I believe should could: Service is service, and should be respected. Yes, more honor for those in combat, but denying benefits and such to someone who still served? That should not be, or deemed less than significant. Military life changes all of us forever, we can never be different once we have served. Here is the Scripture reference for consideration:
1 Samuel 30:22-25 Common English Bible (CEB)
22 But then all the evil and despicable individuals who had accompanied David said, “We won’t share any of the plunder we rescued with them because they didn’t go with us. Each of them can take his wife and children and go—but that’s it.”
23 “Brothers!” David said. “Don’t act that way with the things the Lord has given us. He has protected us and handed over to us the raiding party that had attacked us.
24 How could anyone agree with you on this plan? The share of those who went into battle and the share of those who stayed with the supplies will be divided equally.”
25 So from that day forward, David made that a regulation and a law in Israel, which remains in place even now.
I will be interested to see the response this passage generates.... :-) O:)
I am also a subscriber to a Biblical principle that I believe should could: Service is service, and should be respected. Yes, more honor for those in combat, but denying benefits and such to someone who still served? That should not be, or deemed less than significant. Military life changes all of us forever, we can never be different once we have served. Here is the Scripture reference for consideration:
1 Samuel 30:22-25 Common English Bible (CEB)
22 But then all the evil and despicable individuals who had accompanied David said, “We won’t share any of the plunder we rescued with them because they didn’t go with us. Each of them can take his wife and children and go—but that’s it.”
23 “Brothers!” David said. “Don’t act that way with the things the Lord has given us. He has protected us and handed over to us the raiding party that had attacked us.
24 How could anyone agree with you on this plan? The share of those who went into battle and the share of those who stayed with the supplies will be divided equally.”
25 So from that day forward, David made that a regulation and a law in Israel, which remains in place even now.
I will be interested to see the response this passage generates.... :-) O:)
(2)
(0)
PO1 (Join to see)
Actually you had to serve during certain periods for the AL. But the dates have never been closed since Desert Storm started. So if you served in the last 24 years you are eligible
(0)
(0)
As a life member of both organizations, more active in the AL and recent member of the VFW, I see problems for both organizations with membership if they do not change they requirements. Both organizations have problems attracting current active duty and recent veteran's of Afghanistan and Iraq wars. This was a problem with Viet Nam era veteran's while WWII veteran's were the majority of both organizations and has continued, what is the saying about history repeating itself?
A comrade in arms has suggested that the major organizations, AL and VFW specifically should merge as there is a large number of dual members between them, I am sure even the AMVETS and Marine Corps League has the same issue.
Our veteran's deserve a strong voice no matter when they served, we would not have the freedoms we have without a strong military whether they served during actual combat eras or in the times in between and a lot of the cold war veteran's are left out. I would like to add them to our organizations so we can help provide them the recognition they deserve.
A comrade in arms has suggested that the major organizations, AL and VFW specifically should merge as there is a large number of dual members between them, I am sure even the AMVETS and Marine Corps League has the same issue.
Our veteran's deserve a strong voice no matter when they served, we would not have the freedoms we have without a strong military whether they served during actual combat eras or in the times in between and a lot of the cold war veteran's are left out. I would like to add them to our organizations so we can help provide them the recognition they deserve.
(9)
(0)
SSG Leonard Johnson
I have to admit, VFW does not know how to recruit. At my college PPCC here in Colorado springs, we have all kinds of veterans using at college. All kinds of business and organizations set up shop to recruit in the cafe area...why doesn't VFW do the same thing?
(1)
(0)
Member eligibility critiera for the American Legion and the VFW is something that both organizations are going to have to critically look at. A few data points:
- Organizations that do not grow will die. A good example Grand Army of the Republic (GAR). Very influential in the 1870s and 1880s but influence diminished as its members died off.
- Organizations that do not adapt will die. Many good examples of this but look at any top tier business that is no longer in business.
- The US population is about 322M as of 2014. The percentage of this population with military experience is generally less than 1%. Therefore there is a very small eligibility pool to begin with without making the pool even smaller and shallower.
- The "so what" of the above is that the American Legion and VFW should both expand their membership eligibility without losing their core identify or purpose. They both should also make an effort at both the strategic and tactical levels of recruiting younger members (read GWOT veterans) into their leadership in order to get new ideas and maintain relevancy. I do not currently sense that this is the case.
- I have been a member of both organizations since about 1998.
- Organizations that do not grow will die. A good example Grand Army of the Republic (GAR). Very influential in the 1870s and 1880s but influence diminished as its members died off.
- Organizations that do not adapt will die. Many good examples of this but look at any top tier business that is no longer in business.
- The US population is about 322M as of 2014. The percentage of this population with military experience is generally less than 1%. Therefore there is a very small eligibility pool to begin with without making the pool even smaller and shallower.
- The "so what" of the above is that the American Legion and VFW should both expand their membership eligibility without losing their core identify or purpose. They both should also make an effort at both the strategic and tactical levels of recruiting younger members (read GWOT veterans) into their leadership in order to get new ideas and maintain relevancy. I do not currently sense that this is the case.
- I have been a member of both organizations since about 1998.
(9)
(0)
SPC Marc M
thank you col. I agree im a member of amvets post #25 carl j woods post named after a local airman who died shot down in vetnam. we have all three vfw/amercan ligion and amvets under one roof up here in Bottineau north Dakota. many of us wear al three caps. we get along great. we also have the auxilerys and county vso in the building. we see it as we all are vetrans . their is no such thing as a one man army. team work is what it takes. you take on one of us here you take on all three as it where. we stick together . we have guys up to 94yrs old an we all think the same.if we stand together we cant be broken. but devided we surely will be broke and fall. thank you for your service col an all my respct to you.
(2)
(0)
SFC Jim Ruether
SPC Marc M - Great to hear that you all get along. The VFW and the Legion in my town can't stand each other. So much bickering between the clubs.
(1)
(0)
Yes we should. The cold war was not as "cold" as people think.
As Marines we do things that people don't and won't know
were done.
So I say again. The "Cold War" wasn't as "Cold" as people think.
So yes they should. I served Marine Corps from "79/85".
As Marines we do things that people don't and won't know
were done.
So I say again. The "Cold War" wasn't as "Cold" as people think.
So yes they should. I served Marine Corps from "79/85".
(7)
(0)
(0)
(0)
A1C Michael David Severson
The operative word at the end of phrase is "war"... just because we didn't openly battle, does not mean we didn't battle at all! That is ludicrous to believe anything else, other than the fact I am sure some money-hugging bureaucrats in D.C. do not want to open a floodgate of financial liability to handle the claims that would likely follow.
Recent history of this is illustrated in the Fort Hood terrorist attack by Nidal Hassan, and by officially calling it a "workplace incident" despite the radical assertion of him yelling "Allahu Ahkbar", and later "repenting" of serving an infidel army that was fighting his Islamic "brothers"...
Meanwhile, those who suffered, died, etc., from that attack, are denied combat-related benefits or further assistance because of the designation that attack was given. Never mind the fact that since 2001, we have been engaged in a global "WAR On Terror, and that such an asymmetrical manner of warfare has been the standard ever since the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
Had Obama been in office in 2001, would he have labeled that even a "Workplace Incident," since 3 of the 4 places of attack involved buildings where people worked, regardless of whether or not they were civilian or military?
Much more to say, but I believe I have covered the conventional mindset that is ensconced in D.C., which needs to be addressed firmly. That said, looking at the aging population of VFW and American Legion posts, etc., something needs to be done, rather than leaving those of us who served during a VERY asymmetrical and clandestine war spanning about 45 years since the end of WWII...
MD :-)
Recent history of this is illustrated in the Fort Hood terrorist attack by Nidal Hassan, and by officially calling it a "workplace incident" despite the radical assertion of him yelling "Allahu Ahkbar", and later "repenting" of serving an infidel army that was fighting his Islamic "brothers"...
Meanwhile, those who suffered, died, etc., from that attack, are denied combat-related benefits or further assistance because of the designation that attack was given. Never mind the fact that since 2001, we have been engaged in a global "WAR On Terror, and that such an asymmetrical manner of warfare has been the standard ever since the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
Had Obama been in office in 2001, would he have labeled that even a "Workplace Incident," since 3 of the 4 places of attack involved buildings where people worked, regardless of whether or not they were civilian or military?
Much more to say, but I believe I have covered the conventional mindset that is ensconced in D.C., which needs to be addressed firmly. That said, looking at the aging population of VFW and American Legion posts, etc., something needs to be done, rather than leaving those of us who served during a VERY asymmetrical and clandestine war spanning about 45 years since the end of WWII...
MD :-)
(0)
(0)
I say depending on duty locations! Korea is already there for the VFW, but not the Legion.
I did not serve border duty on the E. German and Czech borders. Their incidents were alot less common then we had on the DMZ before 1991. But still was hazardous duty and dangerous if stepped the wrong way........
Vehicles were always uploaded with ammo and ready to go over there, as Korea was and still is.
And if you never served duty there during the Cold War, don't be so quick to judge. You don't know!!!!
I did not serve border duty on the E. German and Czech borders. Their incidents were alot less common then we had on the DMZ before 1991. But still was hazardous duty and dangerous if stepped the wrong way........
Vehicles were always uploaded with ammo and ready to go over there, as Korea was and still is.
And if you never served duty there during the Cold War, don't be so quick to judge. You don't know!!!!
(7)
(0)
SGT Thomas Lucken
Ray, I spent 13 years in Korea between 83-00. In the 80s was with the Cav and up on the Z quite a bit. 91 we turned the American Sector over to the ROKs!
Ran 37 combat patrols alone! Not bunker/guard duty, ranges, and so forth! :-)
Ran 37 combat patrols alone! Not bunker/guard duty, ranges, and so forth! :-)
(0)
(0)
SGT Thomas Lucken
It did also through the 70s and 80s! Then you get the idiots who never served up on the DMZ and/or over there at all. He say nothing every happen in Korea!
Bridge of No Return and Freedom Bridge!
Bridge of No Return and Freedom Bridge!
(2)
(0)
SGT Mark Sullivan
I had two tours in Korea, Army Aviation, supported ROK Special Forces and flew to locations throughout the DMZ area. 89-91 and 94-95, depending upon the unit you were in, there were many things going on then, that most folks have no clue about, even during those tours. Yes, I know of the Cheese Dicks that state nothing happens in Korea, they were usually REMF's
(4)
(0)
SGT Steve Oakes
She is right, no war time service or some kind of combat like Grenada, and its a no-go. At least at the one by me. I know some VFW require deployment to a combat zone and some just require war time service. Maybe the American Legion is the same way?
(0)
(0)
LTC Paul Labrador
VFW requires service in a foreign combat zone (since there was no peace treaty in Korea, it's still technically a combat zone).
(3)
(0)
SGT Thomas Lucken
Hell Camp Greaves from what I heard is being turned into Tourist Resort of some type I guess! But they been doing tourist tours to JSA/Panmunjom for years!
All my times up on the Z were for patrols, GPs, and some training in the 80s. 90s I went to several Repatriation Ceremonies of Korean War Remains.
All my times up on the Z were for patrols, GPs, and some training in the 80s. 90s I went to several Repatriation Ceremonies of Korean War Remains.
(2)
(0)
My answer is yes, because there are those who have served in hot places such as along the German border and Alaska.How many times have you had to stand to due to an imminent threat.Those who enlisted during this time period signed a blank check payable up to and including their lives.Speaking of which there were those who did lose their lives during this time period doing things for the US which are unspoken of.
(6)
(0)
Read This Next
Cold War

It was a long 46 years and much of what went on during the cold war will
never be known by American citizens. Thank you for your service.
NATO Site #107 ( North Point )
Kriegsfeld, Federal Republic of Germany ( 1969-1971)