Should Officers be required to have a Specific Degree in order to be commissioned?
I agree with SGM Matthew Quick, we all still had to go through leadership education and training. I know some less than ideal officers will slip through the cracks, but the training is still there.
Leadership aside, even if I had a B.S. in something applicable to the logistics field, would that necessarily make me a good leader, SSG (Join to see)? I think that component depends on the individual and their personal leadership skills. You can very easily have an intelligent subject matter expert who is in no way equipped with the mentorship, leadership, and relational skills needed to serve as an officer.
That seriousness aside, leadership is one of the greatest opportunities and the best gift that any officer can be given. It isn't easy, and many times I find myself going into my line leader's office and going "WHAT THE HELL?! How do people GET these ideas?!" But I wouldn't trade it for ANYTHING in the world, and they are always going to be my "kids"....
v/r,
CPT Butler
This was also the only Soldier that I ever cussed out of my office...
v/r,
CPT Butler
2LT Patelis, Let me start this by saying Well Said sir. "please help offer us your experience as an NCO so we can take that education and put it to good use in influencing our peers and superiors to make change in our Army." This quote from your post Nails it right on.
There is a symbiotic relationship between young officers and NCOs. We have to work together and strive for the same goal "Excellence".
Now I have my own opinion on this prior enlisted subject. Officers that were prior enlisted NCO or not, know more about what its like to be a Soldier, and many of their decisions reflect that. Those that were Senior NCOs or even Staff NCOs, have a set way of doing things and nothing is going to change that in some cases, and that could be both good and bad.
Officers with no prior experience contribute "a new fresh perspective", and come up with approaches to situations that nobody else ever thought of. Sometimes it works, sometimes it fails, but that's why we do things like I don't know "training" , and "rock drills".
If I go into a house and clear it, and everything works perfectly, and then go in to that same house 5 years later and use the same approach I could fail. What has worked time and time again, wont necessarily work every single time.
With out new Ideas, and Fresh thinking and yes Risks from time to time, we would have a hard time adapting to the ever-changing beast we call the battlefield. I'm not saying that either type of background for an officer is better or worse, because to me My LT will not fail because I will not let them fail.
That some junior and senior NCOs expect the young newly- minted 2LT to come with all the skills and knowledge.
Company-level NCOs didn't start off with on-the-job know-how. They were mentored and were shown right-from-wrong by those senior and more experienced then them. So, how then can the newly-minted 2LT acquire the same knowledge if the NCOs don't help out, just like they'd been helped when they were just starting out as Privates.
When I returned to Active Duty everything seemed different.
Maybe we lost our way in the time of war when actually this is when we need the most Leadership.
https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/what-is-the-one-thing-every-young-officer-must-know
Political science, economics, and these type of majors help officers in today's type of warfare. I truly believe that the more diverse the experiences of someone, it can help in the decision making process.
I am not sure where or what some of these Logistical Officers are taught as they seem to do their own thing and refuse to listen to the NCO's. It makes for an unusual and sometimes hostile environment.
They try to be everywhere and involve themselves in all matters.
Maybe it is just the newer ARMY I am not sure.

Officers
