Posted on Jun 30, 2014
CMDCM Gene Treants
127K
793
496
49
49
0
In the US Navy we have Traditionally Berthed enlisted personnel by Department and Division on Ships. With the introduction of Women on ships the Enlisted Berthing Areas have now been segregated into males being berthed by Department and Division and females into their separate areas. Officers live in Staterooms of 1, 2, or more officers and so the problem is much easier to handle.

To me this has always been strange because it breaks up work groups and separates people artificially. Sex between Sailors on the same ship has never been allowed, so that should not be a problem (right!) Now we have the added mixture of people being openly gay yet still assigned to the same berthing considerations.

BEQs at Shore Establishments have different rules based on availability of housing more than on gender. Is it time for a change or not?
Avatar feed
Responses: 150
CW3 Armament Technician
3
3
0
Edited 11 y ago
The future will be very starship troopers esque. I remember being downrange and having on two seperate occasions a norwegian and romanian army soldier (female) walk right in the shower, strip, and get in. The whole segregates sexes thing is a VERY American concept. Personally I think it should stop (in general), but many disagree and that's fine too.
(3)
Comment
(0)
CW3 Armament Technician
CW3 (Join to see)
11 y
Side note, we cohabitated with women on about half of one of my deployments due to the nature of our location and the need for security, and I don't even recall a single issue that came of it. It's a maturity thing - you can either deal with it, or you can not. I grew up in a household with 6 women and one bathroom. We were very... close in the mornings, because that bathroom was a busy place.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SFC Indirect Fire Infantryman (Mortarman)
SFC (Join to see)
11 y
Preach. haha.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CMDCM Gene Treants
CMDCM Gene Treants
11 y
Our society may not be ready, but often the Military has to lead the way. It may be time for all of us, male and female alike to stop the point and giggle crap.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
I'm coming into this discussion a bit late, but I have to say I think that this would be a horrid idea. It would promote, imho, more sexual misconduct; whether it be rape, harassment, hazing or consensual, it's just asking for trouble.

I don't know what conditions are like in a FOB, never having been at one, but I have seen what things are like on Navy ships with women, and it's always messy.

Good order and discipline mandates, imho, maintaining appropriate boundaries, if for no other reason than to keep honest sailors honest.
CMDCM Gene Treants
CMDCM Gene Treants
11 y
LCDR Jaron Matlow as the number of women in the Navy and at sea increases we really need a paradigm shift and new types of thinking to make sure all of our bunks are filled and personnel levels are maintained. What is a good way to ensure that we do not deploy with unfilled bunks and missing people people. Any Suggestions Commander?
(0)
Reply
(0)
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
11 y
Master Chief, when I was Radcon officer on Shenandoah, one of the things we noted was about a 25% pregnancy rate among women in the several months before deployment. It was known that a number of them got pregnant deliberately to avoid deploying - a very cynical thing to do, but yet it was done.

I have long felt, and I know this is far from PC, that sea duty should include an obligation to avoid pregnancy. If any male sailor caused a medical condition to avoid deployment, they'd go to mast, yet no women were ever held accountable for this.

I understand that women's reproductive rights are a very touchy subject, but still, when you volunteer to join the Navy, as we all do these days, and you raise your right hand, you incur an obligation. I strongly feel that this includes avoiding pregnancy.

If you're talking about a non-rated seaman, no big deal. But.. what about on a Tender, when you have ONE sailor with a given NEC. If she leaves due to deployment, you are no longer mission ready.

I guess a parallel for men would be that they incur an obligation to not have pregnant wives during deployment -again, a hugely difficult proposition, but according to the Family Leave act, Paternity leave carries the same weight as Maternity leave.

I know none of this would ever happen, but that's one thing that needs to be done to make this work.

The other way to make it work would be the "Pink ship" - an all woman crew. That has its own unique problems as well.

So, Master Chief - what would you do? You are a wiser man than I as an MCPO - I never claimed to know more than my master chiefs...
CMDCM Gene Treants
CMDCM Gene Treants
11 y
LCDR Jaron Matlow I knew of this strange, prior to deployment disease of pregnancy that happened once some women were stationed on ships. Back in the late 70's when I was a Company Commander, if a woman became pregnant, she was discharged if she wanted to be and had been in less then 2 years, not kidding. So a lot of them got out that way and then aborted their child as soon as the discharge came through.

I don't know if Navy still keeps women from deploying if they are pregnant, but I would keep her aboard as long as possible and then return her to their unit as soon as Maternity Leave was over. Oh, what a bummer. I would also make sure this policy was well known. If I could do it, I agree, no pregnancy while attached to a ship, either gender.

We talked about Pink Ships a long time ago when I went to Senior Enlisted Academy (Class 09 in 1983) and it just made NO sense at all. There were just not enough trained personnel of each rate to make the idea fly and then to replace the people as they rotated out, plus that was only one or two ships that we could do. (Since we were at Newport we got input from NWC as well.)

At that time we were NOT thinking about one berthing space with mixed gender, we did not even admit (officially) there was such a thing as, dare I say it, homosexuality, in the Navy.

Wise? I don't not know if that applies, but I listen, consider, stay up on rules and regs, seek input from all hands, and then I make my best decision for a recommendation to my CO. In making that recommendation I do consider all inputs, but it is not a vote, it is my true belief of what the situation warrants, sometimes without other input if there is no time to gather, but based on my judgment alone.
(0)
Reply
(0)
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
11 y
ETCM, I was told by our ship's doc that most of the women who got pregnant did in fact abort then transfer to another ship - a real sick plot if you ask me.

Re pregnant women now at sea; the issue hasn't changed - pregnant women need to be close to a major medical facility, and generally the CVN isn't enough -so once they report the pregnancy, no Skipper will keep them on board - the medical risk is too great...

Thanks for the info about your deliberations on the Pink Ship - I know it wouldn't fly - and there are other reasons besides those you mention, as well.

Still, as one experienced with women at sea, and now as clergy, my vote remains no on co-ed berthing...
COL Charles Williams
3
3
0
I am no Navy Expert... aside from being the son of retired Navy Sub Mariner. I think, no matter where this gender integration effort takes us, that there are some things we should do (when possible) separately. Sleeping (berthing), and showers and latrines are in that category.
(3)
Comment
(0)
CMDCM Gene Treants
CMDCM Gene Treants
11 y
I have to agree - WHEN POSSIBLE, for the good of the mission and the Ship.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSgt Sharon Mallory-Robinson
MSgt Sharon Mallory-Robinson
11 y
Col Williams I will agree with you that if it is not necessary to berth personnel together, why do it? However, in the field you and I both know that placing a few females in a tent alone, separated from the rest of the team can be a disaster. In certain situations, where the safety of all is concerned, placing a few alone is unsafe. Other then that, I cannot see in the confined space of a ship, with everyone trying to move around the berthing areas, where it is necessary to have the genders mixed. Until humans begin to mature at an earlier age, mixing late teenagers in a small space is not always a good thing.
(0)
Reply
(0)
COL Charles Williams
COL Charles Williams
11 y
Wow that is a great point MSgT Mallory-Robinson.... Obviously my background is of Soldier...
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO2 Fire Controlman
2
2
0
I think it'd be a bad idea. I would not feel comfortable sleeping and dressing/undressing in front of males. My boyfriend wouldn't be very excited about the idea either.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO3 Machinist Mate
2
2
0
Edited 11 y ago
I would love to say that as adults we could handle this. But after being deployed for 9 months on a carrier, I can tell you it wouldn't be a horrible idea. Yes sex is not supposed to happen between sailors, but we all know it does. Sleeping in the same berthing would be pushing the boundaries of temptation. I know that some of the lesbians in our berthing on deployment were having sex, so tell me that it wouldn't happen in an integrated berthing. I would have no problem sharing a berthing with the guys I work with, but the rest of my department? Even my division? I don't know. I don't think I would be able to sleep comfortably around them. When you are deployed, and you are around the same people every day for 12 hours a day, you start to become emotionally attached to them, weather it's love, lust, or you start to think of them as family, I couldn't imagine how much worse it would be if we all shared a berthing. Not to mention, when it comes to showering and changing, I don't want the guys I work with to see me in minimal clothing by mistake. The Navy is all about stopping sexual abuse and sexual harassment, tell me that wouldn't happen in an integrated berthing.
(2)
Comment
(0)
CMDCM Gene Treants
CMDCM Gene Treants
11 y
PO3 (Join to see) you are being sexually harassed if you are having to listen to or experience lesbians (or hetrosexual couples) having sexual relations in your berthing area.
Having to look over your shoulder and see if you are safe is never comfortable. I know this is a radical idea and it may never come to fruition in any case, but you do need to be comfortable today.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO3 Lenrica Levy
2
2
0
NO. PERIOD. PRINCIPLE IS PRINCIPLE.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 Leading Petty Officer (Lpo)
2
2
0
Continuing this thought process, should heads be segregated then? If we are going to work, eat and sleep together (same berthing not same rack), should we also shower together?
(2)
Comment
(0)
CMDCM Gene Treants
CMDCM Gene Treants
11 y
I do not know of any ships that have open showers. The ones I have see all have closed shower spaces that are like little rooms, not like the scene in Star Ship Troopers.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PO1 Leading Petty Officer (Lpo)
PO1 (Join to see)
11 y
Yes some do have shower stalls, but not all stalls have curtains. there was a few times I had to make curtains for them. Until I had made them people were still showering in them. Star Ship Troopers is what came to mind when I read this article.
(0)
Reply
(0)
FN Rurik Schutte
FN Rurik Schutte
11 y
mean times the shower stalls are to small to shower in, and change?
(0)
Reply
(0)
PO1 Leading Petty Officer (Lpo)
PO1 (Join to see)
11 y
Most shower stalls were the standard size you'd find in a military hotel...barely big enough for a 6 foot tall, 180 lb. guy to shower in.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO3 Purchasing Manager
2
2
0
Edited 11 y ago
I haven't been able to read all the responses so if I repeat ideas already put forth, you have my apologies.

My first thought is "Why bother?" Will it really make the division or department work better? Have more Esprit de Corps?

My second thought is that the main problem people will face is lack of privacy. Sure there's no privacy already in ship's berthing but at least you (mostly) don't have to worry about your genitals being oggled while you change into fresh skivvies in a segregated berthing.

Thirdly, I doubt that it will facilitate any fraternization. Enlisted berthing is just too jam packed for that sort of thing to pass unnoticed. If people are going to do it they will just find a void somewhere and do it there.

Anyway unless the ship is unable to provide separate berthing due to lack of available spaces to put them then I think it's not really necessary.
(2)
Comment
(0)
CMDCM Gene Treants
CMDCM Gene Treants
11 y
Some very good thoughts PO3 (Join to see). Thanks for your response and yes, some have been mentioned, but it is always worth saying again.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO2 Ryan Sparks
2
2
0
Excuse me but Incase everyone hasnt noticed the racks on board the ship barely fit the average person so there is not near enough space for intercourse between 2 people. If your gonna have sex on board a ship everyone knows you go to a fan room. So as long as the changeing and showering happens separately there shouldn't be problems.
(2)
Comment
(0)
CMDCM Gene Treants
CMDCM Gene Treants
11 y
Even the "luxurious" CPO berthing is the same, Barley big enough for one.
(0)
Reply
(0)
FN Rurik Schutte
FN Rurik Schutte
11 y
" If there is a will there is a way"
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO2 Meagan Brown
2
2
0
All of this business about sex and rape and acting like adults aside - every shipboard berthing I ever ran across was connected to the head/showers. Am I cool with sleeping in the same room with a bunch of dudes? Sure. Am I cool showering in the same room as a bunch of dudes? NOT IN A MILLION YEARS
(2)
Comment
(0)
CMDCM Gene Treants
CMDCM Gene Treants
11 y
Even though each shower is enclosed in its own private bubble? Curtains or doors that make sure you are in a room without a view?
(0)
Reply
(0)
FN Rurik Schutte
FN Rurik Schutte
11 y
PO2 Meagan Brown
Did you go through boot camp? Great Lakes A-School?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close