Posted on Sep 8, 2021
What suggestions do you have for renaming DoD installations honoring Confederate officers?
162K
6.02K
1.88K
1K
1K
0
Doesn't matter if you agree with this move or not - it's been directed and it's happening. What are your suggestions for renaming the following bases?
- Fort Bragg
- Fort Rucker
- Fort Benning
- Fort Gordon
- Fort Hood
- Fort Polk
- Fort A.P. Hill
- Fort Belvoir
- Fort Lee
- Fort Pickett
- Fort Bragg
- Fort Rucker
- Fort Benning
- Fort Gordon
- Fort Hood
- Fort Polk
- Fort A.P. Hill
- Fort Belvoir
- Fort Lee
- Fort Pickett
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 855
I have a suggestion, leave well enough alone! You can't erase history no matter how hard you try.
(496)
(4)
SSG Robert Pratt
Total waste of tax dollars, all the signage, stationary, ect. well over a couple million dollars for some feel good reaction!
(4)
(0)
A1C Medrick "Rick" DeVaney
PO1 Kenneth Brock -
When We Hear Someone SAY Something Is Right Or Wrong,
Doe Not Mean It's Either. And Because It's A Subjective Statement,
It's Simply A Matter Of Opinion. ~~ EXCEPT For Mine, And That's Because
I'm ALWAYS Right. (;-)> And That's A FACT! ~ Almost.
When We Hear Someone SAY Something Is Right Or Wrong,
Doe Not Mean It's Either. And Because It's A Subjective Statement,
It's Simply A Matter Of Opinion. ~~ EXCEPT For Mine, And That's Because
I'm ALWAYS Right. (;-)> And That's A FACT! ~ Almost.
(1)
(0)
CPO Charles Baran
COL (Join to see) - Its repairing NOTHING!
It cannot be repaired, and we cannot judge warriors of yesteryear on some new criteria made more than a hundred years after their time.
I think Slavery was heinous- My family wasn't even here when it went on.
When I was birthed in 1960- My Grandma was STILL indentured and worked for Dem elites in Massachusetts.
We've known forever that we need to learn from the past---- why one would want to hide such a graphic proof of the past is beyond me.
When the morons decided to do this- it was my belief that things should stay right where they were... BUT the other side of the story should have been put in BOLD RED TYPE on a large sign beside it- preferrable with pictures, names etc to make it personal.
Let's teach the positives and negatives about these people- because there are positives though the negatives outweigh it by today's standards.
It cannot be repaired, and we cannot judge warriors of yesteryear on some new criteria made more than a hundred years after their time.
I think Slavery was heinous- My family wasn't even here when it went on.
When I was birthed in 1960- My Grandma was STILL indentured and worked for Dem elites in Massachusetts.
We've known forever that we need to learn from the past---- why one would want to hide such a graphic proof of the past is beyond me.
When the morons decided to do this- it was my belief that things should stay right where they were... BUT the other side of the story should have been put in BOLD RED TYPE on a large sign beside it- preferrable with pictures, names etc to make it personal.
Let's teach the positives and negatives about these people- because there are positives though the negatives outweigh it by today's standards.
(2)
(0)
CW3 Richard Doty
Unfortunately, the language that it is "changing history" is really a false narrative. Those posts were primarily named well after the Civil War. The statues of some of these Confederate generals are there because of the Daughters of the Confederacy, who pushed the Lost Cause narrative. Their naming was mostly based on political considerations. The men for whom these posts were named were traitors to the US. They led battles that killed US soldiers. I'm not suggesting that they be erased--we should always understand traitors and insurrectionists--but naming a military installation after them seems like it's pandering to a political group for political expediency. There's a difference between venerating and remembering. I would be for renaming all of the posts after Medal of Honor recipients.
(0)
(0)
It's humorous to me about how the big Army (and the left side) always tries to change the names of something we've always had & used....
Like the now politically correct term of "DFAC or dining facility".
And yet - we still, and probably will always call it the "Chow Hall"!!!
To me, Ft Bragg has a special place in my heart, soul & memory - and it will always be Bragg, no matter how many different politically-correct left side terms they decide to rename it!
Like the now politically correct term of "DFAC or dining facility".
And yet - we still, and probably will always call it the "Chow Hall"!!!
To me, Ft Bragg has a special place in my heart, soul & memory - and it will always be Bragg, no matter how many different politically-correct left side terms they decide to rename it!
(343)
(1)
SGT Warren Crutcher
That's why I didn't trust our previous President. He had a 50-year career of lies.
(3)
(0)
A1C Medrick "Rick" DeVaney
SGT Warren Crutcher -
Perhaps Biden DID Lie, I've Never know A Politician Whom Didn't,
But Trump Was Habitual At It, I Have My Doubts If He Was Even Capable
Of Being Truthful; It's Just The Way He Was, As Though It Was In His DNA.
Perhaps Biden DID Lie, I've Never know A Politician Whom Didn't,
But Trump Was Habitual At It, I Have My Doubts If He Was Even Capable
Of Being Truthful; It's Just The Way He Was, As Though It Was In His DNA.
(0)
(0)
PO1 Helena Janice Ritz
However, did you know it was named after a Confederate? Were you aware of Bragg's earned a reputation for incompetence, for wantonly shooting his own soldiers, and for losing battles? Why should this nation honor a losing side in a Civil War? We are ONE NATION. We have coddled the Confederates long enough. They lost. They should not be honored any longer.
(2)
(0)
PO1 Helena Janice Ritz
*I really wish some people would learn the difference between fascism and democratic socialism. But, since y'all don't care, I feel sorry for you.
(0)
(0)
PO1 Helena Janice Ritz
SPC Randy Torgerson - Fascism is a disease that infects the soul of a nation. Christian nationalist run around claiming they are being "discriminated against" because people tell them to stop forcing their beliefs down the throats of everyone else. White supremacists run wild, claiming "Jews will not replace us," because they realize they are a dying breed filled with hate and fear. Why does the United States get to decide who has nuclear weapons? Why should we protect the genocidal regime of Israel (the UN has even declared Netanyahu a war criminal). Why did the Trump regime cozy up to the likes of fascist regimes such as El Salvador, Russian, and North Korea? Because Trump and the GOP are fascists. Project 2025 is a fascist playbook unfolding in front our eyes on a daily basis. Did Biden make mistakes and lie? Sure. All presidents do. Was he worse than Trump? Hell no. Not by a long shot.
Fear keeps people from action. Fear also allows those who believe they are right to attempt to control those who don't agree with them. We did not have "open borders" no matter how many times it is said on Fox News or by this regime. Biden deported more people that Trump did his entire first term. Obama deported more than both of them combined still. Now, this regime wants to take citizenship away from naturalized Americans. Who's next? You? Me? Not on my watch.
We can agree to disagree, but the fact of the matter is unless people begin to realize and wake up to the fact that this regime is fascism running amok without the oversight and checks & balances we're supposed to have, we won't have a country we can call the United States any longer. They are dismantling it one step at a time. One amendment at a time. As a veteran, I swore an Oath to the Constitution, not a man or a president. I'll defend it by any means necessary.
Fear keeps people from action. Fear also allows those who believe they are right to attempt to control those who don't agree with them. We did not have "open borders" no matter how many times it is said on Fox News or by this regime. Biden deported more people that Trump did his entire first term. Obama deported more than both of them combined still. Now, this regime wants to take citizenship away from naturalized Americans. Who's next? You? Me? Not on my watch.
We can agree to disagree, but the fact of the matter is unless people begin to realize and wake up to the fact that this regime is fascism running amok without the oversight and checks & balances we're supposed to have, we won't have a country we can call the United States any longer. They are dismantling it one step at a time. One amendment at a time. As a veteran, I swore an Oath to the Constitution, not a man or a president. I'll defend it by any means necessary.
(0)
(0)
PFC (Join to see)
While I dont agree with trying to change history by changing the name of long standing bases, changing them to MOH names would be an acceptable change.
(1)
(0)
(1)
(0)
While I am one of those that would not change anything and have some choice words for those that want them changed, here are my suggestions.
- Fort Bragg: Fort Donlon, in honor of COL Roger HC Donlon, Special Forces, 1st MoH in Vietnam
- Fort Rucker: Fort Crandall, in honor of COL Bruce Crandall, Army Aviator, MoH Ia Drang, Vietnam
- Fort Benning: Fort Moore, in honor of LTG Hal Moore, Commander 1-7 Cav in the Ia Drang, from
"We were Soldier once and Young"
- Fort Gordon: Fort York, in honor of Alvin C York, MoH World War I, ,initial military training at Fort
Gordon, service as a Signal Corps Officer in World War II
- Fort Hood: Fort Murphy, in honor of MAJ Audie L Murphy, MoH World War Two, Native Born Texan
- Fort Polk: Fort Poolaw, in honor of 1SG Pascal Poolaw, 3 CIBs Most Highly Decorated Native
American, served in WWII, Korea and Vietnam
- Fort A.P. Hill: Fort Miyamura, in honor of SSG Hiroshi Miyamura, MoH Korea, POW Korea, served
with the 442 Infantry in WWII
- Fort Belvoir: Rename to it's original name, Fort Humphries in honor of Union Army General A.A.
Humphries, it was renamed in 1930 to honor a local Virginian
- Fort Lee: Fort Doss, in honor of Army Medic Desmond Doss, MoH Hacksaw Ridge, Okinawa saved up
to 100 wounded men by lowering them down a cliff, despite being wounded four times
himself.
- Fort Pickett: Fort Gregory, in honor of SGT Earle Davis Gregory, VAARNG, MoH World War I.
These men are all Heroes and are deserving of recognition.
- Fort Bragg: Fort Donlon, in honor of COL Roger HC Donlon, Special Forces, 1st MoH in Vietnam
- Fort Rucker: Fort Crandall, in honor of COL Bruce Crandall, Army Aviator, MoH Ia Drang, Vietnam
- Fort Benning: Fort Moore, in honor of LTG Hal Moore, Commander 1-7 Cav in the Ia Drang, from
"We were Soldier once and Young"
- Fort Gordon: Fort York, in honor of Alvin C York, MoH World War I, ,initial military training at Fort
Gordon, service as a Signal Corps Officer in World War II
- Fort Hood: Fort Murphy, in honor of MAJ Audie L Murphy, MoH World War Two, Native Born Texan
- Fort Polk: Fort Poolaw, in honor of 1SG Pascal Poolaw, 3 CIBs Most Highly Decorated Native
American, served in WWII, Korea and Vietnam
- Fort A.P. Hill: Fort Miyamura, in honor of SSG Hiroshi Miyamura, MoH Korea, POW Korea, served
with the 442 Infantry in WWII
- Fort Belvoir: Rename to it's original name, Fort Humphries in honor of Union Army General A.A.
Humphries, it was renamed in 1930 to honor a local Virginian
- Fort Lee: Fort Doss, in honor of Army Medic Desmond Doss, MoH Hacksaw Ridge, Okinawa saved up
to 100 wounded men by lowering them down a cliff, despite being wounded four times
himself.
- Fort Pickett: Fort Gregory, in honor of SGT Earle Davis Gregory, VAARNG, MoH World War I.
These men are all Heroes and are deserving of recognition.
(83)
(0)
(1)
(0)
(1)
(0)
CW2 Donald Loughrey
Good recommendations. I'd offer Ft Davis for Col (Ret) Parris Davis, recent MOH winner and former Commander of 10th SFG(A) when I was there.
(0)
(0)
Charles Shaw
Good Ideas, thr trouble is (and a good trouble to have) is there are many jeroic and good men and women to honor with a fort or installation. For Ft. Benning, why not Rodgeway or Gavin ? MacArthur or Roosevelt. It may be sacrilege, but why not the place name. Interesting g they tried to rename Ft. Lee, NJ. Then it was pointed out it was named long before R.E. Lee was famous. The answer? "It doesn't matter the optics are bad". Luckily saner people prevailed.
(0)
(0)
Despite the just and appropriate abhorrence we feel at the Confederate cause, these men (mostly GOs and Colonels under the CSA) were in almost every case honorable MEN, upright Soldiers, and in some cases, even vigorously anti-slavery in their own lives & practices, as has been well-documented of Robert E. Lee. Leave them as they are.
Even if there's no good reason to honor the man-- one major base on that list is said to have been named for a deep-pocketed local donor of the Jim Crow era and party, rather than a war hero from either side-- relabeling the bases will cost money the Army doesn't need to spend, on a mission with no connection at all to our principle purpose: to fight and WIN the nation's wars.
Or have we forgotten that that's what an Army exists for?
Even if there's no good reason to honor the man-- one major base on that list is said to have been named for a deep-pocketed local donor of the Jim Crow era and party, rather than a war hero from either side-- relabeling the bases will cost money the Army doesn't need to spend, on a mission with no connection at all to our principle purpose: to fight and WIN the nation's wars.
Or have we forgotten that that's what an Army exists for?
(75)
(0)
SGT Walter Drumm
John Gordon was a staunch supporter of the rights of former slaves in the Reconstruction South, as well as a tireless advocate for wounded veterans on both sides.
(0)
(0)
PO3 Donald Murphy
1SG Bernhard Mattulat - Sadly thats what it was. Appease the locals so as to rebuild the country as quickly as possible. North did not get the big victory it talks of. South was more than happy/able/willing to engage in guerilla warfare. War needed to end NOW by whatever means. If that involved a statue here or there, then so be it.
Then - remember that Lincoln is the first Republican. He was the third party candidate. Now he's dead and there's a lot of politicians wanting to go back to the way it was before the election. Trust me - they are worried about more important things than a statue. Executions for treason would likewise, be an idea that got quashed. What was done was not the best but sadly, it was done with the best tools available at the time. Always difficult to look at 1860's events with 2023 eyes.
Then - remember that Lincoln is the first Republican. He was the third party candidate. Now he's dead and there's a lot of politicians wanting to go back to the way it was before the election. Trust me - they are worried about more important things than a statue. Executions for treason would likewise, be an idea that got quashed. What was done was not the best but sadly, it was done with the best tools available at the time. Always difficult to look at 1860's events with 2023 eyes.
(1)
(0)
SSG Roger Ayscue
1SG Bernhard Mattulat - Not at all First Sergeant. I am in agreement that MoH winners should be honored and if the intent was to do so, For example to rename Fort Benning to Fort Moore to honor General Moore because of General Moore's accomplishments, then by all means do so.
The problem is that the entire movement to rename the forts was begun by liberal politicians in search of a means to pander to people who, like the politicians in question, had not a clue who the individuals the bases were named after were, nor what they did or did not do. The problem I have is with the motives and motivation of those who shoved the changes down the throats of the DoD.
To rename a Fort to honor a true hero is commendable, but to rename a fort, incurring the unnecessary costs and burden on both the military and the civilian communities they occupy, so that politicians like Senator Elizabeth Warren can bank the political capital is asinine and foolish, as well as a misuse of taxpayer's funds.
Personally, I feel that to rename Fort Bragg is to dishonor the tens of thousands of us that served there. I served a decade and a half at FORT BRAGG. I have never been to Fort Liberty. "Fort Liberty" is not in the soldier's Lexicon. Say I was at Bragg, and everyone knows exactly where. "Bragg" is synonymous with the best of the Army and is in common use, even to those that have no idea just how truly loathsome and what a terrible officer Braxton Bragg was. No one ever heard of Braxton Bragg until this all came up and they looked him up. Had this not come up, Braxton Bragg would have remained in historical obscurity where he belonged, and "Bragg" would still be my home.
The problem is that the entire movement to rename the forts was begun by liberal politicians in search of a means to pander to people who, like the politicians in question, had not a clue who the individuals the bases were named after were, nor what they did or did not do. The problem I have is with the motives and motivation of those who shoved the changes down the throats of the DoD.
To rename a Fort to honor a true hero is commendable, but to rename a fort, incurring the unnecessary costs and burden on both the military and the civilian communities they occupy, so that politicians like Senator Elizabeth Warren can bank the political capital is asinine and foolish, as well as a misuse of taxpayer's funds.
Personally, I feel that to rename Fort Bragg is to dishonor the tens of thousands of us that served there. I served a decade and a half at FORT BRAGG. I have never been to Fort Liberty. "Fort Liberty" is not in the soldier's Lexicon. Say I was at Bragg, and everyone knows exactly where. "Bragg" is synonymous with the best of the Army and is in common use, even to those that have no idea just how truly loathsome and what a terrible officer Braxton Bragg was. No one ever heard of Braxton Bragg until this all came up and they looked him up. Had this not come up, Braxton Bragg would have remained in historical obscurity where he belonged, and "Bragg" would still be my home.
(1)
(0)
Capt Jeff S.
People seem to forget why the South seceded and slavery was only a small part of the reason. The voting population in the South was much smaller consequently they had less representation in Congress. The Mills in the North wanted to cash in on the South's agrarian success and they lobbied Congress to enact laws that essentially forced the Southern States to sell their cotton to them at cut-rate prices at a time when demand for cotton was high in Europe and the Europeans were willing to pay a higher price for it. The Southern States wanted to export their cotton to Europe but were prevented from doing so by Congress. They bitterly complained but their voices fell on deaf ears. The Northern States used their population advantage to steamroll their agenda through Congress despite the objections of the Southern States. Tired of having their voice ignored, the Southern States got together and seceded from the Union (which was their Constitutional Right) to form a Confederate government that would listen to them and represent their interests.
Lincoln campaigned on the anti-Slavery platform because he knew it would get him votes. Trends in America followed trends in Europe and slavery had been abandoned in Europe < not because the Europeans had a twinge of conscience and change of heart; rather, it was the advent of the Industrial Revolution that convinced them to abandon the practice. They discovered it was more economically feasible to fuel and oil machines than it was to house, clothe, and feed slaves. It was already on the way out in America before the Civil War even started. It was declining in the North due to the North's industrial base, but the South, which was heavily agrarian-based, still relied on slaves to work the fields. At the outset of the Civil War, four of the Union States were slave states. During the War, Lincoln issued his Emancipation Proclamation. Note that Lincoln only freed the slaves in the South. He kept the slaves in the North enslaved because he needed every advantage to win the war. Lincoln was not the most popular President at the time because he was shredding the Constitution and consolidating power in the Federal government which went against the Founding Fathers' vision. They distrusted a strong federalized government and intentionally concentrated the fulcrum of power at the State level.
In not allowing the Southern States to secede, Lincoln embroiled the nation in a Civil War.
Lincoln was not a fan of the slaves and had planned to deport the slaves to the Caribbean, South America, and back to Africa after he concluded the Civil War. He felt it would be problematic trying to integrate former slaves into the society that enslaved them. Lincoln was stopped from deporting all blacks by an assassin's bullet. History remembers Lincoln a bit more kindly than it should (due to his assassination), and his Federalist legacy lives on. Incidentally, the last State to formally give up slavery was Delaware, in 1901.
We are experiencing today the problems associated when you have a Federal government dictating policy to the States and assuming responsibilities that the Constitution did not give it. Our Founding purposely limited the scope of the Federal Gov't and any powers not specifically enumerated by the Constitution as belonging to the Federal Government reside with the States. Education, Marriage, Healthcare... < These are all State issues according to the Constitution. Trump wants to make Abortion a State issue and he is correct. It IS a State issue!
Lincoln campaigned on the anti-Slavery platform because he knew it would get him votes. Trends in America followed trends in Europe and slavery had been abandoned in Europe < not because the Europeans had a twinge of conscience and change of heart; rather, it was the advent of the Industrial Revolution that convinced them to abandon the practice. They discovered it was more economically feasible to fuel and oil machines than it was to house, clothe, and feed slaves. It was already on the way out in America before the Civil War even started. It was declining in the North due to the North's industrial base, but the South, which was heavily agrarian-based, still relied on slaves to work the fields. At the outset of the Civil War, four of the Union States were slave states. During the War, Lincoln issued his Emancipation Proclamation. Note that Lincoln only freed the slaves in the South. He kept the slaves in the North enslaved because he needed every advantage to win the war. Lincoln was not the most popular President at the time because he was shredding the Constitution and consolidating power in the Federal government which went against the Founding Fathers' vision. They distrusted a strong federalized government and intentionally concentrated the fulcrum of power at the State level.
In not allowing the Southern States to secede, Lincoln embroiled the nation in a Civil War.
Lincoln was not a fan of the slaves and had planned to deport the slaves to the Caribbean, South America, and back to Africa after he concluded the Civil War. He felt it would be problematic trying to integrate former slaves into the society that enslaved them. Lincoln was stopped from deporting all blacks by an assassin's bullet. History remembers Lincoln a bit more kindly than it should (due to his assassination), and his Federalist legacy lives on. Incidentally, the last State to formally give up slavery was Delaware, in 1901.
We are experiencing today the problems associated when you have a Federal government dictating policy to the States and assuming responsibilities that the Constitution did not give it. Our Founding purposely limited the scope of the Federal Gov't and any powers not specifically enumerated by the Constitution as belonging to the Federal Government reside with the States. Education, Marriage, Healthcare... < These are all State issues according to the Constitution. Trump wants to make Abortion a State issue and he is correct. It IS a State issue!
(0)
(0)
Leave them be. Learn from our past rather than rewrite it. Grow a spine "Leaders". Stop caving to the will of these children.
(68)
(0)
SGT Ronald Audas
SSG (Join to see) - I don't know much,but I do know you are a puke and maintains no significance to anything or anyone.
(4)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
SGT Ronald Audas - No Boomer thats you!! You have no more to offer this world other than your incoherent ramblings and your uneducated ignorant opinions.
(1)
(2)
TSgt (Join to see)
SGT Ronald Audas - But Sgt Audas, If you served with this Anonymous coward maybe just maybe you could like him/her/it out?
(0)
(0)
do not rename any of them . why is the military going woke. i'm retired military and the military has gone crazy since i retired.
(50)
(1)
TSgt (Join to see)
The alphabet cult is taking control.
Gay speaker of the house
Queer secretary of health Adm Levine?
Buttatag Secretary of Transportation........
Then there is Milly and who knows
Gay speaker of the house
Queer secretary of health Adm Levine?
Buttatag Secretary of Transportation........
Then there is Milly and who knows
(0)
(0)
Capt Jeff S.
The problems we're seeing with the military is because Congress believes it should be a social experiment. They prioritized social experimentation over combat readiness and mission success. Serving in the military is not a right; it is a privilege. Our job as citizens is to provide ourselves with a Congress that will honor the oaths of office they swore to uphold and promptly forgot about. We have a Congress that tolerates folks who sleep with spies and sell this country out to hostile foreign special interests, launder taxpayer money that they gave away in foreign aid back to themselves, didn't claim income on their taxes, refuse to testify, lie under oath, destroy subpoenaed evidence, misrepresented their background and qualifications for office to the electorate, weaponized the government against our own citizens and violated their constitutional rights, etc. and believe that they do not have to answer for their criminal conduct to the people?!! They've been getting away with it for years and have established a very bad precedent -- because nobody cared. Many in Congress do not live up to UCMJ standards yet they are in charge of our military. What gives?
Our job as citizens is to be the term limits for the crooks in Congress and to hold them accountable for what they did and didn't do as our representatives. General Milley was selected not because he was the most qualified but because he would do anything he was told without question. The withdrawal of our troops in Afghanistan has Obama's fingerprints all over it and Gen Milley said, "Aye aye, three bags full, whatever you say Congress!" He was woke and had no spine. He should have put his food down and reminded Congress what would happen if he carried out those orders. It may have led to his dismissal but History would remember him as they will Gen Flynn as a man who took heat for doing the right thing.
Our job as citizens is to be the term limits for the crooks in Congress and to hold them accountable for what they did and didn't do as our representatives. General Milley was selected not because he was the most qualified but because he would do anything he was told without question. The withdrawal of our troops in Afghanistan has Obama's fingerprints all over it and Gen Milley said, "Aye aye, three bags full, whatever you say Congress!" He was woke and had no spine. He should have put his food down and reminded Congress what would happen if he carried out those orders. It may have led to his dismissal but History would remember him as they will Gen Flynn as a man who took heat for doing the right thing.
(0)
(0)
I served on half those installations, not once did I care on who they were. My focus was to do my job, support the mission, support the officers and nco's above me, and take care of the soldiers below me.
Changing the name serves what purpose? Because someone/activist is "offended" on who they were? This adminicircus is a joke!
I'm glad I retired! Since they are going to be renamed, name them after CMH recipients like Audie Murphy or MSG Benavidez.
Changing the name serves what purpose? Because someone/activist is "offended" on who they were? This adminicircus is a joke!
I'm glad I retired! Since they are going to be renamed, name them after CMH recipients like Audie Murphy or MSG Benavidez.
(47)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
SSG (Join to see) - They were TRAITORS TO THIS COUNTRY!! What do you not get about thaT? Is your brain so small or too decrepit that you can't understand the meaning of that word TRAITOR!! You are too small-minded and too ignorant to realize why they are changing the names of these FORTS. If people like you were in charge of this country we would still be back in the 1900s because you are too clueless to know the meaning of the word progress FOOL.
(1)
(3)
LCDR Jonathan Roudabush
Any new bases should be named after CMH recipients, If there are name changes -the same. I would not mind if all installations (and Ships) were named after US Heros. They disserve the honor. As do all who displayed valor in combat. Some of you are on this page as well. I am honored to be in their presence. I have had the honor of shaking the hands a of a few CMH recipients. Also of calling some heroes friends (Silver Star, Bronze Star etc).
(0)
(0)
if they're going to erase names from history due to the perceived negative connection then the safest bet is to name them after Latin-based flora and fauna, like Fort T-Rex, or Fort Taraxacum, etc... or is that too aggressive for a military base? anyone?
I mean, if we choose someone's actual *name* then we're bound to end up full circle deleting that name from history in some future politically correct battle because maybe they didn't pick their nose correctly, or perhaps they said something that got tweeted when they were 5 that becomes insanely offensive. Yay cancel culture /sarc/ /satire/ /hyperbole/
I mean, if we choose someone's actual *name* then we're bound to end up full circle deleting that name from history in some future politically correct battle because maybe they didn't pick their nose correctly, or perhaps they said something that got tweeted when they were 5 that becomes insanely offensive. Yay cancel culture /sarc/ /satire/ /hyperbole/
(38)
(0)
Suspended Profile
That is the most idiotic comment. History is not being erase fool. It is HISTORY!!
CPL James S.
SSG Esequuias Mendoza - wow. at least in my day even the food service specialists had to know how to read! if you're wondering what "/sarc/ /satire/ /hyperbole/" means, you can find the definitions here:
Sarcasm - https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/sarcasm
satire - https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/satire
Sarcasm - https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/sarcasm
satire - https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/satire
sarcasm noun - Definition, pictures, pronunciation and usage notes | Oxford Advanced Learner's...
Definition of sarcasm noun in Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary. Meaning, pronunciation, picture, example sentences, grammar, usage notes, synonyms and more.
(3)
(0)
Read This Next

Civil War
