Posted on Mar 31, 2016
Lt Col Jim Coe
283K
2.23K
1K
29
29
0
126e883b
Navy's top enlisted leader is wrapping up job title review. Intent is to remove "man" from job titles, such as corpsman, to make them gender neutral. All Air Force members are referred to as "airmen" and three enlisted ranks include "man" in their title. What would you suggest as an alternative to "airman"? (You can have fun with this, but serious alternatives also are appreciated.)
Edited 10 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 557
SPC Don Holcombe
2
2
0
The title should remain airman. There is no room for politcle correctness in the military. It gets good people killed.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt Apprentice Security Policeman
2
2
0
I would not change a thing I am so sick of this political correctness crap that now we gave to change the military because of peoples feelings. This is the US military protecting our rights not protecting political correctness. Plus political correctness is a type of censorship and censorship is violating our free speech rights.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CW3 Uc 35 &Amp; C 37 Instructor Pilot
2
2
0
Political correctness is destroying our nation piece by piece. Senior leaders should be focused on winning wars and protecting our nation rather than coddling the few thin-skinned individuals that actually care about this nonsense.
(2)
Comment
(0)
CPT Quentin von Éfáns-Taráfdar
CPT Quentin von Éfáns-Taráfdar
10 y
If someone in the services is so thin skinned that he/she is going to be offended by such words then he/she has chosen the wrong profession!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW4 UH-60M Pilot
2
2
0
As others have pointed out, many are fine with Airman, but if that is not a choice, I think aviator is next best. Yes it has issues since some say aviatrix is the female counterpart and therefore still sex based, but why then is there no sex based counterpart to sailor, we don't call her a sailrix. Aviatrix sounds contorted to me anyway. As is also pointed out, these names assign a description that doesn't really fit everyone in a service, not everyone in the Navy sails, not every in the Air Force flies. Making no differntiation of service, calling them all servicemembers is the easiest thing to do. If they all wore the same combat uniform, something I support, there would be no hurt feelings by calling a soldier a sailor when he or she has his or her back turned to one, instead calling out "Hey, servicemember." A bit long winded, in short there will never be an answer that pleases all. Maybe something more catchy like 'defender' or 'brave' the later coming from our national anthem, not a reference to the Native American term.
(2)
Comment
(0)
PO2 Brendon Carr
PO2 Brendon Carr
10 y
Good grief.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Operations Intelligence
2
2
0
We are in a state of over politically correctness. People wasting valuable time and resources.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Special Forces Officer
2
2
0
Should we not ask if this RENAMING nonsense increased the transgender confusion that seems to be increasing? Lord knows, I am confused about others! Is a transgender 'man', a former woman? or a former man? Who knows? Are they, we, it in agreement. Are these fine people [soldiers] handsome or pretty? You are confusing old school here and do you hear? And to WHOM, "does it really matter? I hate being confused, but love starting 'guerilla war's. May the best "woman" win. Pretty Woman with an EIB, it is expanding my mind. RESPECT the PERSON. Jellybellies come in many flavors (my son & granddaughters favorite candy).
(2)
Comment
(0)
MSgt Stephanie McCalister
MSgt Stephanie McCalister
10 y
MAJ (Join to see) so maybe a generic 'whom' for all branches currently using 'man' in any rank or MOS/AFSC descriptor? i.e. Airwhom? (yes, I am being sarcastic, I think the whole thing is silly to the extreme too!)

Color me a proud Airman!
(1)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Special Forces Officer
MAJ (Join to see)
10 y
Anyone objects can paint rocks! My wife (43 years) found me a yard flag VETERAN & PROUD. It is not bragging, when it is the TRUTH. I may have recruited 5 Active Duty members into my American Legion Post. Two USAF mantainers and the new Navy recruiter. Bingo Thursday night will tell.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SMSgt Lawrence McCarter
1
1
0
The PC people need to butt out, Woman or Man, Airman applies to them all and I've yet to find a female member "Airman" that has a problem with that title. When Men and women work side by side doing the same job don't come from the outside and think You know what they want or whats best for them or what is "Politically Correct" Once again the people that work the jobs, Men and women are the last ones asked. They are all Airmen on the same team, both Men and women, We don't need the divisions being forced on the civilian world by people that just don't know any better. Special treatment and whining about terminology that people Who are already there and have no problem with it is getting pretty sickening !
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Morrison  (Mike) Hogwood
1
1
0
I do not think that it is possible to change some descriptions into a neutral, but as we have been been taught some words are used in a masculine form when no feminine or neutral word, you use the masculine form,I feel that some jobs descriptions will no be able to change,the military has gotten way to PC,if you feel you can not do your job based a name, it may be time to leave the military,I thought the military mission was accomplish the mission.What a waste of money for something so petty.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Edward Tilton
1
1
0
Airhead would be more gender neutral
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
TSgt Thomas Monaghan
1
1
0
It has been acceptable so why change. The last 3 letters in Woman are Man so what'ts the issue?
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close