Posted on May 9, 2016
MSG Military Police
24.8K
424
271
11
11
0
Posted in these groups: Policy PolicyDod color DoDImprovements logo Improvements
Avatar feed
Responses: 78
LTC Trent Klug
30
30
0
1) Eliminate the reflective belts/vest requirement completely. It used to be just road guards wore them during hours of limited visibilty
2) Reduce the number of General officers and their perks. Guard Bureau had done just fine with a three star heading it, but then NGB gets a seat on the JCS, and instant four star...and nothing changed!
3) Stop the social engineering. The military is here to destroy our enemies, not to appease every hair-brained senator or congressman's politically motivated whim. (I looking directly at
(30)
Comment
(0)
CPL Wilfred Roberge
CPL Wilfred Roberge
>1 y
The Military can be a place for great Social CHANGE (history has proven that) we have never pushed "Agendas" forward during a war like now. I don't like it. I hate going to drill because 75% of the training we get has zero to do with military and 100% to do with "I'm okay your okay, she's okay, he's okay, he's gay, she's gay, I'm sad but don't be sad be glad. It is rediculous!!!!
(0)
Reply
(0)
A1C Jeff D.
A1C Jeff D.
>1 y
Maj John Bell - The "Time out" card was true? I thought it was BS. I never had one when in BASIC at Lackland in 1994.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Maj John Bell
Maj John Bell
>1 y
A1C Jeff D. - I think it is urban myth.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PO3 Nichalas Enser
PO3 Nichalas Enser
>1 y
A1C Jeff D. - They never existed, not in the 'common wisdom' way, anyhow.
For a short time during the '90s, the Navy gave recruits business cards with contact numbers of mental health and chaplain services to help reduce the number of after-hours attempted/successful suicides - something like 'Blues Cards'.

Although they could not be held up to stop difficult training or anything, some folks *mistakenly* believed that they could be used to interrupt training and an entire mythology was born!

Everyone likes to think that their generation was special or that their service is 'tougher' and this is just a part of that. Various stories claim that either the Army, Navy, Coast Guard, or Airforce has/uses them, but have never met anyone who has had one. There have been articles in the various ' Times' where they try to track down if it is true and none have found them to be in existence.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Cyber Transport Systems
25
25
0
1) Stop DOD wide always being PC.
2) Figure out a better way to give units money. I can't even count all the times units have nothing all year then right before the fiscal year ends they buy a bunch of stuff they don't really need. I don't know the solution but their has to be a better way.
3) Demote people who deserve it, not just ones who fail pt. I mean the people that get kicked around units or are in leadership roles in any way that just can do it. Quit paying that person for a job they can't/won't do.
(25)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Rene De La Rosa
MAJ Rene De La Rosa
>1 y
Clear and valid points.
(4)
Reply
(0)
MSG Military Police
MSG (Join to see)
>1 y
I can't provide enough Thumbs Up regarding your first point.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Capt Mba Student
23
23
0
1. Throw the entire lengthy acquisitions process out the window and start from scratch. Use consultative services from private industry to help draft our contracts until we have sufficient controls in place to prevent our current predicament with contract laws. Right now we're paying almost $180k for Cumins V12 Diesel for the AAV when the free market is paying somewhere around $5k for the same engine. Almost every MOS in every service has waste of this sort and the short-term high cost of consultants and private industry lawyers will be nothing compared to what we save on new contracts.
2. Institute new policies concerning unit fund allocations. Right now everyone spends so that they get the same amount next year. Ranges will never be "ammo dumps". We should be able to request training and have those funds allocated without the worry that the funds will go away next year.
3. Get rid of the civilian employees and contractors which are eating up the DoD budget when we could have servicemembers do the job cheaper. We've all heard of military higher-ups, officers and enlisted, creating justifications for new positions and then filling that post themselves when they retire at a comfy GS-12 or higher paygrade. I could name several positions off the top of my head. We don't need more garbage careerists sitting around waiting to turn 65 on the DoD's dime without providing actual value to the institution. Also, MFLACs need to go. No accountability and functions identical to the chaplain? Send the chaplains to a course if you want them to have more training, but we don't need more civilians accountable to no one. I'm tired of these garbage, entitled govt union employees who are incompetent, unhelpful, and wasteful by their very nature. I'd decimate MCCS as well, since a large portion of what they "give back" to the Marine community just goes to pay the salaries of their higher-level employees and places like MCRD aren't large enough to offset the cost of most of their services, especially when Miramar has identical services.
(23)
Comment
(0)
MSgt Health Services Management
MSgt (Join to see)
>1 y
So the civilian comment really? Remember that when you retire
(0)
Reply
(0)
A1C Charles Lawrence
A1C Charles Lawrence
>1 y
SPC Alex P. - I just joined this for the purpose of saying how utterly stupid and uninformed your comments are especially your totally uninformed remarkes about the Civil War. It was not liberals who practiced Jim Crow or lost the Civil War. Liberals wanted change they opposed slavery and Conservatives were conservative..they did not want change.

Let me give you a lesson in history. At the time of the Civil war it was the Democratic party that was the pro slavery and conservative party... Lincoln and the Black Republican were called the radical liberals because they were demanding change specificallly the restriction of slavery to where it already existed and its prohibition in the New Territories. After the war the Democrats,. conservatives of the day .. instituted Jim Crow.
For nearly one hundred years after the war the South voted Democratic and was known as the Solid South because of that..but in 1964 a Democrat, Lyndon Johnson, got the Civil Rights act passed which outlawed segregation. At that point the Dixicrats,, Southern Democrats pro segregation and against the Civil Rights law,,. left the Democratic party and joined the Republicans where they have remained ever since.
Ignorant uninformed people think that the Democratic party of 1860 is the same as the Democratic part of 1960 and same for the Repubican party.. Originally formed against slavery but now embracing the conservative point of view.

Next time you criticize someone like you just did..dont accuse them of not doing research when you clearly are totally wrong.. There is not a single student of the Civil War who would ever suggest that the Democratic party of pro slavery and Jim Crow was "liberal"
Do some research youself before you criticize others when you clearly dont know what you are talking about!


and your reference to President Obama as Barry tell me all I need to know about you..
(0)
Reply
(0)
Capt Mba Student
Capt (Join to see)
>1 y
A1C Charles Lawrence - Political Science degree holder here. I understand the anger in terms of feeling insulted by the previous user talking about "libs". It wasn't necessary. However, this post is also factually incorrect. When we're examining the modern political spectrum, and looking to past historical events, you can't cherry-pick ideas to fit your modern ideology. If we're talking about the classical left-right spectrum, anyone who doesn't support a monarchy is "classically liberal". There's also editorialized issues with the GOP-Democrat debate that are ignored, like the Democrats in the Civil War being more focused on states rights and the GOP of 1964 voted in higher percentage terms for the Civil Rights Act of 1965 by a wider margin than the Democrats. Many eras have totally different ideas that offer a mix of views from the left and right of the modern spectrum - and defy categorization in modern terms. The 1940s especially have whole political parties with ideas embraced by the modern right (nationalism) and the modern left (socialism). Applying revisionist history principles to make a certain political party your hero throughout the ages risks creating an overly-tribal mentality that needlessly treats people you disagree with on domestic policy as enemies.
I think we should all step back, remember that we're Americans first, and focus on how to address those issues together.
(0)
Reply
(0)
A1C Charles Lawrence
A1C Charles Lawrence
>1 y
Thanks Captain but I do resent someone talking about the "crimes " of the liberals and then equating them with the Confederates. I have studied the Civil War for a good many years and most historians, define liberals as those that wanted change and Conservatives as those that did not, and its clear that Lincoln was considered radical because of the changes he wanted. It is also true that those that did not want change, the Conservatives, that bolted from the Union when they did not accept the results of the election of 1860. There is not a single historian anywhere who would say Lincoln and the Abolitionists were Conservatives.

As for states rights, the Democrats of the period were interested in states rights only to the degree that they could use that to defend slavery. They had no problem with states rights in demanding the Federal government enforce the Fugitive Slave law and demanding governors of Northern States be arrested for aggitating on the slave question.
At the time of the war all southernerns including Jefferson Davis and every single state that left the union said it was the threat to slave system that was the reason for the revolt. States rights argument is just a pleasant face for the actual reason. The desire to preserve slavery..a system which they all openly agreed was far superior to any otther

Also you are correct in saying that Republicans voted for the Civil rights act on 1965 in greater numbers than the Democrats. I have heard this before but what is not said is that because of that vote, the Dixicrats left the Democratic party and joined the Repubicans.
And to suggest the modern left embraces socialism is like saying the modern right embraces the KKK.. You are talking complete nonsense based on the actions of a few.

None of this is revisionism. These are well established facts
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
You have been given the authority to change three things in your branch or DoD wide … What are they?
CW4 Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations Technician
11
11
0
Eliminate ALL gender differences. If a female soldier is able to avoid a deployment and a PCS move due to pregnancy, then allow a male soldier who's wife is pregnant the same benefit. PT Test requirements the same across the board. I'm not saying make it harder for females or easier for males, just make one standard and let that be that. Equal pay for equal work. "But Chief, if they do that then every married Soldier in a unit set to deploy will get their wives pregnant!" So how is that any different than when a female soldier does the same? I guess its something the Army will have to figure out.
(11)
Comment
(0)
CW4 Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations Technician
CW4 (Join to see)
>1 y
PO2 Deborah Burr - I don't think anyone questions how difficult it is for a woman to give birth. We live in a military that is all about equality and one that claims families are important.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PO2 Deborah Burr
PO2 Deborah Burr
>1 y
CW4 (Join to see) - Something I would have considered once I decided to become a parent is to allow a temporary one year release from the service due to childbirth. A furlough, so to speak. Might be able to retain some strong and intelligent women that way.

A shout out to MSG Carol Puskedra.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPL Wilfred Roberge
CPL Wilfred Roberge
>1 y
I was told by a female about another female we both knew from a prior unit of her actually getting artificially inseminated to avoid deployment, she was AGR (Active Guard Reserve, AGR's are typically careerists).
Another soldier (I am an 88n, he was an 88n, he came from an MCT in Germany off of Active Duty, female in his unit came up prenant just prior to deployment, so she was cross-leveled to another MCT and replaced that that MCT's soldier, when they returned to home station they all expected her to meet them with her baby, they asked where it was, she said "I got it aborted." Well She stayed with the second MCT since it was set to go over so she got pregnant AGAIN and baby # 2 was aborted too according to my friend.
Unfortunately, these two soldiers, if these stories are to be believed, especially #2 are horrible. I hope #1 is at least enjoying her kid.
Children are a blessing (I have 2).
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT John Hamby
SGT John Hamby
>1 y
CPL Wilfred Roberge - if that is the case, then that soldier should be chaptered out of the military on an UnSat Performance
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGM Mikel Dawson
9
9
0
1. Restart MOS SQT testing and make it a major factor in promotions
2. Restart the Army ranks of SPC 5-8. Not everyone is a leader and those people shouldn't be placed in the position of failure.
3. Stop wasting so much money on uniforms - how come the Marines can get a dress uniform loooooking good and the Army can't?
(9)
Comment
(0)
SSG Dennis Grossmann
SSG Dennis Grossmann
>1 y
Awesome suggestions. If the Spc 5-8 ranks were still around I could have gone higher.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Dennis Grossmann
SSG Dennis Grossmann
>1 y
I being my smart assed self, found out my PSG barely passed his SQT, and I got a 90+ would constantly rub it in his face.... Extra duty was well worth it.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGM Mikel Dawson
SGM Mikel Dawson
>1 y
SSG Dennis Grossmann - For me the extra duty would be worth the rub!!
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Dennis Grossmann
SSG Dennis Grossmann
>1 y
SGM Mikel Dawson - He also failed the Sgt Morales board. I overheard him and a few of his ass kissers talking about him getting his 8. You could have heard a pin drop when I said "How the Hell do you expect to make 8 after you bombed the Sgt Morales board." Yeah, that Motor Pool was spotless after a week or so.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Infantryman
7
7
0
Get rid of weight standards if someone passes the APFT...
False sexual harassment claims get prosecuted.
ACTUALLY train to standard, not time.
(7)
Comment
(0)
SSG Aircraft Powerplant Repairer
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
Less than 1% of sexual harassment claims are found to be false. That's why so many get "prosecuted"
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Infantryman
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
SSG (Join to see) - A female falsely accused me of something, I was investigated, my promotion and schools were held up, and I temporarily had a bar to re-enlistment. This isn't 1%, this was my reality. She wasn't prosecuted. My career never recovered. She continued on as a victim who "didn't push the charges." The accusation alone hurt more than 1%.
(2)
Reply
(0)
CPL Wilfred Roberge
CPL Wilfred Roberge
>1 y
SGT (Join to see) - It's like that episode of Family Guy where Brian goes to college and asks the blond for a pen or pencil in the class and gets maced or pepper sprayed.... sometimes you can't even talk to someone without them feeling they've been wronged somehow... Brian with pepperspray, you with charges...
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Dennis Grossmann
SSG Dennis Grossmann
>1 y
CPL Wilfred Roberge - Right around TailHook and SMA McKinneys Sexual Harassment charge, you couldn't sneeze around some (with no disrespect to females meant) females because they knew that the military didn't want any more negative attention, and would side with the female. He'll I had one try to press charges on me because I refused to carry her toolbox.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Michael Peterson
6
6
0
1. I would end "Political Correctness" swiftly and ruthlessly. I would put it in the same category as treason, subversion, and espionage. Violators would be subject to trial be Courts Martial and, the minimum sentence would be 20 years in prison. You should not have to worry about hurting someone's delicate feelings while your job is deploying to a hostile location to engage in combat with an armed enemy who wishes to kill you. Focus on critical war fighting tasks rather than "mandatory sensitivity training". Harsh words killed no one ever and, if you get destroyed over words, combat is definitely not the place for you.
2. All major policy or uniform changes would have to pass a board, with a two thirds approval, of Soldiers comprised of three personnel of each of the following categories: Field Grade Officers, Company Grade Officers, Senior NCO's and, Junior NCO's. If it's a bad idea, like the black beret or the last great tattoo policy, it will most likely fail here.
3. I would do away with gender specific standards. There would be ONE standard across the board. No Soldier should have to put their life in the hands of another who is not required to meet the same standards in training.
(6)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Engineer Officer
MAJ (Join to see)
>1 y
Every sentence of this!
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSG John Wirts
MSG John Wirts
>1 y
I will comment that now in a time of scarce funding, service specific utility uniform we should never allow, especially not a copyrighted MARINE MULTI CAM utility uniform. A joint service panel of officer and enlisted from each service should be convened and told to adopt a utility uniform for all services, with the only differences allowed would be a male and female uniform. That uniform should remain until a good reason change it comes about. Not just fashion statements!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Chief Of Public Affairs And Protocol
6
6
0
Edited >1 y ago
Maybe a Draft? The American people need to have skin in the game again. As it stands the military is a "video game" the People watch on TV when we have an action. Not my kid? Why NOT your kid?
(6)
Comment
(0)
Sgt John de Nugent
Sgt John de Nugent
>1 y
Amen, brother. 1) The politicians can send professionals off much more easily to a hare-brained war, not draftees where mom and dad will start asking hard questions (like Why does my son need to die seven thousand miles away?); 2) I taught high school and by 17 75% of these boys (and girls) have no dad in the house and no stern male role model. The youth today need military discipline and respect taught to them, lose the attitude and stop thinking they are hot sh--t because they have a pulse and wear sunglasses.
(4)
Reply
(0)
CPL Wilfred Roberge
CPL Wilfred Roberge
>1 y
Sgt John de Nugent - Well said, my dad died when I was 11 and it has been 26 years, my mom never remarried or dated, I had uncles, a grandfather, and various guys I looked up to but I think I suffered for not having it and I think the military gave me much of what I needed when I joined (not to discount the job my Mom did, she is my hero).
(1)
Reply
(0)
SPC(P) Brian Brown
SPC(P) Brian Brown
>1 y
How about just a draft for the politician's kids that are sending soldiers off to war? After all, even with a draft, their kids aren't going. Just look at Dick Cheney and Donald Trump, 4 time deferment?
(0)
Reply
(0)
LTC Special Forces Officer
LTC (Join to see)
>1 y
Go further, A National Service program. Either 2 years in the military or a Government
social service organization. No exceptions.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW2 William Jones
6
6
0
Bring back discipline, Allow NCOs to scuff up soldiers that need it, and stop funding needless uniform changes. (If I had a fourth, I would reduce the raw number of PCS's allowing more continuity of training and stabilization at one station as well as reducing the cost to move them all over the world every few years.)
(6)
Comment
(0)
Capt Michael Greene
Capt Michael Greene
>1 y
While I understand the cost and stabilization problems of PCSing, training and familiarization is what PCSing is all about--that, and preventing homesteading overseas. Overseas returnees drive the assignment system, and they shouldn't stay too long: some become corrupt, some become emperors of their duty station, inventing their own chains of command and selfish policies. Instead, we give everyone a chance to orient themselves to new places and jobs, keeping the services flexible and trained.
(0)
Reply
(0)
A1C Jeff D.
A1C Jeff D.
>1 y
I wanted to move around while in the Air Force, after a great overseas tour, I got stuck in a shithole stateside for 5 years.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Joseph Weber
5
5
0
Stop wasting so much dang money, comfortable boots, and comfortable boots.
(5)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close