Avatar feed
Responses: 18
MSG Stan Hutchison
9
9
0
Remember when the Republicans main target was Russia?
(9)
Comment
(0)
SP5 Norman McGill
SP5 Norman McGill
>1 y
Not at all MSgt Hutchison. Actually I've looked that term up and the definition of Qanon is very vague to say the least. It appears that even they don't know what they stand for so I can't say that I am for them or against them.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
MSG Stan Hutchison
>1 y
SP5 Norman McGill - I do not know what they "stand" for but I do know all they spout is far-fetched conspiracy theories. Like: " Biden might just capitulate and let the bastards take us over."
(1)
Reply
(0)
SP5 Norman McGill
SP5 Norman McGill
>1 y
Ohhhh! I see what you mean Stan. My saying that isn't any worse than what the democraps are usually spouting about the Republicans. I doubt that even Biden would be that stupid but who knows what he'd do if there was enough money in it for him. I'm way more concerned with the people in this country who seem to think that Socialism is preferable to a democratic Republic and that includes our noble statesmen known as congressmen and women. I think the Russians are the least of our problems right now.
(0)
Reply
(0)
1SG Jeffrey Mullett
1SG Jeffrey Mullett
>1 y
SP5 Norman McGill - Apparently you don't know what socialism is. We have a lot of Social programs...do you have VA life insurance, or a Service related disability, or Retirement from the government? NO? If you do, you are taking advantage of a government social program that assists military personnel who served their country. That's Socialism. Just an example.
I would appreciate it if you used a little common courtesy when addressing "Democraps" because a LOT of us are.
The military is a social program. Our taxes pay for it. YOU receive money from the military, so you, by default are a Welfare case.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
7
7
0
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel solid read and share Brother William.
(7)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
7
7
0
Entirely plausable theofy.
(7)
Comment
(0)
SP5 Norman McGill
SP5 Norman McGill
>1 y
Yes sir Colonel Christensen it is all entirely plausible but it's hardly even a theory. I see no proof of any of these actions. Just more fake news from the left.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
>1 y
SP5 Norman McGill Somehow think financial records in the hands of NY investigators will flesh out the theory.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SP5 Norman McGill
SP5 Norman McGill
>1 y
Good point sir. I don't blame Trump for not wanting his financial info to be out in the public. Maybe it will be and maybe not but I have yet to hear just what the charges are against Trump and why his money matters are in question. Unless he has done something really underhanded it's nobodies business how much he makes. However an investigation into Nancy Pelosi and a lot of other government officials is certainly in order. None of them have to disclose their finances so why should Trump? And how do these officials become so wealthy while in office? Now there's a good question. Trump was already rich before he went into office so it isn't like he could be bought easily. As you say, it will be interesting to see what transpires with this investigation. If anything.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
>1 y
PV2 Larry Sellnow And that was before he got into politics!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close