Benghazi committee seeks 'transcribed' interview with Clinton over deleted records

Yes, we will always have those won't we?

I think this time it will be about motivating people to vote. Six years ago, they had a gimmick that was successful, had people running to vote. I don't think she will receive the same kind of energy from the voters, especially not from people who consider themselves independent voters. That's my opinion anyway.

Ordinarilly, I'd like to give a (former) high official the benefit of the doubt. That she would be working in the best interests of the American people, and the exact manner in which she did the duty is not necessarily for the general public.
Mrs Clinton, however has quite a track record of subterfuge and questionable dealings that date back to before she was the First Lady of Arkansas. I smell smoke, and where there is smoke...

That's right 1SG (Join to see) all the way back to Watergate.

Here is a question for you . What is the path of information . is it passed up chain first ? or down the chain ? How many hands is it passed tough ? when you ask about time lines and who would have blood on their hands . Who really controls the money and assets ? You need to look at the Congress and Senate to find the bloody hands .

Bahahaha! The Congress wouldn't have allowed 5 Gitmo Detainees That DO have blood on their hands to be released. Soldiers died searching for a traitor. This is secret information shared through a private phone line and or computer. She ERASED EVERYTHING! If it were up to congress, they would've sent the SF that were just a mile away into that battle in Benghazi but for some reason, someone in the WHITE HOUSE gave the order to stand down. How can you blame congress for something they didn't know?? Or the house?? To hell with it all, it is Bush's fault.

That qualifies every political candidate!!

Well said @Veronica Fulgham-Blais

Hilarious MAJ Petarca.

But who's stopping you? Keep going!! Lol

Yeah, that's it. Keep going. (-;