Posted on Jun 26, 2016
Weapons of the Vietnam War - Vietnam War - HISTORY.com
10.1K
79
22
21
21
0
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 11
Nice Article. There were however some things that were left out, maybe due to length restrictions.
The M-16 when first issued was a big mistake as it hadn't been fully vetted. It had many issued, that when exposed, could and did in many cases , get the weapons owner killed or wounded. Although it had a selector switch most people fire it on it's semi-auto mode so as to save ammo. Basic load for the weapon was 200 rounds and most carried more if they could. The magazine was also untested as it jammed a lot if fully loaded. The M-48 tank was used in the jungles during the dry season but was pretty much road bound the rest of the time. We carried 4 different rounds, HE,WP,HEAT and Canister/beehive. The Canister rounds were the best anti-personnel rounds for close in protection with its 250 meter range and it fired steel pellets and the Beehive used Flechettes. You forgot to mention the Claymore mine, it was a god send to the Infantry and Base Camp/position defense.
The M-551 Sheridan, which replaced the M-48 in Cav Units was another POS that the Army failed to fully vet before sending into Combat. It's armor was no better then the M-113 Personnel Carrier and if it hit a mine, it was toast. The M-48 I had hit 7 mines over it's life time and no one was ever hurt and we had one of our M-48's take 4 Anti-tank rounds and again no one was hurt, before they had to abandon the vehicle due to the fire from the fuel tank burning.
Lastly, Agent Orange was used by our Government to kill the vegetation the the enemy used to hide from us. Someone had to know what the results on people and animals it would have. my god it had a part of the chemical makeup one of the worlds worst chemical, DIOXIN. We used chemical weapons on our enemy and then had our own people go into the same area and, without protective gear, spend time. In the case of Armor Units, we stirred up the stuff and we breathed it is. NO ONE ever had to answer to the American Service men/women for that crime against humanity.
The M-16 when first issued was a big mistake as it hadn't been fully vetted. It had many issued, that when exposed, could and did in many cases , get the weapons owner killed or wounded. Although it had a selector switch most people fire it on it's semi-auto mode so as to save ammo. Basic load for the weapon was 200 rounds and most carried more if they could. The magazine was also untested as it jammed a lot if fully loaded. The M-48 tank was used in the jungles during the dry season but was pretty much road bound the rest of the time. We carried 4 different rounds, HE,WP,HEAT and Canister/beehive. The Canister rounds were the best anti-personnel rounds for close in protection with its 250 meter range and it fired steel pellets and the Beehive used Flechettes. You forgot to mention the Claymore mine, it was a god send to the Infantry and Base Camp/position defense.
The M-551 Sheridan, which replaced the M-48 in Cav Units was another POS that the Army failed to fully vet before sending into Combat. It's armor was no better then the M-113 Personnel Carrier and if it hit a mine, it was toast. The M-48 I had hit 7 mines over it's life time and no one was ever hurt and we had one of our M-48's take 4 Anti-tank rounds and again no one was hurt, before they had to abandon the vehicle due to the fire from the fuel tank burning.
Lastly, Agent Orange was used by our Government to kill the vegetation the the enemy used to hide from us. Someone had to know what the results on people and animals it would have. my god it had a part of the chemical makeup one of the worlds worst chemical, DIOXIN. We used chemical weapons on our enemy and then had our own people go into the same area and, without protective gear, spend time. In the case of Armor Units, we stirred up the stuff and we breathed it is. NO ONE ever had to answer to the American Service men/women for that crime against humanity.
(12)
(0)
SSgt Boyd Herrst
SFC David Xanten ; Testing time was not s’thing they wanted to allow for .. there were so many different priorities .. what was going to be done first?...
(0)
(0)
SPC Lyle Montgomery
SSG Xanten I was in a leg infantry batalion. We never rode on tanks or APC's. Sorry that I didn't mention them. I was one of our troops who was sprayed with agent orange from our Army helicopters. You did a good job of listing things that I didn't
(0)
(0)
SPC Lyle Montgomery
SMSgt Lawrence McCarter - Right I remember that We never saw a 30 rount clip fpr a m16. Guys would tape another 20 round mag upside to the one in their rifle so when empty they would flip it over and have a full clip with 18 rounds in each clip
(0)
(0)
SMSgt Lawrence McCarter
SPC Lyle Montgomery - True, I never saw a 30 round magazine either and We also only loaded 18 rounds in the 20 round magazine as 20 rounds would weaken the spring and the magazine would not feed right and jam. At first many blamed the weapon itself and made manufacturing modifications where the problem was simply the spring in the magazine right along wasn't durable enough. We were issued 15 magazines but could get as many as We wanted with no problem which We did. I kept the moving parts well oiled and never had a misfeed and did only load 18 rounds into the 20 round magazine.
(0)
(0)
Thanks for sharing SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL yes the weapons of the Vietnam War "were more devastating than those of any previous conflict" except for the atomic bomb!
While we understood many of the effects of weapons were learned the hard way about the long term impact of Agent Orange and other defoliants.
Similarly we learned the hard way about weapons and agents used in Desert Storm and probably will for OEF as well.
While we understood many of the effects of weapons were learned the hard way about the long term impact of Agent Orange and other defoliants.
Similarly we learned the hard way about weapons and agents used in Desert Storm and probably will for OEF as well.
(11)
(0)
SFC Joe S.Davis Jr., MSM DSL-Thanks for the post “weapons of the Vietnam War “having used some of these weapons and being in the close proximity of others during my tour it is always interesting to hear others comments both good and bad and their experiences, great post as usual
(5)
(0)
SPC Lyle Montgomery
No one mentioned C4. I loved to blow up stuff with it also used it to heat our c rations.
(0)
(0)
SMSgt Lawrence McCarter
SPC Lyle Montgomery - Something else We used on our perimeter at DaNang in 1968-69 were the Claymores. We actually had a small control panel with toggle switches mounted on a small piece of plywood so We could select which sections of the mines to have explode. There were guys that did cook with C4 and at least get some hot gourmet C Rats. (which I never want to eat ever again as long as I live!" Another way of getting hot chow was We had a jeep coming around to perimeter post bringing coffee and water. We would lif the hood and put C rats on top of the manifold and once the hood was put back down it held the cans in place and that heated up the cans which We ate after the jeep returned again. I'd even tried gun cleaning solvent which actually burned pretty well in an empty C rat can while I heated one with food in it over the little stove that provided. It did ok with beef slice as there were three and I usually threw the top one away as it got kind of oily.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next