Do you believe that "Radicalized Military Vets" are a true threat to the Nation?

This is just more of the poisonous rhetoric from the far left that seeks the destruction of everything American and everything that is free about this nation. An asinine suggestion that people so dedicated to defending the founding principals and articles of this country could be considered "a threat" to the country...well, maybe a threat to terrorist and traitorous entities within the far left as what they seek is dissolution of the constitutional rights, yes, I would state unequivocally we are a threat to enemies of the constitution. Don't be an enemy then there is no threat.

I'm in that spectrum: my oath hasn't expired nor have I been relieved of my allegiance thereto... AMERICA must survive, the extremists won't save HER so that responsibility falls to me and those who feel as I do that this AMERICA will survive if the grassroots stand for this last bastion of FREEDOM on Earth.

No, just liberals.

If you want to see Radicalized Military Vets...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonus_Army


Be sure to read far enough to note the names of the military heroes who routed the protestors.

Not nearly as much as Radicalized Social Justice Warriors and WOKE politicians.

sounds like drivel from a "RADICALIZED" liberal, socialist left that doesn't understand how the world really works.

Sometimes what we think is true or we believe is true becomes fact. That is especially true on social media. Some will read something that has been stated on social media, and without any verification share it with good intentions, but only to find out it wasn't true, yet some who read it never learn that it wasn't true. I think that is something we all want to avoid.

We have individuals that were influenced to participate in J6 that were military veterans or currently in uniform. I would suggest that many of them would not have gone that way on most days. Some who were accused were found not guilty and some were found guilty, some with lesser charges and some for insurrection. Regardless of your view of J6 being good or bad, it was not a day that I think historians will view positively, but that is just MHO. I could be completely wrong.

The real reason I am writing this post is to share with those who are interested that there is a site I used to evaluate media outlets. It is MediaBiasFactCheck.com. Some of the media outlets will be just the opposite of what you might think would be true, and that is true on both the Left and Right. It will tell you a lot of things about their reporting, especially accuracy. I use it to help me determine who seems to be reporting accurately and who may not be accurate, or so biased that accuracy is secondary to the agenda, which we hear so much about.

I hope those who are interested will find this site to be of value. It has been for me, a person who has little to no interest in political parties, although I once did. I think I stopped having interest when I started paying close attention to what they did versus what they said. Save a few, very high profile subjects, I found they were not that much different on either side when it was all said and done. I clearly realize that many will disagree with that view. I respect every person's view, regardless of whether I can agree with it or not.

Nope

Clearly.

https://www.npr.org/2021/01/21/958915267/nearly-one-in-five-defendants-in-capitol-riot-cases-served-in-the-military

I believe what this article points out.

"Charlie Sadoff’s documentary details how a collection of anti-government white-nationalist movements have increasingly gained traction inside our borders, often by strategically recruiting those committed to protecting the nation: law enforcement and military service members."