Posted on Jan 20, 2021
Do you support the new commander in chief? Why or why not?
18.9K
1.67K
673
230
230
0
Posted in these groups: 
Office of the President (POTUS)
Election 2020
Office of the President (POTUS) Election 2020
Posted 5 y ago
Responses: 221
119
119
0
I support him in principle. I hope his presidency results in a better America. I am not in favor of most of his vision of America as expressed on his campaign web site. In particular I have problems with his economic policy, his energy policy, his intentions on the 2nd Amendment, and what I believe to be a predilection for the "Nanny-state" over American individualism.
(119)
(0)
SSG Elbert Thomas
Cpl Ricardo Munoz - Well, we have an old saying were I work. The bullsh*t is getting deep in here. What's next, you were a CEO of a Bank?
(2)
(0)
Maj John Bell
Cpl Ricardo Munoz - Let me get this straight. You are a trust fund baby, one of the wealthiest 1% in America. You're a systems analyst with multiple certifications, at Citi, and simultaneously a practicing attorney at Ballard Partners. Your family owns half of the firm, but you're not listed as one of the firms attorney's. But you are a rebel who would rather work at the post office than do what mommy and daddy tell you to do. But you got your J.D. to please mommy.
Attorneys need to have excellent correspondence skills, but you have demonstrated an inadequate grasp of punctuation, capitalization, sentence structure, paragraph structure, logic sequence. Attorneys also need basic argumentative skills: citation and documentation, questioning, contextual control, contradiction detection, argument partition, argumentative wisdom. You clearly haven't demonstrated any level of competence. You argumentation consists of logical fallacies and ad hominem attacks.
I suggest you go to the nearest community college and take a course in maintaining continuity when writing fiction.
I think I've wrung the last bit of funny from this.
Good day.
Attorneys need to have excellent correspondence skills, but you have demonstrated an inadequate grasp of punctuation, capitalization, sentence structure, paragraph structure, logic sequence. Attorneys also need basic argumentative skills: citation and documentation, questioning, contextual control, contradiction detection, argument partition, argumentative wisdom. You clearly haven't demonstrated any level of competence. You argumentation consists of logical fallacies and ad hominem attacks.
I suggest you go to the nearest community college and take a course in maintaining continuity when writing fiction.
I think I've wrung the last bit of funny from this.
Good day.
(1)
(0)
Maj James Tippins
Cpl Ricardo Munoz - If you insult anyone in your comments, I will contact the moderators and have you removed. Thank you.
(0)
(0)
Cpl Ricardo Munoz
Maj James Tippins - Don't threaten me!!! People want to talk politics but do not want to hear other peoples opinions. If you do not like the way I talk don't listen. When you do report me give them entire feed of the conversation Major, but don't threat me across your keyboard. Thank you.
(1)
(0)
He is the President. I swore an oath the Constitution and to follow the orders of all Officers above me and the POTUS. Regardless of how I feel about him, I will do the Soldierly thing by moving forward and follow all legal and valid orders.
(96)
(0)
SSG Elbert Thomas
SSgt James Jones - I feel sorry for you, to still believe that lie told by the media. Here this from Snopes, "After this, we’re going to walk down — and I’ll be there with you — we’re going to walk down, we’re going to walk down — anyone you want, but I think right here — we’re going to walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women. And we’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them. Because you’ll never take back our country with weakness, you have to show strength, and you have to be strong. We have come to demand that Congress do the right thing, and only count the electors who have been lawfully slated — lawfully slated. I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard today."
" In short, the president called on supporters to “peacefully and patriotically” march or walk to the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, to urge members of the senate to defy the Electoral College vote in a constitutionally mandated procedure to affirm Biden’s win, without using the words “storm” or “breach” or “break into” the federal building."
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-tell-supporters-storm/
" In short, the president called on supporters to “peacefully and patriotically” march or walk to the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, to urge members of the senate to defy the Electoral College vote in a constitutionally mandated procedure to affirm Biden’s win, without using the words “storm” or “breach” or “break into” the federal building."
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-tell-supporters-storm/
(0)
(0)
Sgt Pete Kondrosky
SSG Elbert Thomas -
YOU actually BELIEVE the SOROS -owned Snopes?...FIGURES!...typical liberal! Try some actual NON-Soros RESEARCH, and NOT facebook. Be CAREFUL...as THAT (research) requires some actual reading/literacy...hmmm...
YOU actually BELIEVE the SOROS -owned Snopes?...FIGURES!...typical liberal! Try some actual NON-Soros RESEARCH, and NOT facebook. Be CAREFUL...as THAT (research) requires some actual reading/literacy...hmmm...
(0)
(0)
Sgt Pete Kondrosky
You used SNOPES???!!!..SERIOUISLY??? Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?!...over
The commie/socialist/democrat puppet master Soros, owns Snopes...subsequently VERY socialist/leftist leaning. Try wikpedia...
The commie/socialist/democrat puppet master Soros, owns Snopes...subsequently VERY socialist/leftist leaning. Try wikpedia...
(0)
(0)
Yes, why would we not? I am not a fan of anybody who wishes failure on our own leaders. I am not in the same political party as he is but I hope he does well.
(47)
(0)
SP6 Greg Jetter
Why would you not ? , how about the fact that Biden is up to his ass in bribes and under the influence of the Chinese Communist Party ? guess that is ok with you ?
(3)
(0)
SSG Michael Montoya
The policies he is pushing for definitely leave me wishing for failure on his agendas, but I will hope for him to do well in the people's interest in freedom and less intrusive government.
(0)
(0)
Maj John Bell
Cpl Ricardo Munoz - Nonsense. Your statement is so utterly without merit that you no longer have any credibility. Now, are you a systems analyst at Citi, a lawyer at Ballard, a Nobel laureate, or a greeter at WalMart?
(3)
(0)
34
34
0
If one is still in uniform. Whether I support the CINC is not an issue. Otherwise, as a retired one, so far I am not impressed.
(34)
(0)
MSG John Endersbe
I served under Nixon, Carter, and Clinton. I thank god I’m not serving now. The current secdef is running a purge and I suspect all you need to do is suggest a fellow soldier is a conservative to end their career.
(1)
(0)
LTC Ken Connolly
This is what happen when a briefcase general is in charge. Focuses on BS and not the people in his command's ability to annihilate the enemy, because the clown doesn't have a clue.
(0)
(0)
31
31
0
He was elected out of hatred for the previous commander in chief more than in support of the disastrous policies - both foreign and domestic - that he espouses. While I recognize his position, I greatly fear the results his administration has already had on our country, and the results of those policies he says he is intending to enact.
Fortunately I am no longer in a position to have to carry out any of his orders, but if I were I would carry out my orders to the best of my ability. Professionalism demands no less.
Fortunately I am no longer in a position to have to carry out any of his orders, but if I were I would carry out my orders to the best of my ability. Professionalism demands no less.
(31)
(0)
SP6 Greg Jetter
Capt Gregory Prickett - no he was not . and your on the side of communist for supporting his lame ass.
(2)
(0)
24
24
0
I have lived in the UK since 96' so I suppose I definitely come at it from a different slant as for the life of me, I do not understand how ANY military personnel could possibly be ok with how this Commander in Thief came into the WH...When I left the States, we wery still a very patriotic country who no chance in hell would ever spit on, set fire to or kneel before and stand upon Ole Glory...I have two brothers who I sadly no longer have anything in common..The younger is full of hate and a NorCal liberal, and the other is a retired cop in Wisconsin who relied on CNN for his news. Neither could stand back, ignore PRESIDENT Trump's New York fervor and focus on his amazing successes...
First time in my life a president was massively successful and yet was ALLOWED to have the Presidency swindled from him....Witnesses, Whistleblowers, recovered junked mail, proof of the dead being allowed to vote, and video evidence just to name a few and yet this suspect Supreme Court allowed it to be ignored.....My Wisconsin Absentee vote was discounted and yeah I am very bitter..You only need compare google to duckduckgo on Trump's Presidential Accomplishments to see how much big tech was involved..Support either Biden or Harris..hell no is the politest way possible to put my thoughts...So much more, but the intense stress due to this insanity is not worth rehashing completely without any chance of real deal justice....
Guessing like me, many of you were raised by your coaches and gym teachers that Winners never cheat, and Cheaters never win....This WH has proven that no longer holds true sadly....Most of my life Americans could brag we were the free-est, bravest and most patriotic nation on Earth...How many actually believe that still holds true with these socialist-loving globalists in charge???
First time in my life a president was massively successful and yet was ALLOWED to have the Presidency swindled from him....Witnesses, Whistleblowers, recovered junked mail, proof of the dead being allowed to vote, and video evidence just to name a few and yet this suspect Supreme Court allowed it to be ignored.....My Wisconsin Absentee vote was discounted and yeah I am very bitter..You only need compare google to duckduckgo on Trump's Presidential Accomplishments to see how much big tech was involved..Support either Biden or Harris..hell no is the politest way possible to put my thoughts...So much more, but the intense stress due to this insanity is not worth rehashing completely without any chance of real deal justice....
Guessing like me, many of you were raised by your coaches and gym teachers that Winners never cheat, and Cheaters never win....This WH has proven that no longer holds true sadly....Most of my life Americans could brag we were the free-est, bravest and most patriotic nation on Earth...How many actually believe that still holds true with these socialist-loving globalists in charge???
(24)
(0)
SGT Frank-John Limiero
SFC James J. Palmer IV aka "JP4" You and the like are no different from major social forums. You ask for opinions and then decide if it’s acceptable to print. Sad what has become of “freedom of speech” when decided by millennium thinkers.
(0)
(0)
MSgt (Join to see)
SGT Frank-John Limiero - Conduct Unbecoming of a RallyPoint member.
Any member who displays the following content may have their posts or accounts immediately removed:
1. Any discussion where members communicate in an egregiously unprofessional manner. As a general rule, if it would not be said in a conversation with your NCO/Commander, it should not be said on RallyPoint. This includes content that is racist, sexist, obscene, or personally attacking others. It's important to share differing views on RallyPoint without losing the professionalism the military is known for upholding.
2. Any member who trolls others. "Trolling" is defined here as participating in a discussion that appears to have the primary goal of bothering, annoying, attacking, insulting or aggravating other members, or groups, instead of adding value to the community.
3. Imagery showing nudity or sexually suggestive content, content that contains demonstrations of self-harm or violence, or content displaying criminal activity.
4. Any language which is disrespectful, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, or prejudiced against individuals or entire groups of people in the community. https://rallypoint.force.com/Support/s/article/rallypoint-answers-and-discussion-conduct-2020-03-13-10-21-35
Any member who displays the following content may have their posts or accounts immediately removed:
1. Any discussion where members communicate in an egregiously unprofessional manner. As a general rule, if it would not be said in a conversation with your NCO/Commander, it should not be said on RallyPoint. This includes content that is racist, sexist, obscene, or personally attacking others. It's important to share differing views on RallyPoint without losing the professionalism the military is known for upholding.
2. Any member who trolls others. "Trolling" is defined here as participating in a discussion that appears to have the primary goal of bothering, annoying, attacking, insulting or aggravating other members, or groups, instead of adding value to the community.
3. Imagery showing nudity or sexually suggestive content, content that contains demonstrations of self-harm or violence, or content displaying criminal activity.
4. Any language which is disrespectful, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, or prejudiced against individuals or entire groups of people in the community. https://rallypoint.force.com/Support/s/article/rallypoint-answers-and-discussion-conduct-2020-03-13-10-21-35
(1)
(0)
MSgt (Join to see)
That was the first to pop up when I searched. Figured it served the purpose. Also what would you think about removing that picture of President Biden on the dog leach. Personally I don't care for it. But thought I would get another opinion.
(0)
(0)
19
18
1
yes he brings new hope to our country and new direction that a lot of people like
(19)
(1)
SGT (Join to see)
Let me hear you say that when they come knocking on your door for all your guns magazines and ammo.
(3)
(0)
SGT Kevin Gardner
I have no problem explaining why I give someone a down vote. In the case of your reply it seems that reality is not a place you live in. I would go so far as to say you probably don’t visit it much either. Others have posted their reply’s to you and I echo their sentiments.
(1)
(0)
13
13
0
Sir, I feel you asked your question trying to trick people here. Everyone knows that it does not matter who is the President, they are the commander in chief. We may not like who that commander in chief is but we have to support them, the constitution, and the officers appointed over us. Now if they try and force us to do something that is against the constitution, then that is a different story. I hated that my discharge/retirement order was signed by Pres. Obama because I did not agree with his policies for this nation nor the direction he took us down, but I still had to adhere to the oath I took to defend this nation and the constitution while I was in uniform, no matter who was the president. BTW that made me think of how many presidents did I serve under, I served from the Carter administration to Obama so that was so 6 presidents, 3 dems, 3 republicans.
(13)
(0)
SPC Perry Gresham
In Two-Thirds of Election Lawsuits Where Merits Considered Decisions Are Favorable to Trump https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/trump-won-two-thirds-of-election-lawsuits-where-merits-considered_3688543.html
Download our app to read more at https://ept.ms/DownloadApp
Download our app to read more at https://ept.ms/DownloadApp
In Two-Thirds of Election Lawsuits Where Merits Considered Decisions Are Favorable to Trump
The claim often repeated by the mainstream media, social-media content moderators, and fact-checkers that lawsuits filed by President ...
(1)
(0)
SSG Bill McCoy
SMSgt Lawrence McCarter - Well state SMSgt! I agree and also hope he does a good job; BUT I DO worry. I worry that he may not be able to get through all four years and my concern is what kind of leader Harris would turn out to be. In her case, I think an argument for her Marxist-like views are valid and worrisome, at best. While I like most of what Trump did, and understand how others wanted him out, I think what was overlooked was Biden's age; the concerns of what many view as (possible) early dementia and ultimately, WHO would succeed him if he can't finish a full term.
(2)
(0)
SMSgt Lawrence McCarter
SSG Bill McCoy - I share Your concerns on those issues and for the same reasons. Harris also was taken out of the running very early on the Presidential primary as a very poor choice even by Her own party. Choosing Her for a running mate also seems like a very poor choice and it may well be by design to replace Biden with Marxist Socialism led by Her. She has a very poor public record of abuse of the Citizens of first Her own home state then on National level. Tulsi Gabbard (D) ,Hawaii (also was ARNG Major, now AFR Major, 17 years service including two Mid east tours) ) at the time certainly came right to the point and made that apparent about Harris. There can only be an ulterior motive and Biden may not even be sharp enough to know that although he Himself has a less than impressive record anyway even without any cognitive issues. I can expand including prior deception, plagiarism, lying and dishonest practices right through the House , the Senate and Vice Presidential office. He was also one of the members of Congress to sell Out the Republic of Vietnam in the early part of mid 1970s despite promises to them that thanks to him and other like Him were broken and funding, help everything deceased as did our credibility as a nation. Ronald Reagan restored a lot of that but it steadily came down after He left office bit by bit. I could go on but I tend to think You already got the points and understand it well.
(2)
(0)
12
12
0
CPL Larry Bezemer
Capt Gregory Prickett - I read it, did you miss the GRANTED AFTER THE COMPANY DISSOLVED PART!!!!!! I own two restaurants and I have applied for trademarked names for specific dishes and drinks. If I opened restaurants in Germany or China I would want to trademark them there as well, JUST LIKE the Trump org is doing...idiot! Get an education in business...........
(2)
(0)
11
11
0
No, he and his party have a long history of disdain for the military. The National Guard sleeping in a Capital parking garage last month is just the latest in a long line of examples.
(11)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google