Do you think the next war on American soil is going to be against "free" gun owners?

Not sure but I have prepared for it.

At this point, it's just not possible. We have roughly more guns than people, and only a fractional representation of military.

If 25% of the population owns guns (estimate), and on average owns 4+, but there is only 1% military representation, any war on gun owners would be ill advised.

Those that profess that there is a war against gun ownership are driving by fear and ignorance because they do not see the facts, 2016 compared to 1970's when conceal carried was heavily controlled and semi automatic weapons were not to be easily acquired.

To be honest, I think there are many people with public platforms in government and the media who would like nothing better than to make the USA a gun-free zone Cpl Anthony Pearson. They are vastly outnumbered by people who don't really care and and those who actually support the 2nd amendment of the US constitution and believe that responsible gun ownership is a constitutional right.
The government folks beating the drum for a gun-free america tend to be part of the group that believes the constitution needs to be reinterpreted with each new generation.
Declaring war by peaceniks is an oxymoron and I do not believe it will actually happen.

You would think that the horror of war, especially internecine war, would prevent any such eventuality, but we seem drawn to it like moths to a flame. Sadly, it appears that fear is drawing a plurality of Americans into the web of the tyrants and their agenda to disarm We the People. Thus, it grows increasingly doubtful that the trend will be stopped by the election of Representatives who will draw us back from that disaster. At present, the social conflict is great because the two sides are almost evenly divided. If one were dominant, there would be little discussion. However, if the anti-gun forces win a clear plurality and the pro-gun forces refuse to accept their judgment that we should surrender our right of self-defense, what choice is there other than open rebellion.

Keep in mind that rebellion does not require a majority. The American Revolution was fought within the Colonies by a population pretty evenly divided into thirds: One third Rebel, one third Tory, and one third let me hide in the woods and avoid the whole thing. Some of the fiercest battles of that Revolution were fought, not between Rebels and British regulars, but rather between Rebel and Tory (both sides Colonists). I don't expect we'll see a repeat of that since the anti-gun faction has disarmed themselves. They'll rely on the government to fight the battle for them if it comes to that.

Will the US military take up arms in this conflict? Now there's a question for another discussion...

Cpl Anthony Pearson I don't think that this will happen. I think that some sensible gun legislation is necessary and that the current laws should be enforced.

I truthfully don't see how we can prevent mass shootings by mentally ill individuals by legislating. Conversely I don't think that anyone on the no fly list should be allowed to purchase a gun.

No I don't believe our government is coming for the firearms in the hands of legal owners that are responsible. Keep in mind that in the 1930s through 40s all senior leaders in Japan feared a gun behind every blade of grass and in that era there were less firearm owners and less citizens than today because of population growth. I know a lot of law enforcement and all say that disarming the law abiding American would be a death sentence to law enforcement agencies both municipal state and federal. When free societies are ridden of firearms, criminals would soon run the leading country in the world.

I am not going to comment with any "certainty" on whether I believe "the government" is going to come after my guns or not. (What guns? I don't have any guns?...) What I will say is that, as a Soldier, I swore an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against ALL enemies, foreign and domestic".

That said, I would sooner stand WITH the People to defend our Constitutional rights, before I would stand AGAINST the People in armed conflict over rights guaranteed us by our Constitution.

Anyone who would deny that the current federal administration, as well as several state legislatures, have made several attempts at gun control (Connecticut "assault weapons" registration, NY "SAFE" Act, Operation Choke Point, BATFE proposed ban on 5.56/.223 ammunition, BATFE unlawful seizure of "80% lowers", etc.) over the past few years, is either woefully ignorant or willfully naïve.

Does that mean that they will begin going door-to-door to take your guns by force? I don't think so. Even the Feds aren't that foolish.

It's amazing to me, I have watched this play out, and a part of me has to laugh. I'll explain why... My sister posted a picture about a Mother, showing up to her daughters fist fight, with a pistol. Now, my sisters comment was this, "This just shows the "gun culture that we live in." Now, here is the problem in my eyes, ...A mother shows up to daughters fist fight... How in the fuck is that normal? But, the focus is on the fact she brought a pistol, not the fact the mother was at her daughters fist fight. This doesn't show me "Gun Culture" this shows me the problem is with "Thug Culture." And this is how they are going to bring everybody against gun owners, using deceit and misinformation. They will allow the criminals the upper hand, and then all hell is gonna break loose   

I have a hard time believing that a majority of the US military would fire on civilians who are defending their right to keep and bear arms.