1
1
0
AR 670-1 defines Fad(dish) as:
A transitory fashion adopted with wide enthusiasm.
Call me crazy, but this is very vague, especially when dealing with haircuts/styles.
So, fellow leaders out there, what is your definition of faddish?
A transitory fashion adopted with wide enthusiasm.
Call me crazy, but this is very vague, especially when dealing with haircuts/styles.
So, fellow leaders out there, what is your definition of faddish?
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 10
This is a definition by exception. It's not what it is, it's what it is not.
It's not "classic" or "traditional."
Although a "High & Tight" is extreme, it's traditional, therefore not faddish.
Skinny Jeans & Bell bottoms (excluding Naval uniform traditions) however would be considered faddish.
Part of this is evolution of words. Words change meaning over time, so what seems like a vague word today may have been a very specific word when it was first introduced into the regulations long ago.
It's not "classic" or "traditional."
Although a "High & Tight" is extreme, it's traditional, therefore not faddish.
Skinny Jeans & Bell bottoms (excluding Naval uniform traditions) however would be considered faddish.
Part of this is evolution of words. Words change meaning over time, so what seems like a vague word today may have been a very specific word when it was first introduced into the regulations long ago.
(4)
(0)
Suspended Profile
One word: Hipsters.
AR 670-1 gives leaders a lot (maybe too much) flexibility to enforce uniform and appearance standards. A squad leader can explain to his/her squad what he/she deems faddish, which should be nested with what the PSG deems faddish, which is nested with what the 1SG deems faddish, etc. etc. The commander is overall responsible for the discipline and good order of the unit but, NCOs enforce the standard (sometimes above what the commander deems acceptable).
(1)
(0)
I would say that this offers each command the chance to decide for themselves what is appropriate, it is in essence practicing mission command.
I would hope that we can move away from high and tights, they are faddish in my opinion. We are supposed to be a professional representation of the American people. Shouldn't we blend in a little?
I would hope that we can move away from high and tights, they are faddish in my opinion. We are supposed to be a professional representation of the American people. Shouldn't we blend in a little?
(1)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
Sir, I agree. They leave it to the inspectors version of what faddish is. They did the same with boots, "boots will be black and shined." I believe that was the wording in 670-1.
(0)
(0)
CSM (Join to see)
I hope we move away from medium fades with long sideburns, they are are faddish in my opinion i.e. A transitory fashion adopted with wide enthusiasm.
We should not blend in we should stand out and be recognizable to the American population. We are held to a higher higher standard than the majority of Americans, they should see that.
We should not blend in we should stand out and be recognizable to the American population. We are held to a higher higher standard than the majority of Americans, they should see that.
(1)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
CSM (Join to see) Why not stand out as a professional image of society that resembles it, instead of someone knowing from 300m out that this is a member of the military. The Special Operations community does their best to blend in with any community that they are a part of, within the parameters of regulations. I believe this is one thing that we could embrace that could benefit the larger military community.
In the end, I will support whatever the regulation even if I don't agree with it.
In the end, I will support whatever the regulation even if I don't agree with it.
(2)
(0)
CSM (Join to see)
I was messing with you sir. You haven't seen me lately, I will have to come into the annex one of these days and see you. I live on the RS but work in the Pink Palace with SFC (Join to see) .
(1)
(0)
I agree this word is Ambiguous in nature. Is it based on one's idea of fadddish. I say on thing is a fad while others would argue the opposite.
(0)
(0)
To me....does it look and maintain a professional look? If not, it's faddish!!
(0)
(0)
LCpl (Join to see)
But who’s to say what a professional look especially when it comes to hair. There are successful lawyers with braids in their heads and if that’s not a professional career then idk what is
(0)
(0)
It's unlike the Army to leave anything vague, so it's a little perturbing to us when they do, however, I think it's a good place to have a little grey. It's good to have the opportunity to exercise our minds, and use some common sense every now and then. I have used a variation of the haircut you see in my profile photo ever since I graduated OSUT and have been allowed to have hair. I recently decided to check online and see if I could find a hairstyle I thought might fit me better. Looking on some style website at hair parts, lo and behold I find out it's in style this year to part the hair on the side, but then shave the one side all the way up to the part. I think this is an example of such "faddish" hairstyles.
http://www.menshairstyletrends.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Shaved-part-ill_hana1.jpg?7ccf3d
http://www.menshairstyletrends.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Shaved-part-ill_hana1.jpg?7ccf3d
(0)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
The Army leaves a lot of things vague...if you look at a lot of doctrine and regulations it leave it open to interpretation from the local command.
(0)
(0)
SSgt (Join to see)
LTC (Join to see) I would counter that much of that leeway is more at your level, sir, than mine.
(0)
(0)
SSgt (Join to see)
SFC (Join to see) That's the reason for the mustache in my profile photo. I shaved it recently, but most of my enlisted time, I've maintained a just barely in regs nasty stache.
(0)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
SSgt (Join to see) I would say that it is even higher up, when doctrine or regulation leaves things open to the local command it is generally implied that it will go no lower than the Division-level, perhaps in small cases the Brigade-level.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Regulation


