Posted on Oct 9, 2018
How is it that most junior Soldiers claim to have never heard of Colin Powell or Norman Schwarzkopf, Jr?
22.7K
309
77
47
47
0
I occasionally ask Soldiers if they know who Colin Powell or Norman Schwarzkopf, Jr. is. I am no longer surprised that most 18-24 year old Soldiers I asked do not know. In fact, many of them have heard about Ronald Reagan but can’t engage in conversation about him. Even sadder, most don’t know there were two Presidents George Bush. They don’t know much about daddy, and not much more about W. Call me crazy, but it seems to me that the public schools are no longer teaching history from the 1980’s forward, not spending much time showing how those eras are related and inform today’s era, or the Army isn’t really teaching any Army history. Perhaps that’s not the Army’s job, to teach Soldiers their branch heritage. But you would think Soldiers who serve in this great Army would be able to engage in a 5 minute conversation about key political and military figures of their branch, from at least Desert Storm forward. I know I’m “old” but still think it’s better for Soldiers to serve in the Army to have a sense of historical perspective, rather than just serve in a vacuum. I would think knowing one’s branch recent history would inspire and motivate. Then again, maybe not. But that’s just me.
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 45
You won't find Marines that don't know who Smedley Butler, Dan Daly, and Chesty Puller are. And I'd be willing to bet that they have studied Desert Storm and most all would know who General Norman Schwarzkopf is. Colin Powell was Chairman of the JCS, and I'm sure some might know him, but I'm less confident that today's troops would know who he is.
The Corps has always stressed studying history and that is one of the cultural differences between the Army and Marines. The Marines are very into history... especially Marine Corps history! I'm not trying to poke the Army in the eye; just stating a fact. PME (Professional Military Education) is a requirement for ALL RANKS of Marines. And 18 years ago when I left, there was a gap in Army leadership -- not as much with the Officers, but especially at the SNCO and NCO level. The Marines at the NCO level were definitely more schooled in history, warfighting, and leadership. Again, this was 18 years ago and the Army may have since emulated that PME aspect of leadership training and closed the gap.
As an aside, I'm not sure if the Marines have continued to progress or if they have started to regress... What I heard recently has me questioning what's going on in today's Marine Corps as far as discipline and conduct. Again, I'm not trying to poke anyone in the eye, but things seem to be slacker than when I was in. In two years, the guys coming in when I retired will be eligible to retire, so virtually an entire generation of Marines has grown up in the Corps since I left and things may have changed. Personally, I feel like Obama's use of the military as a social experiment may be the root cause of the lack of discipline.
My cousin is with the Myrtle Beach Police Dept and [being equally honest] he related an observation to me... He said, "We get groups of military guys down at the beach all the time and I can look at them and the way they stand and carry themselves and I can immediately tell if they're Army or Marines." He added, "If there's trouble and we ask the Army guys to leave, they tend to listen pretty well and they just get out of there. The Marines are generally younger and they don't listen to anybody; they just get loud, obnoxious, and stupid when they're drinking. When they're causing trouble and we ask them to leave, they tend to stick around and give us a hard time... and they end up getting arrested!" <@@>
I don't remember being like that when I was a troop, but we did have our share of belligerents. That said, if you were in a group out in town and one guy started acting stupidly, the others would intervene and give him the what for. They would try to keep him out of trouble so they wouldn't get in trouble! I'm not sure if we've gotten worse in this area with Millenials simply being more self-absorbed instead of being team players and not getting the whole look out for your buddy thing... or if things haven't changed at all? It could just be my faulty memory...
LTC Stephen F.
The Corps has always stressed studying history and that is one of the cultural differences between the Army and Marines. The Marines are very into history... especially Marine Corps history! I'm not trying to poke the Army in the eye; just stating a fact. PME (Professional Military Education) is a requirement for ALL RANKS of Marines. And 18 years ago when I left, there was a gap in Army leadership -- not as much with the Officers, but especially at the SNCO and NCO level. The Marines at the NCO level were definitely more schooled in history, warfighting, and leadership. Again, this was 18 years ago and the Army may have since emulated that PME aspect of leadership training and closed the gap.
As an aside, I'm not sure if the Marines have continued to progress or if they have started to regress... What I heard recently has me questioning what's going on in today's Marine Corps as far as discipline and conduct. Again, I'm not trying to poke anyone in the eye, but things seem to be slacker than when I was in. In two years, the guys coming in when I retired will be eligible to retire, so virtually an entire generation of Marines has grown up in the Corps since I left and things may have changed. Personally, I feel like Obama's use of the military as a social experiment may be the root cause of the lack of discipline.
My cousin is with the Myrtle Beach Police Dept and [being equally honest] he related an observation to me... He said, "We get groups of military guys down at the beach all the time and I can look at them and the way they stand and carry themselves and I can immediately tell if they're Army or Marines." He added, "If there's trouble and we ask the Army guys to leave, they tend to listen pretty well and they just get out of there. The Marines are generally younger and they don't listen to anybody; they just get loud, obnoxious, and stupid when they're drinking. When they're causing trouble and we ask them to leave, they tend to stick around and give us a hard time... and they end up getting arrested!" <@@>
I don't remember being like that when I was a troop, but we did have our share of belligerents. That said, if you were in a group out in town and one guy started acting stupidly, the others would intervene and give him the what for. They would try to keep him out of trouble so they wouldn't get in trouble! I'm not sure if we've gotten worse in this area with Millenials simply being more self-absorbed instead of being team players and not getting the whole look out for your buddy thing... or if things haven't changed at all? It could just be my faulty memory...
LTC Stephen F.
(7)
(0)
I was at Camp Humphries a few years back, supervising the TOC night shift, and began talking to the OIC, a Major who had been prior service about our respective active duty days. The topic of Desert Storm came up, and a new soldier on the shift began listening in. We talked about the invasion of Kuwait, General Schwarzkopf and the other players. When we finished, the Private looked at me with a puzzled look and said “Sergeant, so that really happened?” My jaw just dropped.
(7)
(0)
I'm around high school athletes a lot. Majority know nothing about the national anthem.
(6)
(0)
Funny how both Colin Powell and Norman Schwarzkopf,Jr made their bones in little ole Vietnam bet that would blow their minds,Geez I forgot that’s Ancient History and that’s definitely not taught anymore,not to the politicians of that time anyway
(6)
(0)
to young, and we have transitioned from a school system that teaches real meaningful history, to one where all the evil Europeans came and destroyed everything and we should be ashamed.
(6)
(0)
It isn't just the schools. It is the Army too. You all do not teach enough history, customs and courtesies in boot camp or on an ongoing basis. Every Marine knows Chesty, Dan Daily, Alfred Cunningham, Archibald Henderson and a host of other historical figures. They know about Chapultepec, the Banana Wars, Belleau Wood, Guadalcanal, Iwo, Hue, Khe Sanh and a bunch of other places. The public schools do not and have not taught that level of detail even when I went to school. If you want them to know it, you have to create courses for it and teach it. I am sure the training schedule is packed with a host of less important things than knowing your legacy.
(5)
(0)
I watched GEN Powell mow his lawn in a regulation white t shirt, shorts, knee high black socks and penny loafers. I was dating a woman in Virginia that lived next door to him... AS for why young people don't know... because the schools gloss over vast swaths of history in order to teach to the tests.
(5)
(0)
Nicci Eisenhauer
Thank you for the Colin Powell memory! What a vision of a great man just being human. :-) I always wished he'd have made a run for President. I feel like we missed out on that. I wish GEN Dempsey would run. I keep pokin' at him on LinkedIn. They got my Uncle Ike to run by having a huge rally in NYC without him knowing, filming it and showing it to him in Paris where he and Mamie were at the time. It made him teary and he finally gave in to accepting a nomination for a job he didn't want. Amazing. Maybe we should throw Marty a rally?
(1)
(0)
LT Brad McInnis
Nicci Eisenhauer - That's an awesome story about your Uncle! My belief is that some of the best political leaders are those that don't want to be political leaders. But, what do I know, I got laughed at when I defended a paper I wrote at the Naval Academy in my political science major, where I argued that politics isn't a straight line with left and right, rather it is a circle. Have a great week!
(0)
(0)
I've answered several questions on RP from guys wanting to know the difference between the Army and the Marines. Having served in both branches, I gladly offer my opinion. While there are pros and cons to each, the Marine Corps far outdoes the Army in this area. When I went to boot camp, Marine Corps history was the focus for about the first 4 weeks. Dan Daly, Smedley Butler, Archibald Henderson, Pappy Boyington, Opha Mae Johnson, Chest Puller, etc. etc. This list goes on. Part of the esprit de corps in the Marines comes from the history that's instilled in boot camp. The Army (and other branches) would do well to follow suit.
(4)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
MAJ (Join to see) I think you are right in your assessment. I think it might be the historical difference between the Marines and Army. The Marines are a relatively smaller elite force and the history would be easier to teach. When I went to Basic in 1980, we had a good amount of history on major units and wars. Once we got to our line units, the real history of our individual units was taught in great detail. I still remember the history of the 11th Infantry Regiment 5th ID, 19th Infantry Regiment 24th ID, and the 87th Infantry Regiment 8th ID and 10th ID. Of course we learned the history of the Rangers, Special Forces, and Airborne units. We had hundreds of Infantry, Armor, and Artillery divisions in WWII alone. It would be a helluva lot to learn.
(2)
(0)
Nicci Eisenhauer
My Dad knew his Marine Corps history and our family's one millennial Marine seems pretty sharp on it, too.
(1)
(0)
CH (MAJ) William Beaver - Because most officers don’t bother teaching army history to their subordinates. That being said, the army as a whole does a very poor job, of passing on our history. In my experience, the Navy and Marine Corps do much better job.
(4)
(0)
MSG (Join to see)
PO2 David Dunlap It is my understanding that most Army Active duty commissions come from Militay cadet programs. Sush as West Point and the Citadel.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next


American History
Persian/Arabian Gulf
Operation Desert Shield/Storm
Military Education
