Posted on May 5, 2015
CPT(P) Air Defense Artillery Officer
21K
166
55
0
0
0
A4 sharpposter
So we are all very aware of SHARP, hence the 300 hours or more of training a year. However, What do you personally feel should be the Army's number one priority at this present time?

Take the survey below: If the response you wish to select is not there, then by all means place it in a comment. I am really interested as to what the masses think about this subject.
Posted in these groups: B4caadf8 SuicideImages 4 Fair PayMain benefits 1335181026 Benefits
Avatar feed
See Results
Responses: 34
Votes
  • Newest
  • Oldest
  • Votes
SSG Recruiter
2
2
0
Its very depressing to see our pay and benefits shrink and become more stringent every year. Have the demands of training or threats to our nation diminished at all? I didn't think so. when seasoned service members bring this point up the answer is always the same . " well you can always just get out sarnt" How can you say that to peoplethe majority of whom answered our nation's call when the war on terror first kicked Off. Sexual Assault, Equal Opportunity and Suicide are all critical focus points. None more important than the other. However we should really start looking at these issues from the top down. Every SHARP class I've sat through generally has lower enlisted and some Junior NCO's in the videos. ... I don't know about you guys but I did see that documentary " the silent war" sure were a lot of upper echelon individuals being indicated. Im sure I'm just supposed to ignore that. Why is it that the class six is always stocked and open nearly every day? you can find a greater variety of alcohol than any other item sold on any base exchange. That means you a greater selection of beer than soap.... kinda sends the wrong signal doesn't it. I mean we do know thar 90% of sexual assaults involve booze. We also know that there aren't enough medical resources available to support members who need it which contributes to depression which leads to suicides. .. in regards to EO I honestly think we might be a little too vigilant in some areas been a long time since I've seen a minority as SMA though just saying
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
WO1 Intelligence Officer (S2)
2
2
0
Suicide, SHARP, and EO are all things that are hurting us. Most units have been affected by all or most of them. Even if it's just a Soldier in the unit who knows someone who was affected. They give the Army, and the Military a big black eye.

I would love to spend more time on my benefits. I would love to know more about the draw down, and how it affects my unit, and me. But until the PR nightmare that the other problems create is dealt with I don't see it changing.
(2)
Comment
(0)
CPT Quartermaster Officer
CPT (Join to see)
10 y
SGT Sterling,

I agree about suicide, SHARP, and EO.

Now into the 5th month of awaiting promotion board results for the FY15 RC CPT APL board that was held in December, apparently they are now doing an 'enhanced screening process' whereby they are specifically targeting considered officers who have EO/SHARP issues.

One would think violations would stick out like a sore thumb on an OER, however, with generally 1-3 minutes dedicated to each packet, it would seem that this came about simply because some of those issues slipped through the cracks in the past--resulting in officers, at least, promoting that shouldn't have promoted.

While some might say that certain personnel-related processes (promotion/separation/etc) could stand to benefit from a little bit more transparency and communication (at least in relation to the drawdown and transition to a peacetime force), it is at least refreshing to see them taking the time to proactively see that those EO/SHARP violators are weeded out in the early stages of their respective careers.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
COL Charles Williams
2
2
0
I can't/shouldn't vote for two reasons. 1st, I am retired, so my opinion is now dated and irrelevant. 2nd, Sexual Assaults are huge problem, that I dealt with as a MP, a Company and Battalion Commander, and finally for 37 months as a Garrison Commander as we rolled all these changes out. But, it is not the only problem. I think we need to also focus on the suicide issue as well. The other three pale in comparison.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG John Bacon
2
2
0
The army needs a better way of screening potential Soldiers and transitioning Members for Suicide prevention. We loose so many of our brothers and sisters to it every day.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGM Matthew Quick
1
1
0
NO...SHARP should never HAVE to be the #1 priority for the Army EVER! Military PROFESSIONALS should be just that...PROFESSIONALS!
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Operations Officer (S3)
1
1
0
I would prefer we focus on personnel and equipment readiness. That is what wins wars. All other initiatives should fall secondary to that. The last time I checked our rate of sexual harassment and assault is lower than that of the general populace. While I agree we need to continue to work on eliminating SHARP issues within our ranks, if we have a problem our society has an even bigger problem.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Healthcare Specialist (Combat Medic)
1
1
0
As we all know, sexual harassment is an issue in the Army. I have been in a units that seems as if we are doing SHARP traing every week for 6 hours, and is because someone on post was sexually harassed. As this is becoming an issue, I beleive that our standards as an Army as a whole is going down, specifically discipline. We are letting the wrong people in and kicking the right Soldiers out / or letting the right ones go to fast andeasy. this is not good for business. I have seen so many of my good buddies leave because the Army is not enforcing standards, discipline, regulation, values. They would rather become or risk becoming homeless on the outside than deal with the BS. Me, I stayed in hoping I can make a difference. The army wants to move more towards the way a fortune 500 company runs, sounds nice, maybe a few ideas can be brought over but the fact is, because of the militaries business (War) and other stuff, we can not run like those companies. I remember when i screwed up, i got my ass chewed off and the smoked the hell out of. im not saying bring that back peersay, but not everything needs to be put on paper. But discipline is not being taught and instilled in a Soldier in Basic or AIT anymore. Basic use to beworse thethan the unit, we looked forward to it. Now the Soldier comes to the company with a rude awakening because they are expecting the NCO to bow down to them and tend to their every need like the drill sergeants did (or whatever they are called now). Bringing back discipline wont solve all the problems in the Army, but I beleive it willbbe a big start.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
2LT (Pre-Commission)
1
1
0
Edited 10 y ago
ROTC isn't exception to the dreaded SHARP training, but... I would say that no government program will ever stop sexual harassment/assault... not just in the military, but just about anywhere. It is the same thing as telling an idiot to stop stealing. You can't fix stupidity.

Yes, sexual assaults in the military seriously undermine the Army readiness and its Army values, but... It is ultimately up to each and every one of us to actively step in/intervene when there is a risky situation. That seems to be the only solution. Elimination of all sexual assaults would be ideal, but in reality, there will be bad apples in every apple tree.

A lot of times folks from Cadet Command come down to ROTC battalions and conduct post-SHARP training climate survey and the questions they ask is just so pointless... such a huge waste of our time to just stand around so early in the morning just so that these people can ask some stupid/vague/general questions that won't even help prevent any sexual assaults.

Honestly speaking, SHARP should be common sense. Sometimes it's hard for me to understand why things have gotten so bad to the point that government would have to create pointless programs that bombard the employees/members of the armed forces with hours of sexual assault prevention education programs. And especially in the military. It's just hard to believe so many people call themselves the members of the armed forces and do stupid things that is contrary to the values that the military upholds.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Squad Leader
1
1
0
What about the soldiers that have encounter injuries due to service that have been misdiagnosed, due to medical personal not taking the proper time with the service member. I hear it from veterans all the time, why didn't they catch this or that!
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Infantryman (Airborne)
1
1
0
I've seen what sexual harassment can do to a female solider/Vet. At the VA, a lot of the trauma patients have had sexual harassment or assaulted, or both. Besides the PTSD, now they have to face their other demons. I've helped a few out by gaining their trust in men and not feeling ashamed of something that wasn't their fault. It didn't happen overnight. It took months of coaching and friendliness towards them. Ive always looked at it like what if she was my daughter or wife. I really think SHARP is what all the military should concentrate on.
(1)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Byron Oyler
MAJ Byron Oyler
10 y
Stop making my daughter a victim before she graduates kindergarten because that is what we are doing across the board.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Company Commander
1
1
0
Winning in Afghanistan.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Stephen King
1
1
0
SHARP is important. Suicide to me is more important understanding it not training. The fact that we are all part of a team regardless of branch. The stigma of seeking help is still out there. We need to prevent suicides, for the military and for civilians, this means expanding access to care and making sure that people feel comfortable seeking it.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CSM Carlson C.
0
0
0
This is the thing. It can't be as cut and dry as you are framing the question. You can be the most cutting edge military and top notch training, but if there is constant sexual harassment and unfair treatment the foundation of the complete organization has been severely damaged. There must be a good balance to these problems faced by the military. Also a more proactive approach vs the reactionary measures must be taken. Instead of force feeding hundreds of hours lead by example and hold people to a standard and take sexual harassment and assault seriously
(0)
Comment
(0)
CPT(P) Air Defense Artillery Officer
CPT(P) (Join to see)
10 y
MSG,

The question is not to alienate sexual harassment or its existence in the military. The question leans toward which issues require more emphasis and attention by top leaders, if they are more than that of sexual harassment. Said leaders, have voiced their agendas, clearly stating that sexual harassment is the #1 priority. Therefore, is this issue the one we should be lazer focused on ?
(0)
Reply
(0)
CSM Carlson C.
CSM Carlson C.
10 y
I think that you have to attend to the items equally... Just my opinion, because if you focus on one without the other then you flounder on the focus needed to alleviate the problems that are current in our Army, hell, our military. The number 1 mission should always be accomplishment of the mission and welfare of Soldiers. Then spread resources as needed. There is no right answer. Its the answer at that time.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CSM Christopher St. Cyr
0
0
0
Training to fight our nation's enemy while learning to respect the differences of those we serve with by observing their abilities during tough training.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Charles Hunter
0
0
0
The Army's (and all military services) number one priority should be now and always combat readiness. Any activity or program that detracts from that goal is wasteful and counterproductive.

I have read that veterans (including serving service members) commit suicide at the rate of 22 per day. This issue certainly needs attention from all levels of leadership. Junior service members must be able to report aberrant behavior without fear of repercussions.

Pay and benefits are certainly important, and necessary to attract and retain the all volunteer force. People must be well compensated to put themselves in harms way.

Sexual harassment and sexual assault have long been a problem. Effective discipline toward offenders is imperative. One of the greatest problems is the credibility of allegations, particularly when alcohol is involved.

Equal opportunity programs are hardly a new thing. One would have expected some improvement over the last 40 years. Human nature will always be human nature.

The draw-down is, as usual, a political issue and very short-sighted. The military must ensure that a rapid response to external threats is possible. We've been caught flat-footed too often before: 1941, 1950, 2011.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Evac Plt Medic
0
0
0
No, I don't agree that SHARP should be our focal point. Maybe how to mitigate needless spending in the Army should take it's place.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Explosive Ordnance Disposal Specialist
0
0
0
None of those should ever be the top priority of ANY military organization. It should be conducting or training to conduct war time missions. I shouldn't have to cancel mission essential training and counseling so that we can sit through another lecture because some service member did wrong. It's no wonder we are becoming a weaker force.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CH (MAJ) Chaplain
0
0
0
Constantly reiterating the military's position on sexual abuse is an effective way to remind potential predators of the consequences. Just reminding people that this kind of action will not be ignored averts many from making a bad choice. If all of this SHARP training we all have to endure prevents even one rape it makes it all worth it. If we were aware of an imminent assault we would do whatever we can to stop it from happening. I do not know what should be the number one priority but I do appreciate the importance SHARP as annoying as it may be. The victim is our comrade
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Platoon Sergeant
0
0
0
How about training...
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC(P) Diagnostic Radiologist
0
0
0
SHARP training and suicide prevention are a complete waste of time and prove the army is bending to political correctness and box checking. Has SHARP training and suicide prevention decreased harassment or suicides, no.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Forensic Meteorological Consultant
0
0
0
SHARP = B.S.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Quartermaster Officer
0
0
0
I picked 'pay & benefits' because I feel that, with such a rapid draw down, that certain processes may inherently be screwing over Soldiers. Separating Soldiers is already an unpleasant task; I believe we should at least treat Soldiers with at least some dignity and respect during that process.

I was fortunate to be involved with the logistics surrounding the draw down of Iraq.

The intent was for this draw down to be a "responsible draw down", as it related to moving equipment/supplies out of Iraq.

...I strongly believe that the draw down of PERSONNEL also needs to be a "responsible draw down".

There will be difference of opinions here, but, one case I came across recently revolved around an AF officer who, via 2 x Non-select for promotion, was forced to involuntarily separate from the service.

Before being involuntarily separated, he had agreed to serve an additional 4 years in order to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his spouse. With every intent for him to serve 20 years, his wife proceeded to start utilizing the benefits--she actually used upwards of $24,000+ dollars before he was non-select the 2nd time, and forced to involuntarily separate.

Likewise, because he was unable to serve those 4 years--even though it was due to his involuntary separation--it was decided that he would have to pay back that $24,000, as an "overpayment" in benefits.

(Now, one could argue that he 'should have seen it coming', but with selection rates dropping, I would argue that even great Soldiers--with no derogatory information/bad evaluations--are being separated, as well....making it increasingly difficult to actually predict whether one will be selected or not. As far as I understand that particular case, that officer had no derogatory information in his file.)

I can't say whether some things are being done, deliberately by design to incur a cost savings....but, I do think we need to be very careful. Soldiers just bore the burden of war for a decade+....I think we at least owe it to them to give treat them with dignity and respect during the separation process.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1LT Company First Sergeant
0
0
0
It is important but there are other issues as well that shouldn't be supplanted by this.

Also in response to the sexual harassment/assault problem the army has gone back through recruiters, drill sergeants, sharp reps, victim advocates records and flagged many with type 1 and type 2 violations. Some of these violations existed prior to said soldier becoming recruiters, drill sergeants, etc and were waivered and or acknowledged that some issues existed.

Essentially resulting in soldiers that were allowed to pursue and serve honorably in these positions are now being told that they can't be trusted in those positions.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Information Technology Specialist
0
0
0
If we are to follow our leaders intent then yes. Background: in October 2014, SECARMY published his priorities listing. Sexual assault was at the top of that list.
(0)
Comment
(0)
PFC Alex Rivers
PFC Alex Rivers
10 y
It shouldn't be sergeant. There should be no need to hold a soldiers' hand and tell them that sexual harassment is not okay. It's a common sense thing, if you don't have the integrity to keep your hands to yourself, you really shouldn't be wearing the uniform.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

How are you connected to the military?
  • Active Duty
  • Active Reserve / National Guard
  • Pre-Commission
  • Veteran / Retired
  • Civilian Supporter