What is your opinion on the new restricted immigration policies?

Enforcing the laws of the land. What is the problem?
The doors are not shut to legal immigration, just illegal.
What is the problem with vetting those that want to come here?

It's nothing new the previous 3 Presidents had done similar things on immigration. President Trump is just trying to vet possible threats to our country. I think some people are just being vocal because who is saying this information. I think it's just common sense to screen people who are coming into our country especially from countries that don't like the USA.

it's about time ... but BHO Was One of them and would allow any into the country who was willing to Help destroy it...

Contrary to all the hysteria, this is a 90 day pause to re-assess our vetting processes for receiving people from countries that have some combination of no functioning government / lawlessness, strong reasons to question the authenticity of travel documents, heavy presence of Islamic Extremists, come from state sponsors of Terrorism, or come from countries that continually remind us they are going to conquer the West. Long overdue.  

COL John Hudson - The proposed (now stayed by federal court action) immigration ban was moronic, delusional, poorly considered, poorly written, and poorly implemented - and took no account of the extremely severe adverse impact on individuals, families, our national interests, and international reputation. Some people should be castrated or neutered, slowly dissected without anesthesia, and put to death for misleading our grand, glorious, devoted, and fearless leader into signing such an unreasonable exec order. These are my feelings - not a specific or concerted plan of any kind for taking action against anyone - merely emphasizing I am deeply and intrinsically opposed to surrendering our country to the tyranny of either the masses or a few advisors who feel committed to wrecking our foreign policy. Warmest Regards, Sandy :)

Cpl Joshua Caldwell SGT (Join to see) LTC (Join to see)

I have no issues with a short term suspension of entrance requirements until we can get a handle on things. I don't agree with blocking those with valid visas, approved refuge status and so on as they have already been through the process. I think this is a case of good intent bad execution.

LONG OVER DUE LEADERSHIP

20 January 2017 reminded me of one of those days that only rarely happen in one’s lifetime.
President Donald J. Trump became the 45th President of the United States, and he is not waffling on his commitment to the citizens of the United States of America.

After only ten days in office, President Trump in my option has taken more positive reactions to combat the foreigners, foreign countries, and even our citizens than anyone since 911. America has changed since 911, and we let leadership convince us that they knew more than we about the changing demographics of America such as our borders being the busiest migration of humans whom we have no idea who they are. The “Rule of Law” does not apply to most of the people entering our country if somethings said about Vetting foreigners you're labeled as profiling or even a Racist or both.

People have to face the fact that other countries in most cases do not value life the way we do in America. I do not understand if Muslims believe in ideas that we have all seen them demonstrate. Such as stoning a person to death, cutting off their heads, hanging people or just plain killing each other at will, why we would not want to ensure that if a person comes into our country, they are not of these beliefs.

I have been to Ellis Island and stood were the people from all walks of life from around the world had traveled in conditions most of us wouldn't be able to do stand in lines waiting to become Americans.

To have stood there visualizing what these people went through is mind boggling, to say the least.
Is our government just supposed to let the non-United States citizens come into our country unvetted?

Senator McCain has nothing good to say about anyone you would think after twenty-eight years in national government would be first in line to make sure our country stays as safe as we can. Instead, he blasts President Trump just like he does everyone else if he does not get his way. Stop and think about it after 28 years and a failed run for President of the United States he would get the hint. Things happen very quickly in the world he is worth over ten million dollars, now ask yourself if you think he has our best interest at heart, I say “HELL NO.” !!

To date, President Trump has proved he is working to make America Great again just think if the powers to be in Washington D.C. would get behind President Trump and help him achieve that goal it would not take long to be a Great Country again. I wish we could charge the media with hate crimes they have lost all creditability in my opinion. We finally have a leader with a set of Balls, and it seems as if
President Trumps treated like trash.

Just think if these spineless weasels treated Obama like they treat President Trump we would be in the biggest race war in history.

This has been done by other administrations dating back at least 45 years and then some. But confining the conversation to recent events, yes, it is a good idea. First of all, Trump is carrying through on a campaign promise but more importantly is the fact that every sovereign nation has the obligation to protect its citizens. It also has the legal right to restrict, modify, cancel, revoke and refuse to issue a visa, transit document or travel documents at will and without cause or explanation. These same obligations and rights apply to all other countries of the world.

The world is not utopia. It is a dangerous place and becoming more dangerous all the time. The government is obliged to do everything to assure that anyone desiring to enter the US has been properly vetted INCLUDING holders of green cards if deemed necessary.

Contrary to the opinions of many this suspension is not discriminatory. It is common sense. It is prudent to periodically review procedures to effectiveness. A nation has the obligation to assure its citizens are being afforded all possible protections from an entity wishing to do us harm.

When you are in a hole what is the first thing you do...stop digging and try to figure a way out of it. That is what I see Pres Trump is doing. Stopping the digging and trying to figure a better way or a way out That is what I see with our immigration issues today. We have opened our doors so wide that anyone and everyone can come in unvetted. I have a serious problem with that. I have no problem with properly vetted folks coming in wanting a better life for themselves or for their families...that is what America is all about...heck we are all from immigrants of some kind unless you are native American. Just need to do it smartly.

On a very small scale, most people don't simply open the doors to their homes and allow people to come in unless they know the individuals, know they can be trusted, or have "reliable" information that the individual (s) can be trusted. To do so would be accepting unnecessary risk that an unknown person might harm you or your family. And while the implementation of the current temporary immigration ban on select countries was a bit heavy-handed, I personally support the intent, considering the previous administration was dependent on a poor or nearly non existent vetting system. Claiming to have vetted a refugee from a country where records are sketchy at best, and non existent in most cases, does not constitute "proper" vetting. Bottom line, a temporary ban on immigration until proper vetting procedures, can be put in place is appropriate and prudent. I don't care about "nice," I care about safety of my family and the country!!