Avatar feed
Responses: 12
SSG Robert Webster
7
7
0
No matter what you think of President Wilson, it appears that he was much wiser than many make him out to be.

President Woodrow Wilson's July 4, 1913 Gettysburg reunion address summarized the spirit: "We have found one another again as brothers and comrades in arms, enemies no longer, generous friends rather, our battles long past, the quarrel forgotten—except that we shall not forget the splendid valor."

Far too many of our fellow citizens have lost this important insight.
(7)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Special Forces Officer
MAJ (Join to see)
>1 y
WW was a Princeton elite professor, he was the first "progressive", he lost it on freedom, capitalism, and local control of education.
(1)
Reply
(0)
PO3 Carl Denbow
PO3 Carl Denbow
7 y
He also was a bigot of the first water. He systematically removed blacks from the Civil Service, and thought that the racist movie, "Birth of a Nation," was accurate history. He slowly, and deservedly, is gradually sinking to the bottom level of American presidents as evaluated by historians. His slide has been slower than the facts would warrant, mainly because he is a Ph.D. and an academic, and the academy is slow to turn on "one of its own."
(3)
Reply
(0)
LTC Stephen F.
LTC Stephen F.
>1 y
FYI PO3 Carl Denbow I concur with your assessment of former President Woodrow Wilson who also put all his political weight into the League of Nations which the USA Congress rejected.
Junior Delaware Senator Joe Biden signed Senate Joint Resolution 23 restoring US citizenship to General Robert E. Lee on April 10, 1975
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Stephen F.
6
6
0
D3d45ea5
Thank you my friend SSG Robert Webster for reminding us that on August 5, 1975 former President Gerald R Ford signed the Senate Joint Resolution 23 restored "full rights of citizenship to General Robert E. Lee" in a ceremony at Lee's former family property which is Arlington National Cemetery

Image: Junior Delaware Senator Joe Biden signed Senate Joint Resolution 23 restoring US citizenship to General Robert E. Lee on April 10, 1975

1. Background from {[https://www.mediaite.com/election-2020/heres-why-joe-biden-voted-to-restore-robert-e-lees-citizenship-in-1975/]}
By the way, Junior Delaware Senator Joe Biden Voted to Restore Robert E. Lee’s Citizenship in 1975....
The resolution, Senate Joint Resolution 23, was introduced in the Senate on January 30, 1975 by Sen. Harold Byrd (D-VA). ...
The resolution passed the Senate by unanimous consent on April 10, 1975, and passed the House by a vote of 407-10 on July 22, 1975.
The bill was signed on August 5, 1975 by Republican President Gerald Ford.'

2. President Gerald R. Ford's Remarks Upon Signing a Bill Restoring Rights of Citizenship to General Robert E. Lee source {[https://www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov/library/speeches/750473.htm]}
August 5, 1975
Governor Godwin, Senator Byrd, Congressman Butler, Congressman Harris, Congressman Satterfield, Congressman Downing, and Congressman Daniel, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen:
I am very pleased to sign Senate Joint Resolution 23, restoring posthumously the long overdue, full rights of citizenship to General Robert E. Lee. This legislation corrects a 110-year oversight of American history. It is significant that it is signed at this place.
Lee's dedication to his native State of Virginia chartered his course for the bitter Civil War years, causing him to reluctantly resign from a distinguished career in the United States Army and to serve as General of the Army of Northern Virginia. He, thus, forfeited his rights to U.S. citizenship.
Once the war was over, he firmly felt the wounds of the North and South must be bound up. He sought to show by example that the citizens of the South must dedicate their efforts to rebuilding that region of the country as a strong and vital part of the American Union.
In 1865, Robert E. Lee wrote to a former Confederate soldier concerning his signing the Oath of Allegiance, and I quote: "This war, being at an end, the Southern States having laid down their arms, and the questions at issue between them and the Northern States having been decided, I believe it to be the duty of everyone to unite in the restoration of the country and the reestablishment of peace and harmony."
This resolution passed by the Congress responds to the formal application of General Lee to President Andrew Johnson on June 13, 1865, for the restoration of his full rights of citizenship. Although this petition was endorsed by General Grant and forwarded to the President through the Secretary of War, an Oath of Allegiance was not attached because notice of this additional requirement had not reached Lee in time.
Later, after his inauguration as President of Washington College on October 2, 1865, Lee executed a notarized Oath of Allegiance. Again his application was not acted upon because the Oath of Allegiance was apparently lost. It was finally discovered in the National Archives in 1970.
As a soldier, General Lee left his mark on military strategy. As a man, he stood as the symbol of valor and of duty. As an educator, he appealed to reason and learning to achieve understanding and to build a stronger nation. The course he chose after the war became a symbol to all those who had marched with him in the bitter years towards Appomattox.
General Lee's character has been an example to succeeding generations, making the restoration of his citizenship an event in which every American can take pride.
In approving this Joint Resolution, the Congress removed the legal obstacle to citizenship which resulted from General Lee's Civil War service. Although more than a century late, I am delighted to sign this resolution and to complete the full restoration of General Lee's citizenship."

NOTE: The President spoke at 2:12 p.m. at Arlington House, Arlington, Va. Arlington House, formerly known as the Custis-Lee Mansion, was the home of General Lee. As enacted, S.J. Res. 23 is Public Law 94-67 (89 Stat. 380).

FYI LTC Marc King COL Mikel J. Burroughs SFC (Join to see) Lt Col Charlie Brown SMSgt Lawrence McCarter TSgt David L. CPL Dave Hoover SGT Steve McFarland SSG William Jones PO2 (Join to see) 1SG (Join to see) 1SG Steven Imerman SFC William Farrell SFC Richard Williamson CPT Jack Durish SP5 Mark Kuzinski SSG Franklin Briant SSG Samuel Kermon GySgt Gary Cordeiro
(6)
Comment
(0)
PO2 Builder
PO2 (Join to see)
>1 y
Interesting post Sir. Thanks.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
4
4
0
The same man pardoned Nixon , so it was just par for the course pardoning criminals will always be part of his legacy.

It is strange how people are furious about Manning but want monuments for far worse traitors to be protected
(4)
Comment
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
>1 y
One writer from a very far right site.
(2)
Reply
(0)
1SG First Sergeant
1SG (Join to see)
>1 y
SSG Robert Webster - Its seems the US government disagrees with that sentiment. Personally, I think the author oversimplified the case, which is dangerous with SCOTUS rulings. Those are, by nature, quite expansive.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Gerhard S.
SSG Gerhard S.
>1 y
The court is not without great flaws. Whenever the court rules politically, or with partisanship, instead of through the lens of the Constitution we find flawed decisions. Look at Dred Scott v. Sanford, Buck v. Bell, Korematsu v. United States, Plessy v. Ferguson, et.al.

Is it really that surprising that a Supreme court made up of northern Judges in 1869 would rule against secession? This is more a matter of ruling politically, than ruling with the Constitution as the measure of law.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Gerhard S.
SSG Gerhard S.
>1 y
1stSgt Nelson Kerr - I have down voted your comment regarding your assertion that I quoted a "Nazi" website to make my argument, and also for your insinuation "that tells me (you) everything I need to know about you (me)."

You received the down vote (something I've only done a few times) because you engaged in a personal attack. Also because I gave you the opportunity to prove your point by demonstrating that I cited a "Nazi" website, and for implying that I ostensibly hold some sort sympathetic views to Nazism. For the Record, nothing could be farther from the truth, and your inability to produce any evidence regarding the website, is the reason behind my down vote.
I will always welcome honest debate, and differences of opinion. But making false accusations, or insinuations, particularly of this nature, is NOT debate: It's slander, and it's a coward's way out of a debate when one has run out of arguments.
Regards.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close