Avatar feed
Responses: 18
1SG Dennis Hicks
14
14
0
4f324c8c
By far, I think the revolutionary method of engaging your enemy in open fields standing shoulder to shoulder as you each send musket and cannon balls at each other was more insane. :)
(14)
Comment
(0)
Lt Col Charlie Brown
Lt Col Charlie Brown
>1 y
Target practice on a grand scale.
(7)
Reply
(0)
1SG Steven Imerman
1SG Steven Imerman
>1 y
In the pre 1840s days, straying from formation would get you overrun and lanced or sabered by the opposing cavalry. Formations kept you safe from them and muskets and cannon were so slow and short ranged they were the lesser threat. The modernization of muskets and artillery without the development of new tactics is what made the Civil War so bloody, and what spelled the end of cavalry as an equal partner on the battlefield. We forget that from 500 BC to about 1840, cavalry was arguably the king of battle. Look at the Mongols. European armies had infantry mainly because they couldn't afford more horses.
(7)
Reply
(0)
SGT Brad Baier
SGT Brad Baier
>1 y
Better off fighting a gorilla war tactic. I sure wouldn't have wanted to stand in a formation hopping that I was missed each time the enemy shot a volley.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW5 Jack Cardwell
11
11
0
Poor dogs !
(11)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close