Posted on Oct 30, 2023
Biden issues U.S.' first AI executive order, requiring safety assessments, civil rights guidance,...
285
18
12
6
6
0
My comment - "When the government website on this subject it encompasses the summary provided by the various news outlets. What it doesn't cover is flushing out the rules by non-elected bureaucrats. Remember the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act consisted of 848 pages in the original bill. It was assigned to unelected bureaucrats who created 243 rules, 67 studies, and 22 periodic reports from the financial industries. The 848 bill grew to over 4,000 pages.
Perhaps the administration wants to slow the US development of AI and leave China and India with a technological advantage. The bottom line is more expense to the taxpayer with less results in keeping ahead of the curve on technology. Is this in the best interest of the United States and "we the people?"
@Lt Col Charlie Lt Col Charlie Brown COL Randall C. CSM Charles Hayden CSM Mike Maynard MSG Roy Cheever SFC John D. Cpl Vic Burk SPC Douglas Bolton
Perhaps the administration wants to slow the US development of AI and leave China and India with a technological advantage. The bottom line is more expense to the taxpayer with less results in keeping ahead of the curve on technology. Is this in the best interest of the United States and "we the people?"
@Lt Col Charlie Lt Col Charlie Brown COL Randall C. CSM Charles Hayden CSM Mike Maynard MSG Roy Cheever SFC John D. Cpl Vic Burk SPC Douglas Bolton
Biden issues U.S.' first AI executive order, requiring safety assessments, civil rights guidance,...
Posted from cnbc.com
Technology
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Office of the President (POTUS)
Posted 6 mo ago
Responses: 4
3
3
0
I agree about how a proposed law can become overinflated, but with approximately 330+ million population and approximately 32.6 million businesses in the U.S, it is probably necessary to cover every type of business that needs to be addressed and how to go about that. We cannot have one law, one requirement, to fit in every case. The law must spell out who is to be covered, why, and how.
So, bottom line is, do we need the law and what is the impact with that law and without that law.
Example: Back in the '90's I had a horse boarding business. There were 3 state regulations, 2 county regulations, and 2 Federal regulations covering that. In 1998 I opened a small pawn shop, sporting goods, and equine equipment store. That had 17 state, 12 county, and 15 Federal regulations.
Our nation has grown to the point that nothing in the area of government can or should be simple.
So, bottom line is, do we need the law and what is the impact with that law and without that law.
Example: Back in the '90's I had a horse boarding business. There were 3 state regulations, 2 county regulations, and 2 Federal regulations covering that. In 1998 I opened a small pawn shop, sporting goods, and equine equipment store. That had 17 state, 12 county, and 15 Federal regulations.
Our nation has grown to the point that nothing in the area of government can or should be simple.
(3)
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
SFC Casey O'Mally - More sarcasm. I did not say anything about the President creating laws. If you read the article, it states this EO is to set guidelines and establish standards.
From the article:
Creating new safety and security standards for AI
Protecting consumer privacy, including by creating guidelines
Advancing equity and civil rights by providing guidance
Protecting consumers overall by directing DHHS to create a program to evaluate potentially harmful AI-related health-care practices
Supporting workers by producing a report
Promoting innovation and competition by expanding grants
Working with international partners to implement AI standards
Developing guidance for federal agencies’ use and procurement of AI
I don't see any attempt to write laws there.
From the article:
Creating new safety and security standards for AI
Protecting consumer privacy, including by creating guidelines
Advancing equity and civil rights by providing guidance
Protecting consumers overall by directing DHHS to create a program to evaluate potentially harmful AI-related health-care practices
Supporting workers by producing a report
Promoting innovation and competition by expanding grants
Working with international partners to implement AI standards
Developing guidance for federal agencies’ use and procurement of AI
I don't see any attempt to write laws there.
(1)
(0)
SFC Casey O'Mally
MSG Stan Hutchison
"requiring new safety assessments, equity and civil rights guidance and research on AI’s impact on the labor market."
A requirement. Not a recommendation. That is creating law. But don't take my word for it... two sentences later....
"Like all executive orders, it 'has the force of law,' according to a senior administration official..."
Certainly sounds like they are trying to write law to me. And even admitting it.
"requiring new safety assessments, equity and civil rights guidance and research on AI’s impact on the labor market."
A requirement. Not a recommendation. That is creating law. But don't take my word for it... two sentences later....
"Like all executive orders, it 'has the force of law,' according to a senior administration official..."
Certainly sounds like they are trying to write law to me. And even admitting it.
(1)
(0)
SPC Jeff Daley, PhD
MSG Stan Hutchison - Your correct in stating that this is an Executive Order. However it still has to be followed as if it is a law unless it is overturned by the Supreme Court or the EO is cancelled by the current, or next administration POTUS.
(0)
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
SPC Jeff Daley, PhD - Agreed.
Now, if you would like to morph this into a discussion about EOs, I would gladly join in.
Now, if you would like to morph this into a discussion about EOs, I would gladly join in.
(0)
(0)
2
2
0
Colossus: The Forbin Project (1970) - Official Trailer (HD)
CLICK TO SUBSCRIBE: http://bit.ly/1reuGJV Follow us on TWITTER: https://twitter.com/scream_factory Follow us on FACEBOOK: http://on.fb.me/1ojljJS The ultimat...
This may have some merit. But his whole administration is entertaining to the 1/2 of 1% weirdos and putting America last. This broke back administration ruins everything it touches.
https://youtu.be/kyOEwiQhzMI?si=PUCnFtw4SadUiXTU
President Biden still thinks that climate change is more important than the threat of World War 3.
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel LTC Eugene Chu
SMSgt Lawrence McCarter Lt Col Charlie Brown Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen CPT Jack Durish LTC Stephen F. CSM Charles Hayden 1SG Russell S. 1SG Patrick Burke SFC Dr. Jesus Garcia-Arce, Psy.D SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL SFC John D. LTC Trent Klug CDR Andrew McMenamin, PhD Col (Join to see) 1st Lt Padre Dave Poedel CPT (Join to see)
https://youtu.be/kyOEwiQhzMI?si=PUCnFtw4SadUiXTU
President Biden still thinks that climate change is more important than the threat of World War 3.
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel LTC Eugene Chu
SMSgt Lawrence McCarter Lt Col Charlie Brown Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen CPT Jack Durish LTC Stephen F. CSM Charles Hayden 1SG Russell S. 1SG Patrick Burke SFC Dr. Jesus Garcia-Arce, Psy.D SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL SFC John D. LTC Trent Klug CDR Andrew McMenamin, PhD Col (Join to see) 1st Lt Padre Dave Poedel CPT (Join to see)
(2)
(0)
LTC Trent Klug
Biden is really just a puppet. Having to include civil rights and equity? Really? What a DEI tool he is.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
Enough with the crappy equity line. God, dems are just so mechanical with the DEI crap. Equality over equity every day. It's what we were founded on.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google