Now the article is completely misleading on Biden's role. It states "despite not teching any classes". While this is technically true, it is purposely misleading.
"According to a report by the Philadelphia Inquirer, he “collected $371,159 in 2017 plus $540,484 in 2018 and early 2019 for a vaguely defined role that involved no regular classes and around a dozen public appearances on campus, mostly in big, ticketed events.”
Biden’s professorship did involve him delivering numerous talks and lectures. In 2017, soon after the position was announced, his spokesperson Kate Bedingfield told UPenn’s newspaper The Daily Pennsylvanian that he would not be teaching traditional classes.
Alongside his professorship title, he officially held joint appointments in the Annenberg School for Communication and the School of Arts and Sciences, with a secondary affiliation in the Wharton School."
Why do coleges give big pay to people to do some talks? The same reason they give big payouts for well known personalities to do graduation speeches. If rakes in the donations for the university. Biden was basically "on retainer" to give such speeches for them giving them the fundraising power that comes with it.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/biden-professor-university-pennsylvania/
Was Biden a ‘Full Professor’ at the University of Pennsylvania?
And how much was he paid for the gig?
"But it sounds to us like Biden’s professorship is really more of speaking residency. He’s been on campus so infrequently that it becomes news when he actually is there. The Daily Pennsylvanian even took to publishing a photo essay documenting each appearance: four times each in 2017 and 2018, and twice this year."
Source: The Daily Pennsylvanian.
He did give 47 speeches during that time period elsewhere but he was paid. Starting at a flat fee of not less than $100K per speech.
https://www.phillymag.com/news/2019/07/10/joe-biden-penn-salary/
Penn Paid Joe Biden $775,000 to Expand Its “Global Outreach” … and Give Some Speeches
The former VP’s financial disclosures reveal that his annual salary was nearly double that of the average Penn prof — and he didn’t even have to teach.
https://www.thoughtco.com/former-presidents-speaking-fees-3368127
Like I said, it isn't that Biden did nothing for that money. He gave some speeches so the university could rake in donations.
Just in case you don't understand the magnitude of the fundraising money coming in and how $900k is nothing to pay to increase it:
"On Friday, April 22, Penn State donors and administration convened in the Bryce Jordan Center to celebrate the university’s “A Greater Penn State For 21st Century Excellence” fundraising campaign.
The initiative, which has been active for more than six years, has raised $2,166,032,798 so far, Penn State said, and will continue running until June 30. The campaign originated through President Eric Barron’s efforts to further Penn State’s development."
https://onwardstate.com/2022/04/26/a-greater-penn-state-campaign-raises-2-17-billion-counting/
That's over $2 billion, billion with a b. As of last year, Penn State's endowment was $4.6 billion.
How Much Do Former Presidents Get Paid in Speaking Fees? Hint: A Lot
Find out much former U.S. presidents are paid to speak. Learn how much they earn a year on the speaking circuit. Find out who gets paid the most.
Professor Biden was decidedly NOT there, and he was a "professor." It's right in the faculty handbook "The handbook describes the "PRIMARY" [emphasis mine] activity of a practice professor as TEACHING [emphasis Mine], though they may also "supervise independent studies and internships, serve on committees and attend school faculty meetings." Note, it says "also" not "instead."
Did he supervise independent studies or internships on those handful of days where he was present. If he served on committees via teleconferencing, why not just say so? Same for faculty meetings.
Subterfuge: an artifice or expedient used to evade a rule, escape a consequence, hide something, etc. But you are you are slipping toward the ad hominem.
I'm not evading a rule. I'm not escaping a consequence. I'm not hiding anything. I don't care for President Biden or any other democrat's governance. I said it before and I'll say it again.
I'm not a President Trump guy either. I don't have a problem with what he did or tried to do in office. But his personality is "un-presidential." Presidents need to be consensus builders. President Trump is not. Both parties presented unacceptable candidates for the 2016 and 2020 election. I had to decide if I wanted to shoot myself in the foot or the hand.
I would like an accounting of what professor Biden did do earn his pay. A direct dumbed down version if need be. It's clear you're not the man to doit. You aren't actually directly addressing a single point I've made. If you won't even bother to refute them, why should I change my mind? I don't think your defense of President Biden holds up.
Washington Examiner - Bias and Credibility
RIGHT BIAS These media sources are moderate to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may