Posted on May 23, 2020
State orders are a con — federalizing the National Guard should be the go-to for most missions...
5.26K
43
10
13
13
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 10
So the pay and benefits should be given out to the guardsmen, I won't deny that. However I don't fully agree with his article. I've only served a short stint in the guard, about 6 months in high school prior to going active soon as I completed OSUT, but if he wanted to fully federalize guard activations wouldn't that in essense make them USAR?
Again, as a now reservist and seeing how the pay is in the reserve component I see his point on pay, and even more the benefits, which as his accurately stated, is a key retention tool. However, the difference in the NG and Reserves is that individual states may need to individually activate troops on short notice or collectively in a region or nationwide emergency. As such I think SAD orders while maybe in need of some restructuring, is still valid in its purpose.
Again, as a now reservist and seeing how the pay is in the reserve component I see his point on pay, and even more the benefits, which as his accurately stated, is a key retention tool. However, the difference in the NG and Reserves is that individual states may need to individually activate troops on short notice or collectively in a region or nationwide emergency. As such I think SAD orders while maybe in need of some restructuring, is still valid in its purpose.
(6)
(0)
SSG Stephen Rogerson SFC John Lich CWO3 (Join to see) 1SG (Join to see) SSG William Jones CWO3 Dave Alcantara Sgt (Join to see) CWO3 (Join to see) CWO3 Dave Alcantara Sgt (Join to see) CPT Paul Whitmer SSG Samuel Kermon SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL SGT Robert Pryor SP5 Jim Curry CPL Douglas Chrysler SFC Terry Wilcox
(2)
(0)
Read This Next