Avatar feed
Responses: 12
SFC Retired
6
6
0
And we have power hungry politicians chomping at the bit to try and stupid people who will go right along with it. Just as we have now with Covid lock downs, which are now being shown to have done exactly nothing.
(6)
Comment
(0)
SFC Senior Civil Engineer/Annuitant
SFC (Join to see)
2 y
The covis-19 lockdowns were a dress rehearsal for our current Progressive Marxist Democrats forcing people to live by what they say their climate standards will be. Buy this car. Don’t use air conditioning. No power boats for you. No more gas powered trucks. You will pay more for electricity. You cannot live here of there. You can’t travel there. Etc.
https://nationalinterest.org/feature/how-china-controls-its-citizens-29467
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Stephen F.
5
5
0
Thank you m friend SFC (Join to see) for posting the link.
COVID lockdowns have no accomplished much that was positive IMHO.
The idea of a climate lockdown seems ludicrous.


For those who can't access remotely, here is the text from the link
{[https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/592011-coming-soon-climate-lockdowns]}
The past two years have been a checklist for the worst impulses of government and public sentiment. COVID allowed for supposedly temporary measures to morph into two years of “emergency” restrictions. But what if COVID was only the opening act, and another proclaimed crisis is the main event? Implementing significant but partial restrictions, one by one, in the name of the common good can allow for encompassing government control that results in relatively little backlash. Fear over climate change could lead to long-term soft lockdowns, given the precedent of immense growth of government power and significant support for sweeping state actions.

This isn’t a right-wing fever dream. Calls for harsh government measures in the name of saving the environment are already in the parlance of influential organizations and figures. In November 2020, the Red Cross proclaimed that climate change is a bigger threat than COVID and should be confronted with “the same urgency.” Bill Gates recently demanded dramatic measures to prevent climate change, claiming it will be worse than the pandemic. Despite millions of people having died from COVID, former governor of the Bank of England Mark Carney last year predicted that climate deaths will dwarf those of the pandemic. Lockdowns, which significantly reduced carbon emissions during 2020, could be the solution. After all, the EU’s climate service gloated, the first COVID lockdown may have saved 800 lives.

What would climate lockdowns look like? Most likely, cities and states would begin a gradual and discrete ramp-up of restrictions. During the early days of the pandemic, millions of Americans worked from home; this could become the permanent norm if special carbon taxes are put in place. Such taxes could be imposed on companies, limiting driving or air miles, and extend to individual employees. Drive to work in a car? You get hit with the tax. Children could be impacted by climate lockdowns, too. Schools, especially those heavily influenced by teachers’ unions, could impose permanent online-only days. Delhi, India is already using a version of this concept to crack down on smog pollution.
ADVERTISEMENT

At the same time, either through direct government fiat or due to ineffective green energy policies, some areas of the country could regularly experience California-style rolling blackouts. And as fossil fuels (and nuclear power) go by the wayside, consumers may be prevented from buying new gasoline cars, lawnmowers, or chainsaws.

Significant measures are already being planned to combat climate change. California will ban the sale of gasoline cars in 13 years, as will Germany. Britain plans to do the same in just eight. Prohibiting internal combustion engines could save the planet, the argument goes. As each negative weather event is blamed on climate change, government will increasingly use its restrictive tools.

While deaths from natural disasters have fallen by two-thirds over the past five decades, mostly thanks to technological innovations, elites insist that climate change is the “biggest threat modern humans have ever faced.” Climate lockdowns and other restrictions will be framed as saving the people of the United States, and the world, from themselves. What goal could be more noble?

Anyone against such measures could be labeled a “climate denier” who stands against progress — or simply a “domestic terrorist.” Defectors likely won’t have much choice, anyhow. Facial recognition and plate-reading software, coupled with the impressive scope of drones, could lead to severe enforcement. Don’t like the restrictions on your gas guzzler? The government could easily track its location and send automatic tickets — or worse. The ability for officials to depend on a significant minority of zealous supporters to enforce measures is invaluable, as well. How many COVID “Karens” justify their fanaticism by contrasting themselves with uneducated, rural Donald Trump supporters?

But don’t expect the new rules to apply to everyone equally. During the pandemic, elites don’t wear masks in private — only their servers, drivers and cleaners do. You will be held responsible for your personal carbon footprint, enforced by either law or social convention. But climate evangelists such as Jeff Bezos or “climate czar” John Kerry will receive special dispensations for their carbon use.'

I concur with my friend SFC (Join to see)'s response as well as my friend CMSgt Marcus Falleaf .
FYI SMSgt Lawrence McCarter Maj Bill Smith, Ph.D. [MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D. SPC Nancy Greene PO2 (Join to see) PO3 Lynn Spalding PO1 Sam Deel MSG Greg KellySSG Michael Noll Sgt (Join to see) CSM Bob Stanek LTC Thomas Tennant 1LT Voyle SmithSSG Donald H "Don" Bates SMSgt David A Asbury TSgt David L.
(5)
Comment
(0)
SFC Senior Civil Engineer/Annuitant
SFC (Join to see)
2 y
Good morning sir. Thank you for the factual link you provided.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Consultant
5
5
0
6c46716
The world’s climate has *always* been changing. For sure, there is documented evidence of sea level rise around the world as well as ice melt in Greenland. Unfortunately there = far too many sorcerer’s apprentices peddlIng pseudo-science and alarmism and drownIng out real science and how to best address keeping high and dry . Hmmm, where have I seen that before.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPDSoFgivPA
(5)
Comment
(0)
SFC Senior Civil Engineer/Annuitant
SFC (Join to see)
2 y
I was educated by the ACCO and they will be the first to tell you they are not the experts in what they teach, however they make the argument that carbon dioxide can't be good for the world... so what harm would it be if we were to reduce it or eliminate it. Plants need carbon dioxide to live, essentially, it's how they breath. They have NOAA in their pockets since NOAA made an office for global warming, and a NOAA Official spoke very prominently in the classes I attended. Attached is some of the stuff they peddle, they are very slick and if you don't have a good science/engineering background they will buffalo you.
https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-global-temperature
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close