The End Of Trump's Reign Could Be Way Sooner Than You Think

SPC Randy Semanko - Good point

SSG Jessica Bautista - The longer the pregnancy, the larger the placenta and more vascular it becomes with greater risk for bleeding. We are pretty good at doing most procedures in 2016 however some remain with greater risk. A huge concern I have with abortion is government over sight. The government has had a large role in making healthcare safe and it has been for our general good except abortions. If you go to your dentist and they say it is unsafe to give you 5mg PO versed for sedation for wisdom teeth removal, no one complains. If the government says all abortion clinics must meet the same standards as other outpatient surgery clinics, pro-choice advocates scream loud and far that we are trying to control abortion. One of the requirements in the Texas law was that abortion providers have admit privileges at a hospital within 30miles. All it really takes for that provider to have said privileges is to contact administration at that hospital, get credentialed, and they are done. Direct admission streamlines the process and for someone bleeding out, I think it is important and if the provider is unwilling to take those steps, I have to question why. Thirty miles to a hospital is reasonable and even then, you are looking at a minimum 35min by helo from clinic to major facility if something goes bad. I believe the Texas case went all the way to the Supreme Court because several clinics could not or would not meet these safer requirements and would need to close. The law did not stop abortion in Texas, all it was going to do was say loud and clear, You have to drive further for an abortion and these are the safest clinics. The left likes to champion they are for women and I have always been at a loss how that can be when a basic right under Roe V. Wade is not allowed to be the safest it can be.

MAJ Byron Oyler - And I can appreciate the precautions for late-term abortions, but a majority are done earlier, and don't require a hospital setting. Vasectomies are actually more invasive, and those are done in doctor's offices. As far as Texas goes, it was clear to us that the restrictions were only put in place in order to limit access. http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_57717093e4b017b379f6cb23

SSG Jessica Bautista - Vasectomies are no where more invasive with the exception of abortions ended with PO meds however those still present a greater risk to a women's health than a vasectomy to a male. This here is a significant reason abortions remain under regulated, folks like you that think you know what is safe and unsafe here and base pro-choice decision off of it. Ever seen a man's health center, especially on a military post where a majority of soldiers are male? No you have not and the reason is a female's health is much more complicated. Significant risks are incurred just from birth control to the point that my wife and I decided I was the one to get fixed. There is so much under education into women's health on the pro-choice side and it is sad that people chose politics over the health of women in this county; saddest part is the Democrats believing and fooling women everywhere that they are the biggest advocates for women-they are not.

As you have noted, this is a humor site. The article has only one point: elections for the house and Senate are in two years. Everything else is humor. Thank you.

Wow, SSG (Join to see), we actually agree on something.

PO2 Robert Aitchison - Your sarcasm is well deserved, I doubt they will be getting right on that. It may take another election or two before they come out of denial.

CDR Michael Goldschmidt - Is that really the first time?

SSG (Join to see) - If memory serves.