Posted on Aug 28, 2016
Veterans Are Key Allies in the Fight to Reduce Gun Violence
1.91K
79
30
5
4
1
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 13
I love how it is called gun violence as if the gun did something itself. They were in the hands of criminals, terrorists and lunatics. We need to work on keeping them out of the wrong hands not passing laws to punish people that legally own and are not criminals. This should be non negotiable for anyone that supports and defends the Constitution of the United States. His commentary is laced with inaccuracies or at least gross misrepresentation.
This is a whopper:
"Right now under federal law, felons, domestic abusers and the dangerously mentally ill have the option of buying a gun without a background check and with no questions asked. Even people who are considered by the Federal Bureau of Investigation to be a known or suspected terrorist can pass a background check and legally buy a gun."
Unless they are buying them illegally or they are buying them from an individual owner this is not accurate. I have filled out paperwork every time I have purchased a weapon and I had a check that would make a proctologist smile when I got my conceal carry license.
Innocent lives are at stake because we allow the criminal and the crazies on the streets or we early release them. It isn't really hard to figure out if you are being honest. The crime committed by legal gun owners is next to none. Violent crime is down overall but it is way up in about a dozen major US cities. The general is another rube worried about the wrong things to align with the political structure on the left. Sad but true.
This is a whopper:
"Right now under federal law, felons, domestic abusers and the dangerously mentally ill have the option of buying a gun without a background check and with no questions asked. Even people who are considered by the Federal Bureau of Investigation to be a known or suspected terrorist can pass a background check and legally buy a gun."
Unless they are buying them illegally or they are buying them from an individual owner this is not accurate. I have filled out paperwork every time I have purchased a weapon and I had a check that would make a proctologist smile when I got my conceal carry license.
Innocent lives are at stake because we allow the criminal and the crazies on the streets or we early release them. It isn't really hard to figure out if you are being honest. The crime committed by legal gun owners is next to none. Violent crime is down overall but it is way up in about a dozen major US cities. The general is another rube worried about the wrong things to align with the political structure on the left. Sad but true.
(10)
(0)
SGT Damaso V Santana
Basically crime happens in the ghetto cities controlled in every conceivable way by demorats, without Chicago, Detrot, Los Angeles, Baltimore and DC being included, the US would be among the last places for crime.
Crime and Illegal Immigration are two Tradermarks of the demoratic party, they control votes and keep people down, which is the "Entitled" class that can assure them votes.
Crime and Illegal Immigration are two Tradermarks of the demoratic party, they control votes and keep people down, which is the "Entitled" class that can assure them votes.
(2)
(0)
More proof to me that sadly, promotion to that high of a rank is more about politics than it is about military proficiency. So many misstatements, so many twisted presentations of facts, that they can only be intentional.
Nightclubs, schools, and movie theaters are not battlefields, combat zones, or theaters of war. All of those military terms imply two sides are fighting against each other, while the truth is liberal gun-free zone laws prevent one side from fighting. Those places don't become battlegrounds until the cops show up.
Also, the term "gun violence" has a negative connotation that it shouldn't have. It should be a neutral term. Gun violence in the commission of a crime is certainly a bad thing, but gun violence used to end those crimes is a good thing. The bullet wounds inflicted by police guns are every bit as violent as those inflicted by criminal guns, but nobody seems to mind.
By extension, any gun violence used to stop a violent crime should be considered a good thing, even if that gun violence is initiated by someone other than cops.
Gen. Peter Chiarelli, you say, "Extremist groups like al-Qaeda and ISIS have long urged their followers to use our country’s weak gun laws to acquire deadly weapons and commit active shooter terrorism here in America." But why is it those terrorists always choose gun-free zones to do their active shooter terrorism? Why do we protect our leaders with guns, but we protect our children with no-guns-allowed signs?
Nightclubs, schools, and movie theaters are not battlefields, combat zones, or theaters of war. All of those military terms imply two sides are fighting against each other, while the truth is liberal gun-free zone laws prevent one side from fighting. Those places don't become battlegrounds until the cops show up.
Also, the term "gun violence" has a negative connotation that it shouldn't have. It should be a neutral term. Gun violence in the commission of a crime is certainly a bad thing, but gun violence used to end those crimes is a good thing. The bullet wounds inflicted by police guns are every bit as violent as those inflicted by criminal guns, but nobody seems to mind.
By extension, any gun violence used to stop a violent crime should be considered a good thing, even if that gun violence is initiated by someone other than cops.
Gen. Peter Chiarelli, you say, "Extremist groups like al-Qaeda and ISIS have long urged their followers to use our country’s weak gun laws to acquire deadly weapons and commit active shooter terrorism here in America." But why is it those terrorists always choose gun-free zones to do their active shooter terrorism? Why do we protect our leaders with guns, but we protect our children with no-guns-allowed signs?
(8)
(0)
SGT Damaso V Santana
Spot On! SSgt Christopher Brose The words used by said general are intended to confuse and promote an agenda. Same as Generals and Admirals coming out in support of a Corrupt Lying Criminal, what does that make them?
(2)
(0)
Capt Seid Waddell
SSgt Christopher Brose, I have heard it said that one can rise to O-6 through competence alone, but to rise above that rank requires politics.
(2)
(0)
Two things need to happen, my humble opinion:
1.Progressive and liberals need to stop trying to infringe the Second Amendment. They know damn well that lawful gun owners do not commit crimes.
2. The fbi and other institutions need to start enforcing the laws already in the books, it is a fact that the fbi knew about the islamic jihadist who assaulted the Orlando club, they dropped the ball, same as conveniently, the Immigration Laws are ignored by progressive and liberals, aided and abetted by a deficient, weak and to the point of treason republican dominated Congress.
To believe otherwise is to have already become a zombie and a victim of State Run Media.
1.Progressive and liberals need to stop trying to infringe the Second Amendment. They know damn well that lawful gun owners do not commit crimes.
2. The fbi and other institutions need to start enforcing the laws already in the books, it is a fact that the fbi knew about the islamic jihadist who assaulted the Orlando club, they dropped the ball, same as conveniently, the Immigration Laws are ignored by progressive and liberals, aided and abetted by a deficient, weak and to the point of treason republican dominated Congress.
To believe otherwise is to have already become a zombie and a victim of State Run Media.
(5)
(0)
CW3 Harvey K.
All the proposals for more laws are directed at the same people, the law-abiding. Criminals willing to ignore the laws against armed robbery, rape, and murder -- "malum in se" (bad by their very nature) are not deterred by any sort of administrative, bureaucratic, burden imposed on the law-abiding.
Those "malum prohibito" laws (bad only because there is a law against it) can be woven into an intricate bureaucratic web; designed to inhibit, discourage, intimidate and frustrate a citizen wishing to exercise his 2nd Amendment rights.
This technique is described by Jack, the tyrannical leader of the choir boys in "Lord of the Flies":
“We’ll have RULES!” he cried excitedly. “LOTS OF RULES! Then when anyone breaks ‘em-”
“Whee-oh!”
“Wacco!”
“Bong!”
“Doink!” (EMPHASIS added)
Those "malum prohibito" laws (bad only because there is a law against it) can be woven into an intricate bureaucratic web; designed to inhibit, discourage, intimidate and frustrate a citizen wishing to exercise his 2nd Amendment rights.
This technique is described by Jack, the tyrannical leader of the choir boys in "Lord of the Flies":
“We’ll have RULES!” he cried excitedly. “LOTS OF RULES! Then when anyone breaks ‘em-”
“Whee-oh!”
“Wacco!”
“Bong!”
“Doink!” (EMPHASIS added)
(2)
(0)
Read This Next