Posted on May 16, 2022
Why does the US Army persist with the rank of SP4?
86.4K
1.38K
326
292
292
0
Responses: 163
It think the question isn't why their are still spec 4s, but instead why their are not still spec 5-9s. NCOs are leaders. Not everyone has the interest or quite frankly the capability to be a good leader. We are dealing with an increasingly technical needs in warfighting. In order to attract and keep the talent we need, we need to recognize that the need to keep senior technical people. This means they need to achieve higher ranks as they get more knowledgeable (including higher pay); either by higher enlisted ranks or by warrant officers (or more likely a by lot more of both).
A mistake a lot of organizations make is moving their best technical people to management when they don't have the capability for it or interest in it. Without an alternate career path, they just leave those organizations or sit unhappily when they reach their level of management incompetence.
I understand the question to some extent in the context of combat arms MOSes but as we watch Russia in Ukraine play out we understand what happens when we ignore the other parts of the force we need.
A mistake a lot of organizations make is moving their best technical people to management when they don't have the capability for it or interest in it. Without an alternate career path, they just leave those organizations or sit unhappily when they reach their level of management incompetence.
I understand the question to some extent in the context of combat arms MOSes but as we watch Russia in Ukraine play out we understand what happens when we ignore the other parts of the force we need.
(235)
(0)
SPC Michael Terrell
SSgt Former18thASMKadena83 Atkinson - I was 26T20. I left active duty after two years, because I got no respect, or cooperation to let me do my job. A lazy E-8 lifer who couldn't figure out how to schedule three people to provide seven day a week operation of an AFRTS TV station, so you worked two days, got three off, worked two more. The next week, you just worked the three days. This just used two of us, while the third did nothing . My MOS was Depot level, so I not only ran the station 50% of the time, I spent additional time keeping the station running. I averaged 140 hours, every two weeks yet that ass would volunteer me for additional duty on /my days off'.
I also had 'rank' try to tell me how to do my job, when they had never been to a TV station, let alone maintain one. The Base Information Officer informed me that I needed to 'polish the hand tools, and paint the inside of the tool cabinet'. I was to 'Keep the studio floor so shiny' that he could see his ugly face which wasn't allowed per our SOP.
I told him where to go when he tried to confiscate the equipment manuals which would only be issued 'if and when he deemed it necessary'. I told him that if he touched the, that I would break his fingernails all the way to his elbows, and ordered him to leave the restricted area which was off limits to everyone but the operator on duty. He called me a 'Insubordinate SOB', and called our General. He needed a mew ass when the General finished, and was told to stay out of my way.
I also had 'rank' try to tell me how to do my job, when they had never been to a TV station, let alone maintain one. The Base Information Officer informed me that I needed to 'polish the hand tools, and paint the inside of the tool cabinet'. I was to 'Keep the studio floor so shiny' that he could see his ugly face which wasn't allowed per our SOP.
I told him where to go when he tried to confiscate the equipment manuals which would only be issued 'if and when he deemed it necessary'. I told him that if he touched the, that I would break his fingernails all the way to his elbows, and ordered him to leave the restricted area which was off limits to everyone but the operator on duty. He called me a 'Insubordinate SOB', and called our General. He needed a mew ass when the General finished, and was told to stay out of my way.
(7)
(0)
SP5 Wick Humble
I was SPC 5,and was offered SPC 6 to re-up in 1970; but I wanted to return to college and got a little 'early out'. With a BA, I had gotten a CAS (civilian acquired skill) MOS of 81E20, which they were going to uprate to E30, the section SFC said. Getting drafted (didn't have a bone spur until I was 75!) wasn't too lucky, but that assignment sure was! A lot of GI-draftees coughed up another enlistment year to get it, and still wound up in 'Nam.
(1)
(0)
SP5 Wick Humble
In modern parlance, I guess sergeants are leaders, but... where were all the hard-five and above at our base Ft. Sam, when NCO roles were needed? I pulled Company CQ, Asst. Staff Duty NCO, Sgt of the Guard, and other mostly over-nite jobs numerous times in my six months as SPC-5. We were the pool of after-hours does and goers when all the officers and senior NCO's (and MFSS had a LOT!) were in the old rack!
What a bring down it was for the SPC-4's on guard duty when it was discovered that the Army had not bothered to equip SPC-5 Humble, J., with a GI driver's license! Those nights I was chauffeured! A little harder to catch a few winks, but... Only 55-years ago...
What a bring down it was for the SPC-4's on guard duty when it was discovered that the Army had not bothered to equip SPC-5 Humble, J., with a GI driver's license! Those nights I was chauffeured! A little harder to catch a few winks, but... Only 55-years ago...
(1)
(0)
SPC Edward Abney
Spot on, Specialist Ford! There is a critical need for retention of technical talent in the Army, and, insisting that enlisted in these MOS must go through all the requirements to become a NCO to progress up the ladder is pushing these enlisted out of the Army and into the civilian sector. Bring back the Specialist ranks, ASAP!
(1)
(0)
It's because in the Army an E4 is not a team leader. An E5 is a team leader, E4 is a pay grade that is a natural progression from E1. That means that an E1 and E4 can hold the same exact position by grade and MTOE. Obviously you can't just make everyone a corporal once they make two years in service. It's kind of like why do we have 2LTs and 1LTs?
Why don't we get rid of that and make people earn E4 in the Army? Probably because E3s don't make anything, not that E4s make much more. An E3 with three years is making under $30,000 a year. It's hard to reenlist someone who feels broke and doesn't see their selves getting promoted.
Why don't we get rid of that and make people earn E4 in the Army? Probably because E3s don't make anything, not that E4s make much more. An E3 with three years is making under $30,000 a year. It's hard to reenlist someone who feels broke and doesn't see their selves getting promoted.
(76)
(0)
SFC Patrick Tipton
SGT Robert Wager Correct you are. Hardest promotion to get is Corporal. Hardest tangible object for a Corporal to get...anyone....a unit coin. The Army and local leadership is the most stingy with those to things.
(0)
(0)
SPC David OLin
There was to much Old buddy things happening to get a promotion to E-5 for me.
If you didn't have the right NCO that liked you forget about being promoted.
So, I like the Air Force which my son is in, which you take a test to get promoted up to E-6. No board until after that.
If you didn't have the right NCO that liked you forget about being promoted.
So, I like the Air Force which my son is in, which you take a test to get promoted up to E-6. No board until after that.
(1)
(0)
SP5 Wick Humble
Only two things I was proud of 'accomplishing' in the Army: easily qualifying as Expert on the M-14, and making SPC 5 in the minimum amount of time in grade/time in service. The money helped (still under $300/mo in 1970) but also I got to avoid the chow line at the EM Mess, and eat in the officers -- which had table cloths and sometimes flowers on the table! Funny, it's almost impossible to find 'subdued' SPC 5 rank patches now. So long ago... !
(1)
(0)
SPC Edward Abney
I totally disagree SFC! You don't seem to realize that you are messing with the E4 Mafia! Kidding aside, the Army should split off the war fighters, and the technicals, into two different lanes of rank progression. NCO's belong in combat organizations, Specialists in technical organizations. The Army is bleeding technical talent by forcing all to move up the NCO ladder.
(0)
(0)
I'm totally for bringing back the Technical Ranks. The Army has a glaring blind spot in its philosophy toward NCO's. I'm not sure how something so obvious can be so blatantly overlooked, but the Army somehow automatically lumps together "Leader" and "Leadership". Those two words are related, but not mutually exclusive, nor does one automatically lead to the other.
A Leader is such, based on position, rank, social hierarchy, or some other form of placement. Leadership has many qualities, some subtle, some pretty obvious, but it's one of those things, that "you know it when you see it"... you either have it, or you learn it, but It should not be summarily attached to a rank, and it's it's reason why the NCO Corp struggles at times. Some guys are great worker bee's that there is nothing wrong with that. Placing them in a position they clearly have no desire for, nor the qualities to embrace it does every Soldier a disservice.
*rant complete
A Leader is such, based on position, rank, social hierarchy, or some other form of placement. Leadership has many qualities, some subtle, some pretty obvious, but it's one of those things, that "you know it when you see it"... you either have it, or you learn it, but It should not be summarily attached to a rank, and it's it's reason why the NCO Corp struggles at times. Some guys are great worker bee's that there is nothing wrong with that. Placing them in a position they clearly have no desire for, nor the qualities to embrace it does every Soldier a disservice.
*rant complete
(51)
(0)
SPC Michael Terrell
I tested out of the Army's hardest Electronics school in 1972, while in Basic. I was told that no one had ever done it, and never would. I scored over 93%. I was assigned to a TV station at Ft. Greely, with two men who had gone through that school. They had no hands on experience, but I had seven years, at just 20 years old. One of the two was a useless alcoholic, while the other struggled to do actual troubleshooting. I'm still in contact with him, and he still thanks me for teaching him mre than the Army school, or any other job that he's had in thee 50 years.
I was taught 'Logical troubleshooting' starting at 13 years old. Quickly find the real problem, and fix it properly the first time. Avoid temporary fixes, whenever possible.
The Station Manager wanted me court martialed 'for destruction of Government property' after I built a replacement TV tuner for a piece of test equipment. The OEM part was NLA, and a custom built part would cost more than the equipment was worth. By the time the dust settled, I was promoted to SP4, at just 18 months. I've newer played nicely with fools.
I was taught 'Logical troubleshooting' starting at 13 years old. Quickly find the real problem, and fix it properly the first time. Avoid temporary fixes, whenever possible.
The Station Manager wanted me court martialed 'for destruction of Government property' after I built a replacement TV tuner for a piece of test equipment. The OEM part was NLA, and a custom built part would cost more than the equipment was worth. By the time the dust settled, I was promoted to SP4, at just 18 months. I've newer played nicely with fools.
(2)
(0)
SPC David OLin
SGT (Join to see) - Cpl. should be removed altogether or SP4 should be removed. If the goal is to be an NCO then keep Cpl.
(1)
(0)
CPT Bob Mason
SGT (Join to see) - I was on active duty in the early70’s when up-or-out was thrust on us. I personally knew an E-6 and an E-7 who loved their jobs and were exceptionally effective at it who left the Army becsuse they did not want the higher rank and responsibilities.
(0)
(0)
SP5 Wick Humble
On Okinawa in X Army, my dad wore three over one rocker, plus a 'T', but when promoted after the Japanese surrender, his patch was changed to three over two rockers, but was called "Technical Sergeant" as a rank title. Neither of these was 'Staff' or 'Sergeant First Class". Though he was in the fighting, he was assigned to a HQ Company in the Signal Corps. He died in 1958 -- as a result of a pack-a-day habit on unfiltered Lucky Strikes he'd picked up on Okie -- so I can't ask him to decipher it. Still have his Ike Jacket.
Better question: why is a low private rank E-3 called 'First Class' but the aforementioned senior rank E-7 called 'First Class' also? Quirky! I've had to try to explain that to a lot of civilian types. And then there are the Navy rank/rating!!
I was told in 1969 that the Army had Spec 4's just because they didn't want too many Corporals! BTW, lots of SP5's in 'Nam had command roles in combat, and never got 'hard stripes.' I was offered 'hard five' at Ft. Sam if I'd be barracks sergeant, however. Too close to ETS!
Better question: why is a low private rank E-3 called 'First Class' but the aforementioned senior rank E-7 called 'First Class' also? Quirky! I've had to try to explain that to a lot of civilian types. And then there are the Navy rank/rating!!
I was told in 1969 that the Army had Spec 4's just because they didn't want too many Corporals! BTW, lots of SP5's in 'Nam had command roles in combat, and never got 'hard stripes.' I was offered 'hard five' at Ft. Sam if I'd be barracks sergeant, however. Too close to ETS!
(0)
(0)
Bring back SP4-SP9. Leave troop pushing to the CPLs - CSMs. With the technological aspect of warfighting growing ever more complex and specialized, there is plenty of room for a fourth career track. If you can't stand the idea of SP9 rank on the current pinks and greens, then go back to 1943 and create them as Technician grades. The point is, these folks need to be retained and recognized accordingly. Makes total sense to me. SP and Tech ranks didn't destroy the army then and they won't now. The fact that it would probably rub a lot of CSMs the wrong way is really immaterial.
(31)
(0)
(3)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
That would make sense if the Army was the same size. Unfortunately the Army keeps downsizing and hiring DACs and contractors to fill those positions.
(1)
(0)
(0)
(0)
They should have kept all the Specialist Ranks. People can be excellent at their job skills and never be a leader. They are very valuable to the military and with the specialist rank structure, were paid for their skills and had a rewarding military career.
(21)
(0)
PO2 Steven Southard
The "up or out" and being forced into a management role is one of the biggest reasons I separated.
(0)
(0)
Back in 1972, I was a SP4. We wore khaki uniforms back then. My SP4 eagle was sown on my sleeves. I had bloused boots, since I was in the 82nd Airborne. I went to my brother’s wedding, and at the reception, his new father in law asked when I had made Eagle Scout. I was very embarrassed. I did not want to wear my uniform in public until I made sergeant. I was in Korea, when I made SP5. They would not let me into the NCO club at Camp Casey. I begged the 1SG, and he and the CO made me an acting sergeant. I still have those orders.
(19)
(0)
SPC Steve dePinet
In '78-82, when we wore Khaki (then called Tropical Wear or TW), it was with low quarter shoes. I would much rather have worn Combat Boots with them, bloused, as you say. They truly weren't khakis, they were permanent press. When I was working in Greeley Hall (on Ft. Huachuca), my NCOIC told me that the SGM had said that if I wanted to keep wearing the fatigues (that I had work my entire time in Germany), he could get me transferred to a tactical Signal Outfit, if not, I could wear TWs. I really preferred the fatigues, though. OTOH, that was while the Army was transitioning to the campy pajammies, which I had no intention of buying or wearing... I ETS'd not longer after that. Still wear combat boots...
(1)
(0)
Anthony Marston
MAJ Norm Michaels - SLIGHT WORD ERROR ABOVE OF ' sown ' S/B ' sewn ' FOR FUTURE REFERENCE - ALL THE BEST - CM
(0)
(0)
SPC Edward Abney
SPC Steve dePinet - SPC dePinet, when I was in, (62-65), Khaki and TW were two different items. Khakis were cotton, and could be worn as casual or dress. Casual was short sleeves, pants, low quarters, and barracks cap. Dress Khaki consisted of long sleeve shirt, tie, tucked into your shirt, low quarters, and barracks cap. TW's were tropical worsted wool, and usually only worn by WO's and officers. In hotter climates, Khaki shorts were worn with calf-length socks. Khaki was worn during the summer months.
(0)
(0)
Specialist ranks made perfect sense for those in technical fields. They should be brought back.
(15)
(0)
SSG Byron Hewett
SPC Woody Bullard - hey at least I knew where to when something was needed off the books or not found anywhere close by you guys always had the best pogee bait out in the field
(2)
(0)
Actually the "social experiment" goes back a lot further than the creation of "Specialist" grades. The Army created "Technician" ranks during WWII
The basis then and now has always been the problem that the military is required by law to tie rank and pay grade together regardless of the practical necessity to pay some people more for their technical skills than their leadership skills
In fact, when the Army created the Specialist ranks, they attempted to bypass the law by declaring that ALL the specialist ranks were below Corporal within the army even though comparability with other services was by pay grade. That tap-dance was later overruled with each specialist grade then ranking below the equivalent NCO grade.
Now that only the lowest Special grade remains (renamed from SP4 to SPC) there is really little justification for it at all, because now we have highly qualified technical specialists like computer programmers and medical technicians who rise to senior NCO ranks without being expected to develop the leadership skills appropriate to their ranks.
The basis then and now has always been the problem that the military is required by law to tie rank and pay grade together regardless of the practical necessity to pay some people more for their technical skills than their leadership skills
In fact, when the Army created the Specialist ranks, they attempted to bypass the law by declaring that ALL the specialist ranks were below Corporal within the army even though comparability with other services was by pay grade. That tap-dance was later overruled with each specialist grade then ranking below the equivalent NCO grade.
Now that only the lowest Special grade remains (renamed from SP4 to SPC) there is really little justification for it at all, because now we have highly qualified technical specialists like computer programmers and medical technicians who rise to senior NCO ranks without being expected to develop the leadership skills appropriate to their ranks.
(12)
(0)
SPC Woody Bullard
Interesting remembering the Technician Ranks used during WW II.
The T placed under the chevrons set the rank apart from NCO ranks.
My father was a Technician Fifth Grade T/5 in WW II. Dad told me
the guys called him a Tech Corporal. Dad in center with his two joker
buddies holding machetes against his neck on Saipan.
The T placed under the chevrons set the rank apart from NCO ranks.
My father was a Technician Fifth Grade T/5 in WW II. Dad told me
the guys called him a Tech Corporal. Dad in center with his two joker
buddies holding machetes against his neck on Saipan.
(4)
(0)
Read This Next