Posted on Feb 18, 2018
2-star to lose one star over texts to wife of enlisted soldier
7.17K
56
9
13
13
0
Sucks when you’re dumb. Glad he’s being forced out....makes leaders look bad.
2-star to lose one star over texts to wife of enlisted soldier
Posted from armytimes.com
Retirement
MG
Soldiers
Rank
Job Loss
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 6
9
9
0
Thanks SSG(P) (Join to see) for sharing the update on Maj. Gen. Joseph Harrington who has been demoted by one grade to Brigadier General.
"The Army retired Harrington at the lower rank because it is the last one at which he had served satisfactorily, said Cynthia Smith, an Army spokeswoman."
I am glad that he seems to repentant to some degree "In a statement, Harrington wrote that he “made a mistake by responding to and entering into a private discussion with a soldier’s spouse.
“While we both considered it a friendship-based conversation, it is clear that the discussion should not have occurred. I hope others can learn from and avoid my mistake.”
Image: Maj Gen. Joseph Harrington in happier times
Below is the somewhat biased article from USA Today.
"We believe that appropriate action was taken, and consider the matter closed," Smith said.
WASHINGTON — The Army stripped a star from a general who flirted on social media with the wife of an enlisted man, finding his actions "dissolute and immoral," and forced him to retire, the Army announced Friday.
Maj. Gen. Joseph Harrington will lose one rank in retirement after the Army determined he had engaged in inappropriate online communication with the woman in more than 1,000 messages. Harrington had been in charge of U.S. Army Africa from a base in Italy when the relationship, first reported by USA TODAY, became known in August.
Harrington and the woman had exchanged Facebook messages for four months. The messages ranged from the friendly to flirty. She is married to an American soldier over whom Harrington had jurisdiction under military law.
The Army issued Harrington a letter of reprimand, a career-killer. The letter, also released Friday, noted that Harrington, while not found guilty of a crime, was expected to behave honorably on and off duty.
"Over the course of four months, you participated in the exchange of flirtatious messages with the spouse of an enlisted soldier," the letter states. "This behavior reflects poorly on you as a senior officer and commander."
Harrington, in a written statement, apologized to his family and the Army.
"I made a mistake by responding to and entering into a private discussion with a soldier's spouse," Harrington wrote. "While we both considered it a friendship-based conversation, it is clear that the discussion should not have occurred. I hope others can learn from and avoid my mistake."
Stripping his rank and ending Harrington's career are appropriate moves by the Army, according to a military law expert and advocate for victims of abuse in the military.
"The discipline seems in line with the offense," said Don Christensen, a former chief prosecutor for the Air Force and president of Protect our Defenders, an advocacy group for victims of sexual assault in the military.
Rep. Jackie Speier, a California Democrat and member of the Armed Services Committee, agreed with Christensen that Harrington's punishment was appropriate. But Speier, a critic of the Pentagon's handling of senior officer misconduct, said discipline varies among the ranks.
"What we need to do with all these senior military officials is have some standardization in their punishment," she said. "Some get off with a slap on the wrist. It’s got to be consistent."
Last week, Lt. Gen. David Quantock, the Army's inspector general, testified before Congress that the Army often metes out harsher discipline to generals than lower-ranking soldiers in misconduct cases. Quantock, who signed the investigation into Harrington, said at last week's hearing that the Army "crushes" generals.
1,158 messages
The Army inspector general initiated its investigation after USA TODAY obtained a series of messages Harrington wrote this spring. The inspector general's report also was released Friday. Investigators found 1,158 messages between Harrington and the woman between Feb. 12, 2017, and June 3, 2017.
"The conversations ranging from friendly conversation to flirtatious at times, and included sexual innuendo," the report stated.
The woman who received the messages told USA TODAY last year that the texting began as friendly banter after she had met Harrington at the gym in Vicenza, Italy. She became concerned with the texts when they grew suggestive. The relationship did not become physical, she told investigators.
She also said that she did not feel sexually harassed by Harrington. But she did feel he had "worked" her for three months and perhaps wanted her to send him pictures of herself naked but was too smart to ask for them, according to the report.
In some messages, he focused on the woman’s appearance, referring to her as “HOTTIE," a "Lovely tease" and “looking good for sure.” In another series he wrote: "You seem to have a great modeling resume! Truly! Though I hadn’t noticed! Where is your hubby tonight? Work?”
When she replied that she’d fought with her husband and that he was asleep, Harrington responded: “I’m sorry! Make up se…x is fun”
Harrington suggested “U can be my nurse,” and added, “I’d enjoy being in a tent with U.”
Harrington acknowledged sending the messages. However, he told investigators they were "not quite salacious" but leading in that direction, according to the report.
"I hope u delete this exchange!"
Harrington also urged her at times to erase records of their chats.
"I hope u delete this exchange!" he wrote at one point. At another: "Why not delete after communicating?"
Investigators found his repeated attempts to keep their relationship secret showed he knew it was out of bounds.
"Harrington's attempts to conceal and keep the conversation secret indicated that he knew the conversation was inappropriate and above board," the report says.
The inspector general concluded that Harrington "failed to display exemplary conduct" in engaging with the woman. News of the relationship caused "anger and polarization" at the base.
"Maj. Gen. Harrington's online statements, his choice of vocabulary, and sexual innuendo with (the woman) were not good examples of virtue and honor," the report says. "His actions negatively impacted the command climate and readiness of the (Vicenza Military Community), were dissolute and immoral, and not an example of the exemplary conduct expected of an Army senior leader."
The Army retired Harrington at the lower rank because it is the last one at which he had served satisfactorily, said Cynthia Smith, an Army spokeswoman.
"We believe that appropriate action was taken, and consider the matter closed," Smith said."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/02/16/army-strips-star-general-over-flirty-texts-wife-enlisted-soldier/343190002/
FYI COL Mikel J. Burroughs LTC Stephen C. LTC Orlando Illi LTC (Join to see) LTC Ivan Raiklin, Esq. Maj Bill Smith, Ph.D. Capt Seid Waddell Capt Jeff S. CPT Jack Durish MSgt Robert C Aldi SFC Stephen King MSgt Danny Hope SGT Gregory Lawritson Cpl Craig Marton SP5 Mark Kuzinski SGT (Join to see) Maj Marty Hogan SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
"The Army retired Harrington at the lower rank because it is the last one at which he had served satisfactorily, said Cynthia Smith, an Army spokeswoman."
I am glad that he seems to repentant to some degree "In a statement, Harrington wrote that he “made a mistake by responding to and entering into a private discussion with a soldier’s spouse.
“While we both considered it a friendship-based conversation, it is clear that the discussion should not have occurred. I hope others can learn from and avoid my mistake.”
Image: Maj Gen. Joseph Harrington in happier times
Below is the somewhat biased article from USA Today.
"We believe that appropriate action was taken, and consider the matter closed," Smith said.
WASHINGTON — The Army stripped a star from a general who flirted on social media with the wife of an enlisted man, finding his actions "dissolute and immoral," and forced him to retire, the Army announced Friday.
Maj. Gen. Joseph Harrington will lose one rank in retirement after the Army determined he had engaged in inappropriate online communication with the woman in more than 1,000 messages. Harrington had been in charge of U.S. Army Africa from a base in Italy when the relationship, first reported by USA TODAY, became known in August.
Harrington and the woman had exchanged Facebook messages for four months. The messages ranged from the friendly to flirty. She is married to an American soldier over whom Harrington had jurisdiction under military law.
The Army issued Harrington a letter of reprimand, a career-killer. The letter, also released Friday, noted that Harrington, while not found guilty of a crime, was expected to behave honorably on and off duty.
"Over the course of four months, you participated in the exchange of flirtatious messages with the spouse of an enlisted soldier," the letter states. "This behavior reflects poorly on you as a senior officer and commander."
Harrington, in a written statement, apologized to his family and the Army.
"I made a mistake by responding to and entering into a private discussion with a soldier's spouse," Harrington wrote. "While we both considered it a friendship-based conversation, it is clear that the discussion should not have occurred. I hope others can learn from and avoid my mistake."
Stripping his rank and ending Harrington's career are appropriate moves by the Army, according to a military law expert and advocate for victims of abuse in the military.
"The discipline seems in line with the offense," said Don Christensen, a former chief prosecutor for the Air Force and president of Protect our Defenders, an advocacy group for victims of sexual assault in the military.
Rep. Jackie Speier, a California Democrat and member of the Armed Services Committee, agreed with Christensen that Harrington's punishment was appropriate. But Speier, a critic of the Pentagon's handling of senior officer misconduct, said discipline varies among the ranks.
"What we need to do with all these senior military officials is have some standardization in their punishment," she said. "Some get off with a slap on the wrist. It’s got to be consistent."
Last week, Lt. Gen. David Quantock, the Army's inspector general, testified before Congress that the Army often metes out harsher discipline to generals than lower-ranking soldiers in misconduct cases. Quantock, who signed the investigation into Harrington, said at last week's hearing that the Army "crushes" generals.
1,158 messages
The Army inspector general initiated its investigation after USA TODAY obtained a series of messages Harrington wrote this spring. The inspector general's report also was released Friday. Investigators found 1,158 messages between Harrington and the woman between Feb. 12, 2017, and June 3, 2017.
"The conversations ranging from friendly conversation to flirtatious at times, and included sexual innuendo," the report stated.
The woman who received the messages told USA TODAY last year that the texting began as friendly banter after she had met Harrington at the gym in Vicenza, Italy. She became concerned with the texts when they grew suggestive. The relationship did not become physical, she told investigators.
She also said that she did not feel sexually harassed by Harrington. But she did feel he had "worked" her for three months and perhaps wanted her to send him pictures of herself naked but was too smart to ask for them, according to the report.
In some messages, he focused on the woman’s appearance, referring to her as “HOTTIE," a "Lovely tease" and “looking good for sure.” In another series he wrote: "You seem to have a great modeling resume! Truly! Though I hadn’t noticed! Where is your hubby tonight? Work?”
When she replied that she’d fought with her husband and that he was asleep, Harrington responded: “I’m sorry! Make up se…x is fun”
Harrington suggested “U can be my nurse,” and added, “I’d enjoy being in a tent with U.”
Harrington acknowledged sending the messages. However, he told investigators they were "not quite salacious" but leading in that direction, according to the report.
"I hope u delete this exchange!"
Harrington also urged her at times to erase records of their chats.
"I hope u delete this exchange!" he wrote at one point. At another: "Why not delete after communicating?"
Investigators found his repeated attempts to keep their relationship secret showed he knew it was out of bounds.
"Harrington's attempts to conceal and keep the conversation secret indicated that he knew the conversation was inappropriate and above board," the report says.
The inspector general concluded that Harrington "failed to display exemplary conduct" in engaging with the woman. News of the relationship caused "anger and polarization" at the base.
"Maj. Gen. Harrington's online statements, his choice of vocabulary, and sexual innuendo with (the woman) were not good examples of virtue and honor," the report says. "His actions negatively impacted the command climate and readiness of the (Vicenza Military Community), were dissolute and immoral, and not an example of the exemplary conduct expected of an Army senior leader."
The Army retired Harrington at the lower rank because it is the last one at which he had served satisfactorily, said Cynthia Smith, an Army spokeswoman.
"We believe that appropriate action was taken, and consider the matter closed," Smith said."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/02/16/army-strips-star-general-over-flirty-texts-wife-enlisted-soldier/343190002/
FYI COL Mikel J. Burroughs LTC Stephen C. LTC Orlando Illi LTC (Join to see) LTC Ivan Raiklin, Esq. Maj Bill Smith, Ph.D. Capt Seid Waddell Capt Jeff S. CPT Jack Durish MSgt Robert C Aldi SFC Stephen King MSgt Danny Hope SGT Gregory Lawritson Cpl Craig Marton SP5 Mark Kuzinski SGT (Join to see) Maj Marty Hogan SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
Army strips star from general over flirty texts with wife of enlisted soldier
An investigation found that Maj. Gen. Joseph Harrington should lose a star and be forced to retire.
(9)
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
LTC Stephen F. SSG(P) (Join to see) Unless Your Name is King David. This is Probably Not Career Enhancing.
(4)
(0)
Capt Jeff S.
Pride comes before a fall and the bigger they are, the harder they fall.
Clearly, he crossed the line and got what he deserved -- even if it seems a little light. On a positive note, I'm glad to see he was contrite and acknowledged his wrongdoing. Perhaps that factored into his light sentence.
He knows full well the repercussions of what he did. He has lost something he'll never get back -- a good name! This general will not be remembered favorably by his peers. He will be avoided by former friends and colleagues in social circles. His wife has been humiliated and his children will never look at him the same way. His name will likely be used in future officer training classes as an example of how not to conduct yourself as an officer. He will spend the rest of his life kicking himself in the behind for being so stupid.
Clearly, he crossed the line and got what he deserved -- even if it seems a little light. On a positive note, I'm glad to see he was contrite and acknowledged his wrongdoing. Perhaps that factored into his light sentence.
He knows full well the repercussions of what he did. He has lost something he'll never get back -- a good name! This general will not be remembered favorably by his peers. He will be avoided by former friends and colleagues in social circles. His wife has been humiliated and his children will never look at him the same way. His name will likely be used in future officer training classes as an example of how not to conduct yourself as an officer. He will spend the rest of his life kicking himself in the behind for being so stupid.
(4)
(0)
Maj Bill Smith, Ph.D.
He was lucky! These actions embarrass the service and are worthy of being locked up for damaging moral and unermining the chain of command and being an outright asshole. He will probably get a FMS or other Gov't job.
(3)
(0)
7
7
0
6
6
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google