22
22
0
Posted in these groups: 
Politics
Politics
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 6
10
10
0
Thank you my friend MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D. for making us aware that 'Judicial Watch sent official notice letters to election officials in 14 counties and five states—Arkansas, California, Illinois, New York, and Oregon—notifying them of evident violations of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA).
Image: Counties in National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA).
The NVRA requires states to “conduct a general program that makes a reasonable effort to remove” from the official voter rolls “the names of ineligible voters” who have died or changed residence. Among other things, the NVRA requires registrations to be cancelled when voters fail to respond to address confirmation notices and then fail to vote in the next two general federal elections. In 2018, the Supreme Court confirmed that such removals are mandatory (Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Inst., 138 S. Ct. 1833, 1841-42 (2018)).
States are required by federal law to report data concerning their removal programs to the federal Election Assistance Commission (EAC). Every few years the EAC publishes this data as part of a report it provides to Congress. The most recent report and accompanying datasets were released in August of this year.
The data show that many U.S. counties reported mere handfuls of removals—and often no removals—of registrants who failed to respond to an address confirmation and failed to vote for two consecutive elections. To identify counties that are chronically behind in removing outdated registrations, we looked at the last four years of reported data, from November 2016 through November 2020. We found that some of the largest counties in the country reported absurdly low removal numbers under the NVRA’s statutory removal procedure for change of address during that period.
FYI PO1 Robert Payne PO2 (Join to see) PO3 Phyllis Maynard MSgt Robert "Rock" Aldi SMSgt Mark Venzeio SMSgt Lawrence McCarter Maj Bill Smith, Ph.D. CPO Nate S. LTC John Shaw LTC John Mohor SFC William Farrell CSM Chuck Stafford SGM Bill Frazer CSM Charles Hayden SGT (Join to see) SGT John Podlaski MSG Greg Kelly
Image: Counties in National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA).
The NVRA requires states to “conduct a general program that makes a reasonable effort to remove” from the official voter rolls “the names of ineligible voters” who have died or changed residence. Among other things, the NVRA requires registrations to be cancelled when voters fail to respond to address confirmation notices and then fail to vote in the next two general federal elections. In 2018, the Supreme Court confirmed that such removals are mandatory (Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Inst., 138 S. Ct. 1833, 1841-42 (2018)).
States are required by federal law to report data concerning their removal programs to the federal Election Assistance Commission (EAC). Every few years the EAC publishes this data as part of a report it provides to Congress. The most recent report and accompanying datasets were released in August of this year.
The data show that many U.S. counties reported mere handfuls of removals—and often no removals—of registrants who failed to respond to an address confirmation and failed to vote for two consecutive elections. To identify counties that are chronically behind in removing outdated registrations, we looked at the last four years of reported data, from November 2016 through November 2020. We found that some of the largest counties in the country reported absurdly low removal numbers under the NVRA’s statutory removal procedure for change of address during that period.
FYI PO1 Robert Payne PO2 (Join to see) PO3 Phyllis Maynard MSgt Robert "Rock" Aldi SMSgt Mark Venzeio SMSgt Lawrence McCarter Maj Bill Smith, Ph.D. CPO Nate S. LTC John Shaw LTC John Mohor SFC William Farrell CSM Chuck Stafford SGM Bill Frazer CSM Charles Hayden SGT (Join to see) SGT John Podlaski MSG Greg Kelly
(10)
(0)
MAJ Hugh Blanchard
Amazing how few changes have been made, eh? 33 registrations removed out of an illegal registration population of almost 12 million. Now, that's real progress.
(1)
(0)
6
6
0
4
4
0
"Biden Administration Illegally Censored Afghanistan Reports?"
OOPS!
And there are idiots on here that still do not understand intelligence operations.
It is too late to shut and lock the barn door after the livestock have escaped with assistance.
"Secret Service Travel Cost $2,252,600.50 For President Biden"
I wonder how many will read the entire article or just the headline?
OOPS!
And there are idiots on here that still do not understand intelligence operations.
It is too late to shut and lock the barn door after the livestock have escaped with assistance.
"Secret Service Travel Cost $2,252,600.50 For President Biden"
I wonder how many will read the entire article or just the headline?
(4)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google