Posted on Aug 10, 2018
DISCUSSION: Low-Ready vs. High-Ready – Special Tactics
10.4K
51
7
14
14
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 6
Thank you my friend SPC Elijah J. Henry, MBA for sharing. Situational awareness of the relative location of fire-team and other team members is critical especially in periods of limited visibility.
In many operations a distinctive "shape" is posted on the back of a helmet or elsewhere to identify friendly when using night-optics or through the naked eye. Changing the shape periodically is wise because enemies can learn to mimic the "shape."
I well remember low-ready with the basic M-16 rifle and M-14 rifle using unaided sights to engage.
High-ready.
Thanks for mentioning me SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
I concur with CPT Jack Durish that this does not readily apply to infantry tactics and may well be focused on civil affairs or MP security.
FYI COL Mikel J. Burroughs LTC Orlando Illi Maj Bill Smith, Ph.D. Maj William W. "Bill" Price Capt Tom Brown CMSgt (Join to see) MSG Andrew White SFC William Farrell SGT (Join to see) Sgt Albert Castro SSG David Andrews Sgt Randy Wilber SGT Charles H. Hawes SGT Mark Halmrast PO1 William "Chip" Nagel CPT Gabe SnellLTC Greg Henning
In many operations a distinctive "shape" is posted on the back of a helmet or elsewhere to identify friendly when using night-optics or through the naked eye. Changing the shape periodically is wise because enemies can learn to mimic the "shape."
I well remember low-ready with the basic M-16 rifle and M-14 rifle using unaided sights to engage.
High-ready.
Thanks for mentioning me SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
I concur with CPT Jack Durish that this does not readily apply to infantry tactics and may well be focused on civil affairs or MP security.
FYI COL Mikel J. Burroughs LTC Orlando Illi Maj Bill Smith, Ph.D. Maj William W. "Bill" Price Capt Tom Brown CMSgt (Join to see) MSG Andrew White SFC William Farrell SGT (Join to see) Sgt Albert Castro SSG David Andrews Sgt Randy Wilber SGT Charles H. Hawes SGT Mark Halmrast PO1 William "Chip" Nagel CPT Gabe SnellLTC Greg Henning
(7)
(0)
Is this evaluation based on the needs of police or infantry? I would guess "police". I see no tactical advantage in holding a weapon in either position for the infantry except in clearing operations. On the open battlefield you should not be waiting until an enemy is that close before engaging.
(7)
(0)
SPC Elijah J. Henry, MBA
I believe they try to consider both police and infantry, but with a focus on CQB.
(2)
(0)
SPC Elijah J. Henry, MBA good read/share on HIGH-READY/LOW-READY: situation dictates in the ELEMENT OF SURPRISE my friend.
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel Samantha S. Maj Marty Hogan SGT (Join to see) SGT Philip Roncari SPC Margaret Higgins SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth SP5 Michael Rathbun CW5 Jack CardwellCOL Mikel J. Burroughs CPL Dave Hoover SFC Shirley Whitfield LTC Stephen F. SSG William Jones Capt Dwayne Conyers 1SG Carl McAndrews Lt Col Charlie Brown PO1 Tony Holland SGT Jim Arnold
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel Samantha S. Maj Marty Hogan SGT (Join to see) SGT Philip Roncari SPC Margaret Higgins SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth SP5 Michael Rathbun CW5 Jack CardwellCOL Mikel J. Burroughs CPL Dave Hoover SFC Shirley Whitfield LTC Stephen F. SSG William Jones Capt Dwayne Conyers 1SG Carl McAndrews Lt Col Charlie Brown PO1 Tony Holland SGT Jim Arnold
(7)
(0)
Read This Next