Feds investigating threats to 'burn down' Supreme Court, murder justices

Thank you my friend MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D. for posting the perspective from wnd.com author Bob Unruh that "that radical abortion promoters plan to burn down or storm the Supreme Court building and murder justices and their law clerks"

It is about time IMHO and almost too late for the Feds to begin this investigation

Pro-Abortion Radicals are 'Domestic Terrorists' Who Will be Prosecuted
Violent attacks against pro-life organizations, the disruption of Masses, lewd displays in front of churches, and protests taking place at the homes of Supreme Court justices are likely just a preview of coordinated attacks anticipating the overturn of Roe v. Wade. But the groups claiming responsibility have been warned by the Thomas More Society that any acts of violence or trespassing will subject to legal action. Jim Hale spoke to attorney Paul Jonna about what has already happened and how pro-lifers should be responding.
https://rumble.com/v14hjr7-thomas-more-responds.html

Background from WND.com {[.wnd.com/2022/05/feds-investigating-social-media-threats-burn-storm-supreme-court/?ats_es=[-MD5-]]}
An alarming report from the Department of Homeland Security documents that law enforcement officials are investigating social media threats that radical abortion promoters plan to burn down or storm the Supreme Court building and murder justices and their law clerks when the court's ruling, expected to overturn Roe v. Wade, is released.
Axios obtained the report and confirmed, "Law enforcement agencies are investigating social-media threats to burn down or storm the Supreme Court building and murder justices and their clerks, as well as attacks targeting places of worship and abortion clinics."
The report said the unclassified memo, dated May 13, was by DHS' intelligence arm and reveals those threats erupted following the leak of a draft opinion, and they "are likely to persist and may increase leading up to and following the issuing of the court’s official ruling."
LifeNews called the report "very concerning" and pointed out, "The last two weeks have seen a shocking amount of pro-abortion violence following a leaked U.S. Supreme Court draft ruling that overturns Roe v. Wade. Radical abortion advocates across the country are engaging in violence, firebombing pro-life groups, vandalizing and disrupting churches, forcing pregnancy centers to close and staging intimidating protests outside the homes of members of the Supreme Court."
While Chief Justice John Roberts confirmed the authenticity of the draft opinion in an abortion dispute, which would cancel Roe entirely and return regulation of abortion to state governments, several justices have said the efforts by the pro-abortion campaigners to intimidate them will not work.
But, LifeNews said, the report "indicates their lives could be at stake once the draft becomes the official opinion of the high court."
DHS, to Axios, said the department "is committed to protecting Americans' freedom of speech and other civil rights and civil liberties, including the right to peacefully protest."

LifeNews reported, "The National Capital Region Threat Intelligence Consortium — the Washington, D.C., regional intelligence hub charged with tracking domestic terrorism threats — has referred at least 25 violent online posts to partner agencies for further investigation."

Completing this poll entitles you to WND news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
It was on social media, the report said, that threats discussed "burning down or storming the U.S. Supreme Court and murdering Justices and their clerks, members of Congress, and lawful demonstrators."
According to the DHS' Office of Intelligence and Analysis, the "grievances related to restricting abortion access could fuel violence by pro-choice abortion-related violent extremists and other [domestic violent extremists.]"
Already, an investigation has begun into a fire at a pro-life organization, Wisconsin Family Action, that happened on May 8. There, graffiti threatened, "If abortions aren't safe [then] you aren't either."

DHS said symbols there were "typically used by anarchist violent extremists and others to convey anti-law enforcement sentiment."
Also, several churches already have been vandalized, including some in Boulder and Fort Collins, Colorado, a state where leftist lawmakers and a homosexual governor recently installed into state law a plan that specifically deprives the unborn of any rights whatsoever and allows abortion up to and after birth.
The report said police also are investigating arson at a pro-life organization in Oregon.
There also have been pro-abortion radicals protesting at the homes of Supreme Court justices, which technically are illegal under federal law and should have subjected the protesters to arrest. However, that has not happened, and Democrat leaders such as Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has endorsed the illegal actions.
In a message to Attorney General Merrick Garland, who has failed to enforce that federal statute, Republican Govs. Larry Hogan, of Maryland, and Glenn Youngkin, of Virginia, urged him to "provide sustained resources to protect the justices and ensure these residential areas are secure."
On social media, a group calling itself Rise Up 4 Abortion Rights, threatened, "The leaked draft memo that states the Supreme Court has struck down #RoeVWade is an ATROCITY but It is not yet law & doesn’t have to be, but what they plan to do & will do if WE don’t stop them. Rise up! & RAISE HELL!"
Axios' report claimed abortion violence "historically has been driven by anti-abortion extremists," but conceded the memo warns, "this time, extremist acts could come from abortion-rights proponents."
Just the News said, "The federal government's recent focus on white supremacy and domestic violence appears apparent in the memo, which also reads, 'Some racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists' embrace of pro-life narratives may be linked to the perception of wanting to save white children and fight white genocide.'"
While threats to storm to court and kill justices are new, actual threats are not. WND has reported on how Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., "issued a warning" to the justices in light of their work on abortion disputes.
Fox reported it was during a virtual event featuring New Hampshire's entire House and Senate delegation that WMUR reporter Adam Sexton asked if public debate over abortion had "muted" due to many people in the U.S. only knowing life post-Roe v. Wade.
Shaheen charged that nothing would be muted about the reaction if that decision is reversed, a move that would not outlaw abortion but would turn its regulation back over to states.
"I hope the Supreme Court is listening to the people of the United States because – to go back to Adam Sexton’s question – I think if you want to see a revolution go ahead, outlaw Roe v. Wade and see what the response is of the public, particularly young people," Shaheen said.

"Because I think that will not be acceptable to young women or young men."
Earlier, during Supreme Court consideration of a separate abortion fight, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer appeared at an abortion rights rally and screamed to the crowd: "I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price! You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions."
Here are Schumer's shouts, along with the commentary provided by CNN:
Schumer's words prompted Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts to rebuke the Democratic leader.
He said, "Justices know that criticism comes with the territory, but threatening statements of this sort from the highest levels of government are not only inappropriate, they are dangerous," Roberts warned. "All Members of the Court will continue to do their job, without fear or favor, from whatever quarter."
WND reported, too, when another Democratic senator threatened the U.S. Supreme Court if its justices don't vote the way he wants on abortion.

That was Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., who told The Hill that if the justices do not vote the way he wants on abortion:

"It will inevitably fuel and drive an effort to expand the Supreme Court if this activist majority betrays fundamental constitutional principles. It's already driving that movement. Chipping away at Roe v. Wade will precipitate a seismic movement to reform the Supreme Court. It may not be expanding the Supreme Court, it may be making changes to its jurisdiction, or requiring a certain numbers of votes to strike down certain past precedents."

Longtime liberal and constitutional expert Jonathan Turley, at the time, warned of the consequences of such threats.
"I have previously criticized Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., for his almost unrivaled advocacy of censorship and speech controls. Blumenthal previously threatened social media companies not to 'backslide' in censoring opposing views. Now, Blumenthal is taking up the cudgel of court packing with not so subtle threats to conservative justices that, if they do not vote with their liberal colleagues, the court may be fundamentally altered. He is not alone in such reckless and coercive rhetoric."

Turley noted, "Democratic leaders not only have embraced court packing but now openly threaten the court to vote with the liberal justices or face dire consequences for the court. …The Democrats are pushing to engage in court packing despite polls showing heavy opposition to the move from voters as well as opposition from the justices themselves."

He continued, "It is particularly chilling to see United States senators openly pressuring justices to vote with their side or face severe consequences. Blumenthal went as far as to mention specific cases and the expected rulings. This follows raw demands in the confirmation hearing of now Justice Amy Coney Barrett that she promise to rule on particular cases 'correctly' as a condition for her confirmation," he said.
Harris promotes abortion in virtual White House event

"Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after nearly three decades with the Associated Press, as well as several Upper Midwest newspapers, where he covered everything from legislative battles and sports to tornadoes and homicidal survivalists. He is also a photographer whose scenic work has been used commercially."

FYI Lt Col Charlie Brown LTC John Shaw LTC John Mohor LTC David Brown Maj Bill Smith, Ph.D. MCPO Hilary Kunz CPL Douglas Chrysler CMDCM John F. "Doc" Bradshaw PO3 Edward Riddle PO1 Jeff Chandler MSG Roy CheeverSPC Nancy Greene
GySgt Jack Wallace SPC Michael Duricko, Ph.D SSG Donald H "Don" Bates SPC Michael Terrell SPC Woody Bullard CPL Ronald Keyes Jr CMDCM John F. "Doc" Bradshaw

MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D. - If there is as much as a lit match, a bomb, a bullet fired at or near the Supreme Court of the United States or any of the Justices or their families or their staff are threatened in any way, those who have been a part of this action should pay the ultimate price in my view... It is time to throw down the gauntlet and say "NO MORE"!!! Just saying!!!

Paid-actors by anti-choice folks? The first thing that comes to mind. These days can't trust anything to be as it seems. That's why investigating is a good thing to do before news is actually suitable to be news. It stinks of all the stuff we learned while growing up that infiltrators trying to undermine our system of government would do. And no one even imagines that theses days.
Anti abortion extremists did that for a very long time, so anti-choice doing it should not be such a surprise - staged of not.

It would be interesting to know if those doing the threatening are predominately men or women. If not both that, alone, would tell a story . . .